Cited by 1,705Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning

Open access
Chklovski, Alex, Parks, Donovan H., Woodcroft, Ben J., Tyson, Gene W.·2023·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools have dramatically increased the recovery rate of microbial genomes from metagenomic data. Assessing the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) is a critical step before downstream analysis. Here, we present CheckM2, an improved method of predicting genome quality of MAGs using machine learning. Using synthetic and experimental data, we demonstrate that CheckM2 outperforms existing tools in both accuracy and computational speed. In addition, CheckM2's database can be rapidly updated with new high-quality reference genomes, including taxa represented only by a single genome. We also show that CheckM2 accurately predicts genome quality for MAGs from novel lineages, even for those with reduced genome size (for example, Patescibacteria and the DPANN superphylum). CheckM2 provides accurate genome quality predictions across bacterial and archaeal lineages, giving increased confidence when inferring biological conclusions from MAGs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The final B. bifidum dataset encompassed 1,351 unique high-quality sequences, including 156 genomes from cultured isolates and 1,195 MAGs.

    “After genome quality control and dereplication using CheckM2 and drep [38,39] , the final B. bifidum dataset encompassed 1,351 unique high-quality sequences, including 156 genomes from cultured isolates and 1,195 MAGs [Supplementary Table 1].”
  • The quality of each genome was evaluated using CheckM2, based on completeness and contamination levels; genomes with completeness below 95% and/or contamination above 5% were discarded.

    “The quality of each genome was evaluated using CheckM2, based on completeness and contamination levels [38] . Genomes with completeness below 95% and/or contamination above 5% were discarded.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abadi, M. et al. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. in 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16) 265-283 (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chklovski, A., Parks, D. H., Woodcroft, B. J., & Tyson, G. W.
Affiliations
Translational Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Tyson, Gene W.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2023-07-27
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1203-1212
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W4385302529
Cited by
1,705
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 810 · 2025: 526 · 2024: 297 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
152.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2022070)
  • McMaster University
  • Australian Government
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Australian Research Council (FT170100070, DE160100248)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
metagenome-assembled genomes, genome quality assessment, microbial genomes, machine learning, reference genome database, Patescibacteria, novel lineages, archaea, bacterial genomes
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Bacteria, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Genome, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review