The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server
Open accessAbstract
The Robetta server (http://robetta.bakerlab.org) provides automated tools for protein structure prediction and analysis. For structure prediction, sequences submitted to the server are parsed into putative domains and structural models are generated using either comparative modeling or de novo structure prediction methods. If a confident match to a protein of known structure is found using BLAST, PSI-BLAST, FFAS03 or 3D-Jury, it is used as a template for comparative modeling. If no match is found, structure predictions are made using the de novo Rosetta fragment insertion method. Experimental nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) constraints data can also be submitted with a query sequence for RosettaNMR de novo structure determination. Other current capabilities include the prediction of the effects of mutations on protein-protein interactions using computational interface alanine scanning. The Rosetta protein design and protein-protein docking methodologies will soon be available through the server as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences.
Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., & Stock, J. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · Cited by 3,953
Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries
Wheelan, S. J., Marchler-Bauer, A., & Bryant, S. H. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.613 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“A significant fraction of domains in the PDB (Protein Data Bank) are within this length (18).”
Background
Cited by
Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model
Wang, S., Sun, S., Li, Z., Zhang, R., & Xu, J. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · Cited by 931
Zhang, C., Freddolino, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx366 · Cited by 606
Structure of activated transcription complex Pol II–DSIF–PAF–SPT6
Vos, S. M., Farnung, L., Boehning, M., Wigge, C., Linden, A., Urlaub, H., & Cramer, P. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0440-4 · Cited by 432
Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning
Xu, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821309116 · Cited by 401
Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683 · Cited by 369
Potapov, V., Cohen, M., & Schreiber, G. (2009) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzp030 · Cited by 349
Haas, J., Barbato, A., Behringer, D., Studer, G., Roth, S., Bertoni, M., Mostaguir, K., Gumienny, R., & Schwede, T. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25431 · Cited by 168
Homotypic fibrillization of TMEM106B across diverse neurodegenerative diseases
Chang, A., Xiang, X., Wang, J., Lee, C., Arakhamia, T., Simjanoska, M., Wang, C., Carlomagno, Y., Zhang, G., Dhingra, S., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.026 · Cited by 150
The second messenger c-di-AMP inhibits the osmolyte uptake system OpuC in Staphylococcus aureus
Schuster, C. F., Bellows, L. E., Tosi, T., Campeotto, I., Corrigan, R. M., Freemont, P., & Gründling, A. (2016) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaf7279 · Cited by 109
Alpha-Synuclein defects autophagy by impairing SNAP29-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion
Tang, Q., Gao, P., Arzberger, T., Höllerhage, M., Herms, J., Höglinger, G., & Koeglsperger, T. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04138-0 · Cited by 103
SpotOn: High Accuracy Identification of Protein-Protein Interface Hot-Spots
Moreira, I. S., Koukos, P. I., Melo, R., Almeida, J. G., Preto, A. J., Schaarschmidt, J., Trellet, M., Gümüş, Z. H., Costa, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08321-2 · Cited by 98
Context-Based Identification of Protein-Protein Interfaces and “Hot-Spot” Residues
Geppert, T., Hoy, B., Wessler, S., & Schneider, G. (2011) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.01.005 · Cited by 80
Khabou, H., Desrosiers, M., Winckler, C., Fouquet, S., Auregan, G., Bemelmans, A., Sahel, J., & Dalkara, D. (2016) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26031 · Cited by 71
Peng, Y., Shinde, D. N., Valencia, C. A., Mo, J.-S., Rosenfeld, J., Truitt Cho, M., Chamberlin, A., Li, Z., Liu, J., Gui, B., et al. (2017) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddx377 · Cited by 60
Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: A case study in GPCRs
Bender, B. J., Marlow, B., & Meiler, J. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007597 · Cited by 44
Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design
Moffat, L., Greener, J. G., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.24.457549 · Cited by 33
Distinct Binding Mechanisms for Allosteric Sodium Ion in Cannabinoid Receptors
Dutta, S., Selvam, B., & Shukla, D. (2022) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00760 · Cited by 31
Bucki, R., Wang, Y.-H., Yang, C., Kandy, S. K., Fatunmbi, O., Bradley, R., Pogoda, K., Svitkina, T., Radhakrishnan, R., & Janmey, P. A. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.005552 · Cited by 31
Spencer, B. L., Job, A. M., Robertson, C. M., Hameed, Z. A., Serchejian, C., Wiafe‐Kwakye, C. S., Mendonça, J. C., Apolonio, M. A., Nagao, P. E., Neely, M. N., et al. (2023) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.15115 · Cited by 28
Meitzler, J. L., Gray, J. J., & Hendrickson, T. L. (2007) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.03.035 · Cited by 18
Chao, T.-H., Rekhi, S., Mittal, J., & Tabor, D. P. (2023) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/d3me00053b · Cited by 14
Yi, L., Bozkurt, G., Li, Q., Lo, S., Menon, A. K., & Wu, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep45912 · Cited by 12
Nawarathnage, S., Tseng, Y. J., Soleimani, S., Smith, T., Pedroza Romo, M. J., Abiodun, W. O., Egbert, C. M., Madhusanka, D., Bunn, D., Woods, B., et al. (2023) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2023.09.001 · Cited by 6
Gds1 Interacts with NuA4 To Promote H4 Acetylation at Ribosomal Protein Genes
Joo, Y. J., & Buratowski, S. (2022) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00373-21 · Cited by 5
Structural characterization of DNA-binding domain of essential mammalian protein TTF 1
Singh, G., Bhopale, A. J., Khatri, S., Prakash, P., Kumar, R., Singh, S. M., & Singh, S. K. (2024) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20240800 · Cited by 1
Porokhin, V., Brown, A. M., & Hassoun, S. (2025) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-025-00613-4 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, D. E., Chivian, D., & Baker, D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- Web Server
- Pages
- W526-W531
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2115167726
- Cited by
- 2,111
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.