Cited by 3RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryChromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Molecular Biology Research

RG motifs promote piRNA-mediated gene silencing in C. elegans

Open access
Wallis, Dylan C, Phillips, Carolyn M·2025·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Argonaute proteins are essential components of RNA silencing pathways, and their N-terminal extensions, particularly in the PIWI clade, often harbor conserved RG motifs. Despite their prevalence, the function of these motifs remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the RG motifs in the N-terminal region of Caenorhabditis elegans PRG-1, a PIWI clade Argonaute. Sequence alignment across Caenorhabditis species reveals three conserved RG motifs, which we confirm to be methylated by mass spectrometry. The region surrounding these motifs is intrinsically disordered, as predicted by disorder algorithms and structural modeling. While the RG motifs are critical for fertility, germline morphology, and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) silencing, they are not required for PRG-1 expression, localization, or piRNA loading. Notably, mutation of the RG motifs results in defects in downstream small RNA production, specifically the depletion of WAGO-class small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), without affecting piRNA biogenesis. These findings suggest that the RG motifs of PRG-1 play a crucial role in linking piRNA-mediated silencing to siRNA production, and that their function is critical for fertility and germline maintenance in C. elegans. Despite these defects, the phenotypic severity in the RG mutant is milder than in a PRG-1 null mutant, highlighting the complexity of PRG-1 function and its post-translational modifications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaf1331

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallis, D. C., & Phillips, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Carolyn M
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2025-11-26
Volume
53
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4417524077
Cited by
3
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R35 GM119656)
  • Chemistry-Biology Interface
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
PRG-1, siRNA, intrinsically disordered regions, protein methylation, fertility, Caenorhabditis elegans, RNA silencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review