The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains at least 29 active genes encoding SET domain proteins that can be assigned to four evolutionarily conserved classes
Open accessAbstract
SET domains are conserved amino acid motifs present in chromosomal proteins that function in epigenetic control of gene expression. These proteins can be divided into four classes as typified by their Drosophila members E(Z), TRX, ASH1 and SU(VAR)3-9. Homologs of all four classes have been identified in yeast and mammals, but not in plants. A BLASTP screening of the Arabidopsis genome identified 37 genes: three E(z) homologs, five trx homologs, four ash1 homologs and 15 genes similar to Su(var)3-9. Seven genes were assigned as trx-related and three as ash1-related. Only four genes have been described previously. Our classification is based on the characteristics of the SET domains, cysteine-rich regions and additional conserved domains, including a novel YGD domain. RT-PCR analysis, cDNA cloning and matching ESTs show that at least 29 of the genes are active in diverse tissues. The high number of SET domain genes, possibly involved in epigenetic control of gene activity during plant development, can partly be explained by extensive genome duplication in Arabidopsis. Additionally, the lack of introns in the coding region of eight SU(VAR)3-9 class genes indicates evolution of new genes by retrotransposition. The identification of putative nuclear localization signals and AT-hooks in many of the proteins supports an anticipated nuclear localization, which was demonstrated for selected proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases
Rea, S., Eisenhaber, F., O'Carroll, D., Strahl, B. D., Sun, Z.-W., Schmid, M., Opravil, S., Mechtler, K., Ponting, C. P., Allis, C. D., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35020506 · Cited by 2,845
Tachibana, M., Sugimoto, K., Fukushima, T., & Shinkai, Y. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m101914200 · Cited by 784
Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins
Reute, G., & Spierer, P. (1992) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950140907 · Cited by 309
Gray, T. A., Hernandez, L., Carey, A. H., Schaldach, M. A., Smithwick, M. J., Rus, K., Marshall Graves, J. A., Stewart, C. L., & Nicholls, R. D. (2000) · Genomics · doi:10.1006/geno.2000.6199 · Cited by 108
Functional analysis of mouse Polycomb group genes.
van Lohuizen, M. (1998) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s000180050126 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Position-effect variegation and the genetic dissection of chromatin regulation in Drosophila
Schotta, G., Ebert, A., Dorn, R., & Reuter, G. (2003) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s1084-9521(02)00138-6 · Cited by 213
Binding of SU(VAR)3-9 partially depends on SETDB1 in the chromosomes of drosophila melanogaster
Maksimov, D. A., & Koryakov, D. E. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8091030 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumbusch, L. O.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4319-4333
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2137493363
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.