Cited by 43Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The allele distribution in next-generation sequencing data sets is accurately described as the result of a stochastic branching process

Open access
Heinrich, Verena, Stange, Jens, Dickhaus, Thorsten, Imkeller, Peter, Krüger, Ulrike, Bauer, Sebastian, Mundlos, Stefan, Robinson, Peter N. +2 more·2012·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

With the availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, it is expected that sequence variants may be called on a genomic scale. Here, we demonstrate that a deeper understanding of the distribution of the variant call frequencies at heterozygous loci in NGS data sets is a prerequisite for sensitive variant detection. We model the crucial steps in an NGS protocol as a stochastic branching process and derive a mathematical framework for the expected distribution of alleles at heterozygous loci before measurement that is sequencing. We confirm our theoretical results by analyzing technical replicates of human exome data and demonstrate that the variance of allele frequencies at heterozygous loci is higher than expected by a simple binomial distribution. Due to this high variance, mutation callers relying on binomial distributed priors are less sensitive for heterozygous variants that deviate strongly from the expected mean frequency. Our results also indicate that error rates can be reduced to a greater degree by technical replicates than by increasing sequencing depth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkr1073

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple independent library preparations in individual cells likely lead to improved sampling of the transcriptome compared to fewer independent libraries sequenced more deeply.

    “Most likely, multiple independent library preparations in individual cells lead to an improved sampling of the transcriptome as compared to fewer independent libraries sequenced more deeply, an effect that has previously been analyzed in the context of variant detection79.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinrich, V., Stange, J., Dickhaus, T., Imkeller, P., Krüger, U., Bauer, S., Mundlos, S., Robinson, P. N., Hecht, J., & Krawitz, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Krawitz, Peter M.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2011-11-29
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
2426-2431
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2144523701
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KR 3985/1-1, DFG KR 3985/1-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
allele frequency distribution, branching processes, heterozygous mutation, variant calling, sequencing error rate, technical replicates, sequencing depth, human exome, variant detection sensitivity
MeSH terms
Alleles, Gene Frequency, Heterozygote, Humans, Stochastic Processes, Sequence Analysis, DNA, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review