CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCBI RefSeq: reference sequence standards through 25 years of curation and annotation

Goldfarb, Tamara, Kodali, Vamsi K, Pujar, Shashikant, Brover, Vyacheslav, Robbertse, Barbara, Farrell, Catherine M, Oh, Dong-Ha, Astashyn, Alexander, Ermolaeva, Olga, Haddad, Diana, Hlavina, Wratko, Hoffman, Jinna, Jackson, John D, Joardar, Vinita S, Kristensen, David, Masterson, Patrick, McGarvey, Kelly M, McVeigh, Richard, Mozes, Eyal, Murphy, Michael R, Schafer, Susan S, Souvorov, Alexander, Spurrier, Brett, Strope, Pooja K, Sun, Hanzhen, Vatsan, Anjana R, Wallin, Craig, Webb, David, Brister, J Rodney, Hatcher, Eneida, Kimchi, Avi, Klimke, William, Marchler-Bauer, Aron, Pruitt, Kim D, Thibaud-Nissen, Françoise, Murphy, Terence D·2025·Nucleic Acids Research
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkae1038
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Reference sequences and annotations serve as the foundation for many lines of research today, from organism and sequence identification to providing a core description of the genes, transcripts and proteins found in an organism's genome. Interpretation of data including transcriptomics, proteomics, sequence variation and comparative analyses based on reference gene annotations informs our understanding of gene function and possible disease mechanisms, leading to new biomedical discoveries. The Reference Sequence (RefSeq) resource created at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) leverages both automatic processes and expert curation to create a robust set of reference sequences of genomic, transcript and protein data spanning the tree of life. RefSeq continues to refine its annotation and quality control processes and utilize better quality genomes resulting from advances in sequencing technologies as well as RNA-Seq data to produce high-quality annotated genomes, ortholog predictions across more organisms and other products that are easily accessible through multiple NCBI resources. This report summarizes the current status of the eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral RefSeq resources, with a focus on eukaryotic annotation, the increase in taxonomic representation and the effect it will have on comparative genomics. The RefSeq resource is publicly accessible at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkae1038

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Pruitt, 2000, Introducing RefSeq and LocusLink: curated human genome resources at the NCBI, Trends Genet., 16, 44, 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01882-X · DOI
  2. Arita, 2021, The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D121, 10.1093/nar/gkaa967 · DOI
  3. Sayers, 2024, GenBank 2024 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D134, 10.1093/nar/gkad903 · DOI
  4. Brown, 2015, Gene: a gene-centered information resource at NCBI, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D36, 10.1093/nar/gku1055 · DOI
  5. Sherry, 2001, dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 308, 10.1093/nar/29.1.308 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Landrum, 2020, ClinVar: improvements to accessing data, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, D835, 10.1093/nar/gkz972 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rangwala, 2021, Accessing NCBI data using the NCBI sequence viewer and genome data viewer (GDV), Genome Res., 31, 159, 10.1101/gr.266932.120 · DOI
  8. Rangwala, 2024, Interactive visualization of whole eukaryote genome alignments using NCBI’s Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV), PLoS Biol., 22, e3002405, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002405 · DOI
  9. Bornstein, 2023, The NIH Comparative Genomics Resource: addressing the promises and challenges of comparative genomics on human health, BMC Genomics [Electronic Resource], 24, 575
  10. Haft, 2024, RefSeq and the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline in the age of metagenomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D762, 10.1093/nar/gkad988 · DOI
  11. Li, 2021, RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D1020, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 · DOI
  12. Ciufo, 2018, Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 68, 2386, 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809 · DOI
  13. Astashyn, 2024, Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX, Genome Biol., 25, 60, 10.1186/s13059-024-03198-7 · DOI
  14. Siddell, 2023, Virus taxonomy and the role of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), J. Gen. Virol., 104, 001840, 10.1099/jgv.0.001840 · DOI
  15. Karp, 2023, The EcoCyc Database (2023), EcoSal Plus, 11, eesp00022023, 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0002-2023 · DOI
  16. Parks, 2015, CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes, Genome Res., 25, 1043, 10.1101/gr.186072.114 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Katz, 2022, The Sequence Read Archive: a decade more of explosive growth, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, D387, 10.1093/nar/gkab1053 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kapustin, 2008, Splign: algorithms for computing spliced alignments with identification of paralogs, Biol. Direct, 3, 20, 10.1186/1745-6150-3-20 · DOI
  19. Li, 2018, Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 34, 3094, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Takahashi, 2012, 5′ end-centered expression profiling using cap-analysis gene expression and next-generation sequencing, Nat. Protoc., 7, 542, 10.1038/nprot.2012.005 · DOI
  21. Lizio, 2015, Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas, Genome Biol., 16, 22, 10.1186/s13059-014-0560-6 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Giuffra, 2019, Functional annotation of animal genomes (FAANG): current achievements and roadmap, Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 7, 65, 10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-114913 · DOI
  23. Rajput, 2019, RefSeq curation and annotation of stop codon recoding in vertebrates, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, 594, 10.1093/nar/gky1234 · DOI
  24. Kozomara, 2019, miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D155, 10.1093/nar/gky1141 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Chan, 2021, tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, 9077, 10.1093/nar/gkab688 · DOI
  26. Nawrocki, 2013, Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches, Bioinformatics, 29, 2933, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 · DOI
  27. Kalvari, 2021, Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D192, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1047 · DOI
  28. Seal, 2023, Genenames.Org: the HGNC resources in 2023, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, D1003, 10.1093/nar/gkac888 · DOI
  29. Ringwald, 2022, Mouse Genome informatics (MGI): latest news from MGD and GXD, Mamm. Genome, 33, 4, 10.1007/s00335-021-09921-0 · DOI
  30. Laulederkind, 2023, The rat genome Database: genetic, genomic, and phenotypic data across multiple species, Curr. Protoc., 3, e804, 10.1002/cpz1.804 · DOI
  31. UniProt, 2021, UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D480, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Thurmond, 2019, FlyBase 2.0: the next generation, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D759, 10.1093/nar/gky1003 · DOI
  33. Reiser, 2022, Using the Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR) to find information about arabidopsis genes, Curr. Protoc., 2, e574, 10.1002/cpz1.574 · DOI
  34. Sternberg, 2024, WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure, Genetics, 227, iyae050, 10.1093/genetics/iyae050 · DOI
  35. Wong, 2023, Saccharomyces genome database update: server architecture, pan-genome nomenclature, and external resources, Genetics, 224, iyac191, 10.1093/genetics/iyac191 · DOI
  36. Rutherford, 2024, PomBase: a global core biodata resource-growth, collaboration, and sustainability, Genetics, 227, iyae007, 10.1093/genetics/iyae007 · DOI
  37. World Health Organization, 2022, WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action
  38. Ge, 2024, Comprehensive analysis of microbial content in whole-genome sequencing samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas project, 10.1101/2024.05.24.595788 · DOI
  39. Saary, 2020, Estimating the quality of eukaryotic genomes recovered from metagenomic analysis with EukCC, Genome Biol., 21, 244, 10.1186/s13059-020-02155-4 · DOI
  40. Alvarez-Jarreta, 2024, VEuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen, vector and host bioinformatics resource center in 2023, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D808, 10.1093/nar/gkad1003 · DOI
  41. Schoch, 2012, Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 6241, 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI
  42. Sharma, 2018, The NCBI BioCollections Database, Database (Oxford), 2018, bay006, 10.1093/database/bay006 · DOI
  43. Schoch, 2020, NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools, Database (Oxford), 2020, baaa062, 10.1093/database/baaa062 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kennedy, 2022, Publicly available and validated DNA reference sequences are critical to fungal identification and global plant protection efforts: a use-case in colletotrichum, Plant Dis., 106, 1573, 10.1094/PDIS-09-21-2083-SR · DOI
  45. Schoch, 2014, Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi, Database (Oxford), 2014, bau061, 10.1093/database/bau061 · DOI
  46. Schaffer, 2021, Ribovore: ribosomal RNA sequence analysis for GenBank submissions and database curation, BMC Bioinform., 22, 400, 10.1186/s12859-021-04316-z · DOI
  47. de Hoog, 2020, Atlas of Clinical Fungi: The Ultimate Benchtool for Diagnostics
  48. Bhunjun, 2024, What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?, Stud. Mycol., 108, 1
  49. Vandamme, 2021, Out with the old and in with the new: time to rethink twentieth century chemotaxonomic practices in bacterial taxonomy, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 71, 5127, 10.1099/ijsem.0.005127 · DOI
  50. Tringe, 2008, A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 11, 442, 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.011 · DOI
  51. Feldgarden, 2021, AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence, Sci. Rep., 11, 12728, 10.1038/s41598-021-91456-0 · DOI
  52. Partridge, 2018, Proposal for assignment of allele numbers for mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 73, 2625, 10.1093/jac/dky262 · DOI
  53. Bradford, 2022, Consensus on beta-lactamase nomenclature, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 66, e0033322, 10.1128/aac.00333-22 · DOI
  54. Feldgarden, 2022, Curation of the AMRFinderPlus databases: applications, functionality and impact, Microb. Genom., 8, mgen000832
  55. O’Leary, 2024, Exploring and retrieving sequence and metadata for species across the tree of life with NCBI datasets, Sci. Data, 11, 732, 10.1038/s41597-024-03571-y · DOI
  56. Jones, 2014, InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification, Bioinformatics, 30, 1236, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 · DOI
  57. Thomas, 2022, PANTHER: making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all, Protein Sci., 31, 8, 10.1002/pro.4218 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Kalbfleisch, 2023, The assembled genome of the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat, Hypertension, 80, 138, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20140 · DOI
  59. Farrell, 2022, RefSeq Functional Elements as experimentally assayed nongenic reference standards and functional interactions in human and mouse, Genome Res., 32, 175, 10.1101/gr.275819.121 · DOI
  60. Jones, 2023, The VGNC: expanding standardized vertebrate gene nomenclature, Genome Biol., 24, 115, 10.1186/s13059-023-02957-2 · DOI
  61. Fisher, 2023, Xenbase: key features and resources of the Xenopus model organism knowledgebase, Genetics, 224, iyad018, 10.1093/genetics/iyad018 · DOI
  62. Burt, 2009, The Chicken Gene Nomenclature Committee report, BMC Genomics [Electronic Resource], 10, S5
  63. Bradford, 2022, Zebrafish information network, the knowledgebase for Danio rerio research, Genetics, 220, iyac016, 10.1093/genetics/iyac016 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Pujar, 2018, Consensus coding sequence (CCDS) database: a standardized set of human and mouse protein-coding regions supported by expert curation, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D221, 10.1093/nar/gkx1031 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Miller, 2023, ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), Genet. Med., 25, 100866, 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100866 · DOI
  66. Matthews, 2018, Improved reference genome of Aedes aegypti informs arbovirus vector control, Nature, 563, 501, 10.1038/s41586-018-0692-z · DOI
  67. Makova, 2023, The complete sequence and comparative analysis of ape sex chromosomes, Nature, 630, 401, 10.1038/s41586-024-07473-2 · DOI
  68. Burke, 2014, Widespread genome reorganization of an obligate virus mutualist, PLoS Genet., 10, e1004660, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004660 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goldfarb, T., Kodali, V. K., Pujar, S., Brover, V., Robbertse, B., Farrell, C. M., Oh, D.-H., Astashyn, A., Ermolaeva, O., Haddad, D., Hlavina, W., Hoffman, J., Jackson, J. D., Joardar, V. S., Kristensen, D., Masterson, P., McGarvey, K. M., McVeigh, R., Mozes, E., Murphy, M. R., Schafer, S. S., Souvorov, A., Spurrier, B., Strope, P. K., Sun, H., Vatsan, A. R., Wallin, C., Webb, D., Brister, J. R., Hatcher, E., Kimchi, A., Klimke, W., Marchler-Bauer, A., Pruitt, K. D., Thibaud-Nissen, F., & Murphy, T. D.
Affiliations
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health , 45 Center Drive,  Bethesda , MD 20894 ,
ORCID
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2024-11-11
Volume
53
Issue
D1
Pages
D243-D257
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
DOI
10.1093/nar/gkae1038
Cited by
455
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • National Center for Biotechnology Information
  • National Library of Medicine
  • National Institutes of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review