Cited by 424Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesResearch Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data Management

The Sequence Read Archive: a decade more of explosive growth

Open access
Katz, Kenneth, Shutov, Oleg, Lapoint, Richard, Kimelman, Michael, Brister, J Rodney, O’Sullivan, Christopher·2022·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Sequence Read Archive (SRA, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) stores raw sequencing data and alignment information to enhance reproducibility and facilitate new discoveries through data analysis. Here we note changes in storage designed to increase access and highlight analyses that augment metadata with taxonomic insight to help users select data. In addition, we present three unanticipated applications of taxonomic analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkab1053

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Short Read Archive of biological sequence data holds over 14 petabytes of information, which is more than 1,000 times larger than the dataset used to train ChatGPT.

    “For instance, the Short Read Archive of biological sequence data holds over 14 petabytes of information,112 which is more than 1,000 times larger than the dataset used to train ChatGPT.113”

    From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [112]

    The Introduction describes the Sequence Read Archive as holding data at petabyte scale. The Figure 1 caption (following the Conclusion) reports approximately 25.6 petabase pairs, not over 14 petabytes of stored information. The ChatGPT comparison has a separate citation (113) and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, K., Shutov, O., Lapoint, R., Kimelman, M., Brister, J. R., & O’Sullivan, C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, Kenneth
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2021-11-24
Volume
50
Issue
D1
Pages
D387-D390
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3216588755
Cited by
424
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
Sequence Read Archive, raw sequencing data, data storage, data access, metadata, taxonomic analysis, reproducibility, data curation
MeSH terms
Metadata, SARS-CoV-2, Bacteria, Base Sequence, Phylogeny, Software, Viruses, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Internet, Databases, Genetic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review