Cited by 547Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

eggNOG: automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes

Open access
Jensen, L. J., Julien, P., Kuhn, M., von Mering, C., Muller, J., Doerks, T., Bork, P.·2007·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The identification of orthologous genes forms the basis for most comparative genomics studies. Existing approaches either lack functional annotation of the identified orthologous groups, hampering the interpretation of subsequent results, or are manually annotated and thus lag behind the rapid sequencing of new genomes. Here we present the eggNOG database ('evolutionary genealogy of genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups'), which contains orthologous groups constructed from Smith-Waterman alignments through identification of reciprocal best matches and triangular linkage clustering. Applying this procedure to 312 bacterial, 26 archaeal and 35 eukaryotic genomes yielded 43 582 course-grained orthologous groups of which 9724 are extended versions of those from the original COG/KOG database. We also constructed more fine-grained groups for selected subsets of organisms, such as the 19 914 mammalian orthologous groups. We automatically annotated our non-supervised orthologous groups with functional descriptions, which were derived by identifying common denominators for the genes based on their individual textual descriptions, annotated functional categories, and predicted protein domains. The orthologous groups in eggNOG contain 1 241 751 genes and provide at least a broad functional description for 77% of them. Users can query the resource for individual genes via a web interface or download the complete set of orthologous groups at http://eggnog.embl.de.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkm796

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graph-based methods cluster genes into pairs or groups of orthologs based on pairwise sequence similarity such as reciprocal best alignment hits.

    “Graph-based methods cluster genes into pairs or groups of orthologs based on pairwise sequence similarity such as (reciprocal) best alignment hits (8–12).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Fitch WM Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins J. Biol. Chem 1970 19 99 113 5449325
  2. [2]Tatusov RL Koonin EV Lipman DJ A genomic perspective on protein families Science 1997 278 631 637 9381173
  3. [3]Sonnhammer EL Koonin EV Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes Trends Genet 2002 18 619 620 12446146
  4. [4]Koonin EV Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics Annu. Rev. Genet 39 309 338 16285863
  5. [5]O'Brien KP Remm M Sonnhammer ELL Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 D476 D480 15608241 PMC540061
  6. [6]Alexeyenko A Tamas I Liu G Sonnhammer ELL Automatic clustering of orthologs and inparalogs shared by multiple proteomes Bioinformatics 2006 14 e9 e15 16873526
  7. [7]Lee Y Sultana R Pertea G Cho J Karamycheva S Tsai J Parvizi B Cheung F Cross-referencing eukaryotic genomes: TIGR orthologous gene assignments (TOGA) Genome Res 2002 12 493 502 11875039 PMC155294
  8. [8]Tatusov RL Fedorova ND Jackson JD Jacobs AR Kiryutin B Koonin EV Krylov DM Mazumder R Mekhedov S The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes BMC Bioinformatics 2003 4 41 12969510 PMC222959
  9. [9]Li L Stoeckert CJ Roos DS OrthoMCL: identification of orthologous groups for eukaryotic genomes Genome Res 2003 13 2178 2189 12952885 PMC403725
  10. [10]Li H Coghlan A Ruan J Coin LJ Hériché J-K Osmotherly L Li R Liu T TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 D572 D580 16381935 PMC1347480
  11. [11]van der Heijden RTJM Snel B van Noort V Huynen MA Orthology prediction at scalable resolution by phylogenetic tree analysis BMC Bioinformatics 2007 8 83 17346331 PMC1838432
  12. [12]Hubbard TJP Aken BL Beal K Ballester B Caccamo M Chen Y Clarke L Coates G Ensembl 2007 Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 D610 D617 17148474 PMC1761443
  13. [13]Wapinski I Pfeffer A Friedman N Regev A Automatic genome-wide reconstruction of phylogenetic trees Bioinformatics 2007 23 i549 i558 17646342
  14. [15]Kanehisa M Goto S Hattori M Aoki-Kinoshita KF Itoh M Kawashima S Katayama T Araki M Hirakawa M From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 D354 D357 16381885 PMC1347464
  15. [16]Letunic I Copley RR Schmidt S Ciccarelli F Doerks T Schultz J Ponting CP Bork P SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 D142 D144 14681379 PMC308822
  16. [17]Finn RD Mistry J Schuster-Böckler B Griffiths-Jones S Hollich V Lassmann T Moxon S Marshall M Pfam: clans, web tools and services Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 D247 D251 16381856 PMC1347511
  17. [19]von Mering C Jensen LJ Kuhn M Chaffron S Doerks T Krüger B Snel B Bork P STRING 7—recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 D358 D362 17098935 PMC1669762
  18. [20]Letunic I Bork P Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation Bioinformatics 2007 23 127 128 17050570

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, L. J., Julien, P., Kuhn, M., von Mering, C., Muller, J., Doerks, T., & Bork, P.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2007-12-23
Volume
36
Issue
Database
Pages
D250-D254
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2154364831
Cited by
547
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
eggNOG, orthogroups, comparative genomics, functional annotation, Smith-Waterman alignment, protein domains, gene annotation databases
MeSH terms
Animals, Genes, Phylogeny, Proteins, Quality Control, User-Computer Interface, Internet, Genomics, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review