Cited by 992CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

Digenome-seq: Genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-cas9 off-target effects in human cells

Kim, Daesik, Bae, Sangsu, Park, Jeongbin, Kim, Eunji, Kim, Seokjoong, Yu, Hye Ryeong, Hwang, Jinha, Kim, Jong-Il +1 more·2015·Nature Methods

Abstract

Although RNA-guided genome editing via the CRISPR-Cas9 system is now widely used in biomedical research, genome-wide target specificities of Cas9 nucleases remain controversial. Here we present Digenome-seq, in vitro Cas9-digested whole-genome sequencing, to profile genome-wide Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. This in vitro digest yields sequence reads with the same 5' ends at cleavage sites that can be computationally identified. We validated off-target sites at which insertions or deletions were induced with frequencies below 0.1%, near the detection limit of targeted deep sequencing. We also showed that Cas9 nucleases can be highly specific, inducing off-target mutations at merely several, rather than thousands of, sites in the entire genome and that Cas9 off-target effects can be avoided by replacing 'promiscuous' single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) with modified sgRNAs. Digenome-seq is a robust, sensitive, unbiased and cost-effective method for profiling genome-wide off-target effects of programmable nucleases including Cas9.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3284

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digenome-seq is a highly sensitive method that can identify indels with 0.1% frequency or lower.

    “Digenome-seq is a highly sensitive method that can identify indels with 0.1% frequency or lower (Kim et al., 2015).”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D., Bae, S., Park, J., Kim, E., Kim, S., Yu, H. R., Hwang, J., Kim, J.-I., & Kim, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • ToolGen (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jong-Il
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2015-02-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
237-243
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2085993152
Cited by
992
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 46
FWCI
51.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Basic Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target effects, single guide RNA, genome-wide characterization, indels, human cells, programmable nucleases
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cell Line, Endonucleases, Haploidy, Humans, Mutation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Limit of Detection, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review