Cited by 60Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiotin and Related StudiesCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

PINA 3.0: mining cancer interactome

Open access
Du, Yang, Cai, Meng, Xing, Xiaofang, Ji, Jiafu, Yang, Ence, Wu, Jianmin·2021·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial to mediate biological functions, and understanding PPIs in cancer type-specific context could help decipher the underlying molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis and identify potential therapeutic options. Therefore, we update the Protein Interaction Network Analysis (PINA) platform to version 3.0, to integrate the unified human interactome with RNA-seq transcriptomes and mass spectrometry-based proteomes across tens of cancer types. A number of new analytical utilities were developed to help characterize the cancer context for a PPI network, which includes inferring proteins with expression specificity and identifying candidate prognosis biomarkers, putative cancer drivers, and therapeutic targets for a specific cancer type; as well as identifying pairs of co-expressing interacting proteins across cancer types. Furthermore, a brand-new web interface has been designed to integrate these new utilities within an interactive network visualization environment, which allows users to quickly and comprehensively investigate the roles of human interacting proteins in a cancer type-specific context. PINA is freely available at https://omics.bjcancer.org/pina/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaa1075

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, Y., Cai, M., Xing, X., Ji, J., Yang, E., & Wu, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Ence
  • Wu, Jianmin
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2020-11-24
Volume
49
Issue
D1
Pages
D1351-D1357
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3108941912
Cited by
60
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • PKU-Baidu Fund (2019BD012)
  • Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z201100008320006)
  • Beijing Municipal Bureau of Health (2019-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, human interactome, prognostic factors, cancer drivers, therapeutic target, network visualization
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Software, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Internet, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Data Mining, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Transcriptome, Exome, Protein Interaction Maps, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review