scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Single cell RNA-seq has revolutionized transcriptomics by providing cell type resolution for differential gene expression and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses. However, efficient power analysis methods for single cell data and inter-individual comparisons are lacking. Here, we present scPower; a statistical framework for the design and power analysis of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic experiments. We modelled the relationship between sample size, the number of cells per individual, sequencing depth, and the power of detecting differentially expressed genes within cell types. We systematically evaluated these optimal parameter combinations for several single cell profiling platforms, and generated broad recommendations. In general, shallow sequencing of high numbers of cells leads to higher overall power than deep sequencing of fewer cells. The model, including priors, is implemented as an R package and is accessible as a web tool. scPower is a highly customizable tool that experimentalists can use to quickly compare a multitude of experimental designs and optimize for a limited budget.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
scPower is an analytic power-analysis framework for designing multi-sample single-cell transcriptomic experiments analyzed with pseudobulk, modeling sample size, cells per individual, and read depth to detect DEGs/eQTLs and rare cell types. It is implemented as an R package and web tool and is orders of magnitude faster than simulation-based methods.
Key findings
- Shallow sequencing of high numbers of cells generally yields higher overall power than deep sequencing of fewer cells; the number of cells per individual is a major determinant of power.
- Predicted and observed numbers of expressed genes were highly correlated (all r² > 0.9 in training and independent PBMC validation; r² = 0.995 for Drop-seq and r² = 0.991 for Smart-seq2).
- Example maximum overall detection power was 74% for DE genes (iCLL vs mCLL priors; 3000 cells per cell type and individual, total balanced sample size 20, FDR-adjusted) and 64% for eQTL genes (200 individuals, 3000 cells per cell type and individual; Blueprint T cell priors).
- Runtime and memory were much lower than simulations: Fig. 3c–e took 8 days for powsimR, 3 days for muscat, and less than a minute for scPower; 20 samples with 3000 cells per sample used 48 GB for powsimR and 35 GB for muscat versus few MB for scPower. Budget examples found optimal DE parameters of 1200 cells in 4 samples at 30,000 reads for 10,000€, and optimal eQTL parameters of 1500 cells in 242 samples at 10,000 reads for 30,000€.
Methods
- Analytic framework for pseudobulk multi-sample comparisons: models expression probability using negative binomial and gamma-mixture priors, and DE/eQTL power using negative binomial regression and linear models/F-tests with FDR or FWER adjustment.
- Priors were derived from single-cell atlases: 10X PBMC training data from 14 healthy individuals, an independent PBMC validation set, Drop-seq lung data, and Smart-seq2 pancreas data; effect sizes came from FACS-sorted bulk RNA-seq DEG and eQTL studies.
- Benchmarked against powsimR and muscat simulations and a self-implemented eQTL simulation; cost optimization evaluated sample size, cells per sample, and read depth under fixed budgets.
Limitations
- Stated: data-driven priors reliably assess power only for sample sizes smaller than or roughly equal to the pilot data; larger samples may identify new significant DEGs with lower effect sizes not included in the priors. Priors affect the optimal design and should be selected carefully.
- Stated: the pseudobulk approach requires a discrete cell type definition, so continuous annotations such as pseudotime would need discretization. The default doublet rate is a lower bound, and actual experiments may have higher doublet rates and fewer usable cells; expression threshold choice also influences optimal parameters.
- Stated: recommendations are optimized for differential expression between individuals; other applications such as co-expression analysis, rare cell type annotation, and variance QTL detection may have different optimal designs, and variance QTLs were not addressed due to lack of data-driven priors.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 88 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
In general, shallow sequencing of high numbers of cells leads to higher overall power than deep sequencing of fewer cells.
“In general, shallow sequencing of high numbers of cells leads to higher overall power than deep sequencing of fewer cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The observed numbers of expressed genes are closely matched by the expectation under scPower's model.
“The observed numbers of expressed genes (solid lines) are closely matched by the expectation under our model (dashed lines), shown here with example cutoffs of counts greater than ten and zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of cells required for each individual to detect a minimal number of cells of a specific type is most strongly affected by the frequency of the cell type and only to a smaller degree by the number of individuals.
“The comparison for varying numbers of individuals shows that the number of cells required for each individual is most strongly affected by the frequency of the cell type and only to a smaller degree by the number of individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of expressed genes per cell type depends on the number of cells of the cell type and the read depth.
“Subsampling of our data shows that the number of expressed genes per cell type depends on the number of cells of the cell type and the read depth (Fig. 2b, c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using fold changes from a study comparing CLL subtypes iCLL vs mCLL as effect size priors, the maximum overall detection power is 74%.
“Using fold changes from a study comparing CLL subtypes iCLL vs mCLL53 as effect size priors (sample size of 6, 84 DEGs with median absolute log fold change of 2.8) we find a maximum overall detection power of 74% (Fig. 3a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Rendeiro, A. F. et al. Chromatin accessibility maps of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia identify subtype-specific epigenome signatures and transcription regulatory networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 11938 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
The pseudobulk count distribution derived from single cell expression distributions is a negative binomial distribution.
“This pseudobulk count distribution is again a negative binomial distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The parameters of the mixture distribution for cell type specific expression are linearly dependent on the average UMI counts.
“Subsampling the read depth of our data shows that the parameters of the mixture distribution are linearly dependent on the average UMI counts (Supplementary Fig. S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Predicted and observed numbers of expressed genes were highly correlated (all r2 > 0.9).
“Predicted and observed numbers of expressed genes were highly correlated (all r2 > 0.9, Supplementary Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The mean and dispersion of the pseudobulk count distribution are scaled by the number of cells per individual and cell type.
“Its mean and dispersion are scaled by the number of cells per individual and cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A maximal detection power of 64% was found for an eQTL study with a sample size of 200 individuals and 3,000 measured cells per cell type and individual.
“A maximal detection power of 64% was found for a sample size of 200 individuals and 3,000 measured cells per cell type and individual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Simulating batch effects showed a clear drop in power, especially if the magnitude of the batch effect is larger than the effect size of DEGs.
“Simulating batch effects showed a clear drop in power, especially if the magnitude of the batch effect is larger than the effect size of DEGs (Supplementary Fig. S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The overall trends when comparing different experimental designs are in good agreement between scPower and all analysis methods applied to the simulated reads.
“The overall trends when comparing different experimental designs are in good agreement between scPower and all analysis methods applied to the simulated reads.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the DE study, a similar trade-off trend exists for read depth.
“A similar trend exists for the read depth (Fig. 4d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Different cell type proportions in both groups can lead to a reduction of power.
“A second source that can lead to a reduction of power are different cell type proportions in both groups (Supplementary Fig. S16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the eQTL example with a budget of 30,000€, optimal parameter combinations were identified.
“In this scenario, the optimal parameter combinations are identified for a DE study with a budget of 10,000€ (Fig. 4a) and for an eQTL study with a budget of 30,000€ (Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the DE example with a budget of 10,000€, optimal parameter combinations were identified.
“In this scenario, the optimal parameter combinations are identified for a DE study with a budget of 10,000€ (Fig. 4a) and for an eQTL study with a budget of 30,000€ (Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall detection power for eQTL genes shows a stronger effect of the sample size, which increases the eQTL power.
“Overall detection power for eQTL genes (Fig. 3b) shows a stronger effect of the sample size, which increases the eQTL power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Measuring more cells per individual increases the expression probability and overall detection power.
“Measuring more cells per individual increases the expression probability and so the overall detection power (Fig. 4c)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The counts of each gene in each cell type follow a negative binomial distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The distribution of mean values over all genes in a cell type is a mixture of a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The relationship between mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters is linear.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with increasing read depth leading to saturation of UMIs.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Overall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
- Findingreasoning
The memory requirements of scPower are much lower than those of simulation-based methods, as no count matrices are generated.
“Also the memory requirements are much lower, as no count matrices are generated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In our own data set and published studies, doublet rates are slightly higher than shown in reference 77.
“However, we observe in our own data set as well as in published studies47,78 slightly higher doublet rates than shown in77.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [47] Kang, H. M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 89–94 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] van der Wijst, M. G. P. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies celltype-specific cis-eQTLs and co-expression QTLs. Nat. Genet. 50, 493–497 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [77] 10X Genomics. User Guides — 10x Genomics. 10x Genomics https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/user-guides/ (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
In the prototypic eQTL scenario, the effect of cells per individual on power is least pronounced.
“This effect is least pronounced in the prototypic eQTL scenario (Fig. 5b), where small effect sizes require large sample sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Despite overloading decreasing usable cells and singlet read depth, overall detection power still rises strongly for both DE and eQTL studies.
“Even though overloading leads to a decreasing number of usable cells and a decreasing read depth of the singlets, as doublets contain more reads, the overall detection power still rises strongly for both DE and eQTL studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the Smart-seq2 pancreas study, the overall observed power is lower.
“For the Smart-seq2 pancreas study, the overall observed power is lower.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Expression probability depends mostly on cells per sample and read depth.
“Again a balance of the eQTL power, which depends mostly on the sample size, and the expression probability, which depends mostly on the cells per sample and the read depth, is visible (Fig. 4e–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The adapted expression probability model for Drop-seq and Smart-seq2 performs as well as for 10X Genomics, with r2 = 0.995 and r2 = 0.991, respectively.
“With these adaptations, our expression probability model (Supplementary Fig. S18) for both Drop-seq and Smart-seq2 performs as well as for 10X Genomics with r2 = 0.995 and r2 = 0.991, respectively (Supplementary Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The counts of each gene in each cell type follow a negative binomial distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The distribution of mean values over all genes in a cell type is a mixture of a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The relationship between mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters is linear.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with increasing read depth leading to saturation of UMIs.
- Findingreasoning
For most DEG scenarios, the number of reads per cell is increased before increasing sample size.
“For most DEG scenarios, the number of reads per cell is increased before increasing the sample size (Fig. 5a,c)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
eQTL power depends mostly on sample size.
“Again a balance of the eQTL power, which depends mostly on the sample size, and the expression probability, which depends mostly on the cells per sample and the read depth, is visible (Fig. 4e–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of cells per individual is the major determinant of power in the optimization across scenarios.
“We observed that the number of cells per individual is the major determinant of power, as this is the variable that is either directly set to maximum values or increased first in the optimization (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The number of cells is crucial for power to find DE/eQTL genes by increasing sensitivity of gene expression detection.
“We show that the number of cells is not only crucial for the power to detect rare cell types37,38 but also for the power to find DE/eQTL genes by increasing the sensitivity of gene expression detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Hafemeister, C. How Many Cells. https://satijalab.org/howmanycells (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Abrams, D., Kumar, P., Karuturi, R. K. M. & George, J. A computational method to aid the design and analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments for cell type identification. BMC Bioinforma. 20, 275 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In our evaluation, a sample size of 20 with 3000 cells per sample required between 35 GB (muscat) and 48 GB (powsimR).
“A sample size of 20 with 3000 cells per sample required already between 35 GB (muscat) and 48GB (powsimR) in our evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The optimal read depths were ~10,000 in most evaluations, relatively low compared to previous recommendations.
“Specifically, we found the optimal read depths to be ~10,000 in most evaluations, which is relatively low compared to previous recommendations34–36,80,81.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [34] Wu, A. R. et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 11, 41–46 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381–387 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol. Cell 65, 631–643.e4 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [80] Lafzi, A., Moutinho, C., Picelli, S. & Heyn, H. Tutorial: guidelines for the experimental design of single-cell RNA sequencing studies. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2742–2757 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] 10x Genomics. What is the recommended sequencing depth for Single Cell 3′ and 5' Gene Expression libraries? 10X Genomics https://kb.10xgenomics.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002022743-What-is-the-recommended-sequencing-depth-for-Single-Cell-3-and-5-Gene-Expression-libraries- (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Analytical models such as scPower are by orders of magnitude faster than comparable simulation-based tools.
“However, analytical models, such as our framework, are by orders of magnitude faster than comparable simulation-based tools.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The default doublet rate is based on 10X Genomics reference values and is a lower bound compared to doublet rates estimated for our own data and reported by other studies.
“The default for the doublet rate is based on reference values from 10X Genomics and is a lower bound compared to the doublet rates we estimate for our own data and to rates reported by other studies47,78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Kang, H. M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 89–94 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] van der Wijst, M. G. P. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies celltype-specific cis-eQTLs and co-expression QTLs. Nat. Genet. 50, 493–497 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The parameters of the mean-dispersion curve showed no correlation with mean UMI counts.
“The parameters of the mean-dispersion curve showed no correlation with the mean UMI counts, therefore the mean of the parameters of the dispersion function across all runs and subsampled runs were taken, resulting in one mean-dispersion function per cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Fitting each sample separately decreases the number of expressed genes quite drastically if not a sufficient number of cells are available for each sample.
“We noticed that fitting each sample separately decreases the number of expressed genes quite drastically, if not a sufficient number of cells are available for each sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
For both data sets, cell type frequencies varied greatly among individuals, so estimation of expressed genes in a certain fraction of individuals could not be validated, as this requires similar cell type frequencies for each donor.
“For both data sets, the cell type frequencies varied greatly among individuals, therefore an estimation of expressed genes in a certain fraction of individuals could not be validated, as this requires similar cell type frequencies for each donor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Efficient power analysis methods for single cell data and inter-individual comparisons are lacking.
“However, efficient power analysis methods for single cell data and inter-individual comparisons are lacking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Bulk RNA-seq power analysis methods fail to take into account specific characteristics of single cell data.
“In principle methods for bulk RNA-seq power analysis could also be applied to compute power or minimally required sample sizes for given effect sizes for single cell experiments, however they fail to take into account specific characteristics of single cell data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The influence of sample size on power is not pronounced in the CLL example due to the small sample size of the reference study.
“The influence of the sample size is not so pronounced in this example due to the small sample size of the reference study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Comparing scPower against established simulation-based approaches validates its power estimates.
“Comparing our method against established simulation-based approaches validates our power estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model can generalize well between data sets and different experimental parameters.
“The observed numbers are closely matched by the expectation under our model (all r2 > 0.9), which demonstrates that it can generalize well between data sets and different experimental parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It is valid to apply analytical methods for the power analysis of negative binomial regression models.
“Hence, it is valid to apply analytical methods for the power analysis of negative binomial regression models64.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Zhu, H. & Lakkis, H. Sample size calculation for comparing two negative binomial rates. Stat. Med. 33, 376–387 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Even power analysis for a single experiment with a large sample size can be very memory and runtime intensive.
“Even power analysis for a single experiment with a large sample size can be very memory and runtime intensive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For eQTL analysis, power calculations are based on linear models.
“For eQTL analysis, power calculations are based on linear models20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Hillsdale, 1989).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Simulation-based studies have long runtimes, which make them unsuitable to evaluate the large number of experimental designs needed to optimize parameter combinations.
“A big disadvantage of simulation-based studies are their long runtimes, which make them unsuitable to evaluate the large number of experimental designs needed to optimize parameter combinations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The pseudobulk approach in combination with classical differential gene expression methods such as edgeR and limma-voom outperforms single cell specific methods and mixed models in multi-sample DE analysis.
“Two benchmarking studies, one applying the aforementioned simulation tool and one using different example data sets, demonstrated that the “pseudobulk” approach in combination with classical differential gene expression methods such as edgeR44 and limma-voom45 outperforms single cell specific methods and mixed models in multi sample DE analysis43,46.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.435024. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Following this strategy, scPower power estimations stay accurate in experiments with batch effects, given that they are adjusted for in the analysis.
“Following this strategy, we could recover the same power as in experiments without batch effects, i.e., our power estimations stay accurate in experiments with batch effects, given that they are adjusted for in the analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: An unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases is assumed for batch effect correction.
- Interpretationreasoning
With this model for power estimation in DE and eQTL single cell studies, scPower can optimize the experimental design for a fixed budget.
“With this model for power estimation in DE and eQTL single cell studies in place, we are now able to optimize the experimental design for a fixed budget.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The eQTL power showed good agreement between the simulated and analytic values.
“Therefore, we focus on benchmarking the eQTL power, which showed good agreement between the simulated and analytic values (Fig. 3f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The simulation-based power estimates from the adapted version of powsimR as well as from muscat matched the estimates from scPower very well.
“The simulation based power estimates from the adapted version of powsimR as well as from muscat matched the estimates from scPower very well (Fig. 3c–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
Doublet detection methods such as Demuxlet and Scrublet enable faithful detection of doublets to exclude them from downstream analysis.
“Doublet detection methods such as Demuxlet47 and Scrublet76 enable faithful detection of those to exclude the doublets from the downstream analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Kang, H. M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 89–94 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [76] Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: Computational Identification of Cell Doublets in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. Cell Syst. 8, 281–291.e9 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Our results support previous evaluations that demonstrated the benefit of overloading.
“This supports previous evaluations that demonstrated the benefit of overloading50.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The power calculations are in good agreement with simulation-based estimates.
“Furthermore, the power calculations are in good agreement with simulation based estimates (Supplementary Fig. S19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Simulation-based methods allow assessing complex single cell multi-sample data, including cell-to-cell heterogeneities other than differential gene expression.
“These simulations allow for assessing complex single cell multi-sample data, including scenarios of cell to cell heterogeneities other than differential gene expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The modeled doublet rate is considered a lower bound estimation.
“Therefore, we consider the modeled doublet rate as a lower bound estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous experimental design methods for multi-sample scRNA-seq are based on simulations.
“Previous experimental design methods for multi-sample scRNA-seq43 are based on simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
With a high detection rate of doublets, overloading lanes is highly beneficial because larger numbers of cells per individual increase detection power without additional library preparation costs.
“With a high detection rate of doublets, overloading of lanes is highly beneficial, since larger numbers of cells per individual lead to an increase in detection power, while not causing additional library preparation costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Increasing the number of cells per lane leads to higher numbers of doublets.
“In the cost optimization, we also took into account that increasing the number of cells per lane leads to higher numbers of doublets, i.e., droplets with two instead of one cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] 10X Genomics. User Guides — 10x Genomics. 10x Genomics https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/user-guides/ (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first analytic investigation is limited to eQTL analysis and does not cover DE studies.
“Third, it is limited to eQTL analysis and does not cover DE studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
scPower enables users to evaluate their target experiment to identify use-case specific optimal parameter combinations.
“This enables the user the evaluation of his target experiment in order to identify the use-case specific optimal parameter combination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
We expect to accurately quantify gene expression levels with the optimized experimental design.
“Hence, we expect to accurately quantify the gene expression levels with the optimized experimental design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The first analytic investigation provided no generalizable tool.
“Second, it provided no generalizable tool.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Multiple independent library preparations in individual cells likely lead to improved sampling of the transcriptome compared to fewer independent libraries sequenced more deeply.
“Most likely, multiple independent library preparations in individual cells lead to an improved sampling of the transcriptome as compared to fewer independent libraries sequenced more deeply, an effect that has previously been analyzed in the context of variant detection79.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Heinrich, V. et al. The allele distribution in next-generation sequencing data sets is accurately described as the result of a stochastic branching process. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2426–2431 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The number of cells and sequencing depth also determine accurate cell type annotation.
“On top of the DE/eQTL power, the number of cells and sequencing depth also determine accurate cell type annotation82.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Heimberg, G., Bhatnagar, R., El-Samad, H. & Thomson, M. Low dimensionality in gene expression data enables the accurate extraction of transcriptional programs from shallow sequencing. Cell Syst. 2, 239–250 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first analytic investigation was based solely on effective sample size, ignoring actual effect sizes and expression strength of eQTL genes.
“First, it was based solely on the effective sample size, ignoring actual effect sizes and expression strength of eQTL genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Larger data sets with hundreds of samples, as required for eQTL studies, will be very difficult to simulate.
“Therefore, larger data sets with hundreds of samples, as required for eQTL studies, will be very difficult to simulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Aggregating shallowly sequenced transcriptomes of a large number of cells of the same cell type is more cost efficient than increasing read depth to increase sensitivity for individual-level gene expression analysis.
“In line with Mandric et al.50, our analyses suggest that aggregating shallowly sequenced transcriptomes of a large number of cells of the same cell type is a more cost efficient way than increasing read depth to increase the sensitivity for individual level gene expression analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Data-driven priors only allow reliable assessment of overall power in sample sizes smaller or roughly equal to the pilot data sample size.
“Of note, our data driven priors only allow for reliably assessing the overall power in sample sizes that are smaller or roughly equal to the sample size of the pilot data sets from which the effect sizes were estimated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A larger sample size will identify new significant DEGs with lower effect sizes not identified in the smaller pilot study and thus not included in overall detection power computation.
“Consequently, a larger sample size will identify new significant DEGs with lower effect sizes, which were not identified in the smaller pilot study and thus not included in the computation of the overall detection power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The strategy of optimizing thresholds is likely to increase the number of false positives.
“However, the user needs to be aware that this strategy is likely increasing the number of false positives18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Soneson, C. & Robinson, M. D. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 15, 255–261 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Continuous cell annotations such as pseudotime would need to be discretized before power analysis.
“Therefore, continuous cell annotations such as pseudo time would need to be discretized before the power analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The probability to detect at least a certain number of cells of a specific cell type in each individual depends on cell type frequency, cells per individual, and number of individuals.
“The probability to detect at least cells of a specific cell type in each individual depends on the frequency of the cell type , the number of cells per individual and the number of individuals .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Hafemeister, C. How Many Cells. https://satijalab.org/howmanycells (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Based on the probability integral transform, the distribution of p values for true null hypotheses is uniform.
“Based on the probability integral transform, the distribution of p values for the true null hypotheses is uniform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Zhu et al. method 3 for dispersion parameter estimation was shown to be more accurate in simulation studies.
“Zhu et al. implemented three different methods to estimate the dispersion parameter, we chose method 3 for the power calculation, which was shown to be more accurate in simulation studies in the paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
eQTL power is a function of mean expression level.
“Therefore, the eQTL power is a function of the mean expression level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Realistic DE and eQTL priors (effect sizes and expression ranks) were taken from sorted bulk RNA-seq studies of matching tissues (PBMCs, lung and pancreas).
“Realistic DE and eQTL priors, i.e., effect sizes and expression ranks, were taken from sorted bulk RNA-seq studies of matching tissues (PBMCs, lung and pancreas).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There are deviations in RNA content between different cell types.
“The gene expression distribution of each cell type was modeled separately because there are deviations in RNA content between different cell types33.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Monaco, G. et al. RNA-Seq signatures normalized by mRNA abundance allow absolute deconvolution of human immune cell types. Cell Rep. 26, 1627–1640.e7 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cell type frequencies in PBMC are approximately twice as high as in whole blood.
“The cell type frequencies were obtained by literature research, the frequencies in PBMC are approximately twice as high as in whole blood92.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Bio-Rad. Cell frequencies in common samples - Flow Cytometry analysis | Bio-Rad. Bio-Rad https://www.bio-rad-antibodies.com/flow-cytometry-cell-frequency.html.
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The expression probability model was validated for other tissues and single cell RNA-seq technologies.
“We validated our expression probability model for other tissues and single cell RNA-seq technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Depending on the number of doublets, the read depth of the singlets will be slightly lower than the target read depth.
“Therefore, depending on the number of doublets, the read depth of the singlets will be slightly lower than the target read depth.17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Doublets contain 80% more reads than singlets.
- Interpretationreasoning
The same model can be used for Drop-seq, only adapting the doublet and cost parameter.
“The same model can be used, only adapting the doublet and cost parameter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Gene length is required as a prior for dispersion estimation and power calculation, as DEseq uses counts that are not normalized for gene length.
“The gamma mixed distribution of the mean gene expression levels is modelled using length normalized counts, but the gene length is required as a prior for the dispersion estimation and the power calculation, as DEseq uses counts, which are not normalized for gene length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The cost can be calculated dependent on three cost determining parameters: sample size, number of cells per sample, and read depth.
“It can be calculated dependent on the three cost determining parameters sample size , number of cells per sample and the read depth .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 66
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 63
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor large mean values, eQTL power is estimated analytically; for small mean values, the approximation can be imprecise and simulations are used that take the discrete nature of scRNA-seq into account.
“For large mean values, the power is estimated analytically, for small mean values, this approximation can be imprecise and instead simulations are used that take the discrete nature of scRNA-seq into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBoth the expression probability and the DE/eQTL power depend on the mean and dispersion of expression levels of the gene.
“In addition, both the expression probability and the DE/eQTL power depend on the mean and dispersion of expression levels of gene .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor this parameter combination and prior, the DE power would reach 98% for all DE genes of the study, but only 74% are likely to be expressed.
“For this parameter combination and prior, the DE power would reach even 98% for all DE genes of the study, however, only 74% are likely to be expressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSimilar detection ranges are found for the comparison of other CLL subtypes in the same study, while the detection power in a study of systemic sclerosis vs control were much lower with values up to 30%.
“Similar detection ranges are found for the comparison of other CLL subtypes in the same study, while the detection power in a study of systemic sclerosis vs control were much lower with values up to 30% (Supplementary Fig. S10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSmart-seq2 data showed zero-inflation on the single cell level, but aggregation to pseudobulk removed the excess of zero values.
“In contrast to the other technologies, the Smart-seq2 data showed zero-inflation on the single cell level (see also68,69), but aggregation to pseudobulk removed the excess of zero values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [68] Chen, W. et al. UMI-count modeling and differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 19, 70 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [69] Svensson, V. Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated. https://doi.org/10.1101/582064. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis maximum overall detection power of 74% is reached with 3000 cells per cell type and individual, a total balanced sample size of 20, and FDR adjusted p values.
“This power is reached with the experimental parameters of 3000 cells per cell type and individual, a total balanced sample size of 20, i.e., 10 individuals per group, and FDR adjusted p values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningscPower's analytic method can efficiently test a multitude of design options, making it suitable for the optimization of experimental parameters.
“In contrast to simulation-based methods, our analytic method can efficiently test a multitude of design options, making it suitable for the optimization of experimental parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, DE power increases with higher number of measured cells and higher sample sizes, while expression probability is mainly influenced by the number of measured cells.
“Overall, the DE power increases with higher number of measured cells and higher sample sizes, while the expression probability is mainly influenced by the number of measured cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenpowsimR and muscat differ slightly, caused by different modelling assumptions.
“Furthermore, powsimR and muscat differ slightly, caused by different modelling assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningFor the DE example, the percentage threshold is 50% due to the balanced DE design.
“For our DE example, this results in a percentage threshold of 50% due to the balanced DE design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe observed power also depends on analysis choices such as the DE method, with scPower estimates being most accurate when using edgeR.
“Running simulations with different DE methods showed that the observed power also depends on analysis choices such as the DE method with scPower estimates being most accurate when using edgeR (Supplementary Fig. S13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe installation of scPower is easier due to less dependencies: 11 dependencies of scPower vs. 82 dependencies of powsimR and 28 dependencies of muscat.
“In addition the installation of scPower is easier due to less dependencies: 11 dependencies of scPower vs. 82 dependencies of powsimR and 28 dependencies of muscat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor the DE study with the specific prior combination and a budget of 10,000€, the optimal parameters are measuring 1200 cells per individual in 4 samples with a read depth of 30,000.
“For the DE study with this specific prior combination, the optimal parameters are measuring 1200 cells in 4 samples with a read depth of 30,000.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The counts of each gene in each cell type follow a negative binomial distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The distribution of mean values over all genes in a cell type is a mixture of a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The relationship between mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters is linear.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with increasing read depth leading to saturation of UMIs.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Overall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor simulation-based methods, memory requirements increase with larger sample size and numbers of cells, leading for example for 20 samples and 3000 cells per sample to 48GB used memory for powsimR and 35GB used memory for muscat compared to the parameter-independent requirements of scPower of few MB.
“For the simulation-based methods the memory requirements increase with larger sample size and numbers of cells, leading for example for 20 samples and 3000 cells per sample to 48GB used memory for powsimR and 35GB used memory for muscat compared to the parameter-independent requirements of scPower of few MB (Fig. 3h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningDue to the fixed budget, measuring more cells per individual goes hand in hand with measuring fewer samples, which decreases DE power.
“but due to the fixed budget this goes hand in hand with measuring less samples which decreases the DE power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Blueprint eQTL data set also contains eQTLs from monocytes where the same trend is observed and a maximal detection power of 65% was found.
“The Blueprint eQTL data set also contains eQTLs from monocytes where we observe the same trend and found a maximal detection power of 65% (Supplementary Fig. S11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIncreasing the number of cells per individual increases both the expression probability and the eQTL power by shifting the expression mean of the pseudobulk counts to higher values.
“Increasing the number of cells per individual increases both the expression probability and the eQTL power by shifting the expression mean of the pseudo bulk counts to higher values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe analytic calculations of scPower are orders of magnitude faster than the simulation-based approaches: calculations for Fig. 3c-e took 8 days for powsimR, 3 days for muscat and less than a minute for scPower.
“The analytic calculations of scPower are orders of magnitude faster than the simulation-based approaches: calculations for Fig. 3c–e took 8 days for powsimR, 3 days for muscat and less than a minute for scPower (Fig. 3g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor the eQTL study with the specific prior combination and a budget of 30,000€, the optimal parameters are measuring 1500 cells per individual in 242 samples with a read depth of 10,000.
“For the eQTL study with this specific prior combination, the optimal parameters are measuring 1500 cells in 242 samples with a read depth of 10,000.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The counts of each gene in each cell type follow a negative binomial distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The distribution of mean values over all genes in a cell type is a mixture of a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The relationship between mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters is linear.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with increasing read depth leading to saturation of UMIs.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Overall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Drop-seq lung data, similar trends as for 10X PBMC are observed, with cells per individual being the major determinant of power.
“For the Drop-seq lung data we observe similar trends as for the 10X PBMC data set, with the number of cells per individual being the major determinant of power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing FWER adjustment for DE power changes observed overall power but leads to very similar optimal parameter combinations and the same trends overall.
“Using FWER adjustment for DE power changes the observed overall power, but leads to very similar optimal parameter combinations and the same trends overall (Supplementary Fig. S17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Smart-seq2, in contrast to 10X Genomics and Drop-seq, the optimal number of reads per cell is much higher, and cells per individual and sample size are only increased at higher budgets for both prototypic and data-driven priors.
“In contrast to 10X Genomics and Drop-seq, the optimal number of reads per cell is much higher and the number of cells per individual and sample size is only increased at higher budgets for both the prototypic and data driven priors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenSmall effect sizes require large sample sizes.
“where small effect sizes require large sample sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor eQTL scenarios, increasing sample size first is more beneficial than increasing read depth, which remains relatively low at 10,000 reads per cell.
“For eQTL scenarios, increasing the sample size first is more beneficial than increasing the read depth (Fig. 5b,d), which remains relatively low (10,000 reads per cell).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAnalytical models require only a small amount of memory independent of assessed parameters, while simulation of larger sample sizes leads to increasing memory usage.
“In addition, analytical models require only a small amount of memory independent of the assessed experimental parameters, while simulation of data sets with larger sample sizes lead to increasing memory usage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe optimal sample size is mostly dependent on effect size; low effect sizes require large sample sizes, and optimal settings with high sample size typically lead to low sequencing depth and relatively low number of cells.
“The optimal sample size is mostly dependent on the effect size, with low effect sizes requiring large sample sizes and consequently optimal setting with high sample size typically lead to low sequencing depth and relatively low number of cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenPriors affect the optimal design.
“In general, priors affect the optimal design and should therefore be selected carefully.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe identified optimal thresholds are low and increase the number of detectable genes.
“The identified optimal thresholds are low and increase the number of detectable genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe choice of threshold on reads required for a gene to be called expressed influences the choice of optimal parameters.
“The choice of a threshold on the number of reads required for a gene to be called expressed also influences the choice of optimal parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese percentages correspond to 1-10 reads per million sequenced, translating to 1-5 UMI counts for a median of around 5000 UMI counts per cell in our data set.
“These percentages correspond to 1–10 reads per million sequenced, which translates to 1–5 UMI counts for a median of around 5000 UMI counts per cell in our data set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor genes with small mean values, normalization might not be effective and analytical F-test power is overestimated.
“However, for genes with small mean values, i.e., only very few non-zero counts, this normalization might not be effective and the power is overestimated by the analytical power calculation based on the F-test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationTaylor approximation of dispersion parameter was not accurate enough, so numerical optimization was used.
“Since the Taylor approximation of the dispersion parameter45 was not accurate enough, we used instead a numerical optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataA similar standard deviation was also observed in the pilot data.
“A similar standard deviation was also observed in the pilot data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the DEseq dispersion model, a linear relationship with read depth was observed, which was not visible for Drop-seq and 10X Genomics.
“We observed for the parameter of the DEseq dispersion model a linear relationship with the read depth, which was not visible for Drop-seq and 10X Genomics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn scRNA-seq experiments, individual cells are typically not sequenced to saturation, leading to sparse count matrices, where only highly expressed genes are detected with counts greater than zero.
“In scRNA-seq experiments, individual cells are typically not sequenced to saturation, leading to sparse count matrices, where only highly expressed genes are detected with counts greater than zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [34] Wu, A. R. et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 11, 41–46 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381–387 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol. Cell 65, 631–643.e4 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe overall number of transcripts as well as the number of transcripts of individual genes can be highly cell type specific.
“In addition, the overall number of transcripts as well as the number of transcripts of individual genes can be highly cell type specific33.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Monaco, G. et al. RNA-Seq signatures normalized by mRNA abundance allow absolute deconvolution of human immune cell types. Cell Rep. 26, 1627–1640.e7 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA first analytic exploration of different experimental designs for single cell eQTL studies showed the importance of optimizing parameters for a restricted budget, as shallow sequencing of more samples can increase the effective sample size.
“A first analytic exploration of different experimental designs for single cell eQTL studies showed the importance of the optimizing parameters for a restricted budget50, as shallow sequencing of more samples can increase the effective sample size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPotential weaker effect sizes that would be identified with larger sample sizes could not be considered in the priors, which leads to a low required sample size for the power estimation.
“Potential weaker effect sizes that would be identified with larger sample sizes could not be considered in the priors, which leads to a low required sample size for the power estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSmaller absolute fold changes in the systemic sclerosis study decrease the DE power and therefore also the overall detection power.
“Smaller absolute fold changes in this study decrease the DE power and therefore also the overall detection power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe first analytic exploration provided no generalizable tool that can be applied on other data sets, is missing an exact power estimation based on effect size priors, and is not applicable for DEG analysis.
“However, the analysis provided no generalizable tool that can be applied on other data sets and is missing an exact power estimation based on effect size priors. Furthermore, it is not applicable for DEG analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll training data sets could be modelled by negative binomial distributions after pseudobulk transformation and showed no evidence of zero inflation.
“We verified that all our training data sets could be modelled by negative binomial distributions after pseudobulk transformation and found no evidence of zero inflation (Supplementary Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn order to identify a gene as an DEG/eQTL gene, it must be both expressed and exceeding the significance cutoff.
“In order to identify a gene as an DEG/eQTL gene, it must be both expressed and exceeding the significance cutoff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis introduces a dependency between eQTL power and the expression mean, and thus eQTL power is considered conditional on the mean.
“This introduces a dependency between the eQTL power and the expression mean and thus eQTL power is considered conditional on the mean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHandling more complex designs is not easily accomplished with simulation based methods, but could be achieved with analytical power analysis methods.
“In addition, handling more complex designs is not easily accomplished with simulation based methods, but could be achieved with analytical power analysis methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere currently exists no power estimation method for single cell eQTL that explicitly accounts for specific effect size priors.
“Contrary to DE analysis, there currently exists no power estimation method for single cell eQTL that explicitly accounts for specific effect size priors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe expression cutoff should correspond to the percentage of samples in the smaller group.
“We followed the recommendation of edgeR75 that the expression cutoff should correspond to the percentage of samples in the smaller group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Chen, Y., Lun, A. T. L. & Smyth, G. K. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res. 5, 1438 (2016).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationUnder an unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases, batch effects can be removed by adding a batch covariate to the regression model, and this increases power compared to non-batch corrected analyses.
“However, under the assumptions of an unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases, batch effects can be removed by adding a batch covariate to the regression model71. This increases the power compared to non-batch corrected analyses72–74.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [71] Chen, W. et al. A comparison of methods accounting for batch effects in differential expression analysis of UMI count based single cell RNA sequencing. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 861–873 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Hernández, A. V., Steyerberg, E. W. & Habbema, J. D. F. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57, 454–460 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73] Stegle, O., Parts, L., Piipari, M., Winn, J. & Durbin, R. Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat. Protoc. 7, 500–507 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] Kahan, B. C., Jairath, V., Doré, C. J. & Morris, T. P. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials 15, 139 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: An unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases is assumed for batch effect correction.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA conservative power estimation can be achieved by setting the expected cell type frequency to the frequency of the smaller group, which represents a good lower bound estimation, especially in cases with small sample sizes.
“In this case, a conservative power estimation can be achieved by setting the expected cell type frequency to the frequency of the smaller group. This represents a good lower bound estimation, especially in cases with small sample sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor the eQTL example, an eQTL with a minor allele frequency of 0.05 is considered, which is a common lower threshold for genetic variants tested for associations.
“For the eQTL example, we consider an eQTL with a minor allele frequency of 0.05, which is a common lower threshold for genetic variants tested for associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe higher cost of Smart-seq2 allows measuring much fewer cells, even though a higher number of samples and cells would be beneficial.
“This allows only to measure much fewer cells, even though a higher number of samples and cells would be beneficial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSmart-seq2 experiments are not less powerful per se; their significantly higher cost in multi-sample settings leads to less powerful designs when restricting budget.
“In general, we observe that Smart-seq2 experiments are not less powerful per se, but the significantly higher cost in the multi-sample setting leads to less powerful designs when restricting the budget.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown datascPower's power analysis framework is applicable to data sets for other tissues besides PBMC and other single cell technologies besides 10X Genomics.
“Our power analysis framework is applicable to data sets for other tissues besides PBMC and to other single cell technologies besides 10X Genomics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown datascPower generalizes across different tissues and scRNAseq technologies and provides means to design experiments maximizing biological discoveries.
“Our model generalizes across different tissues and scRNAseq technologies and provides the means to easily design experiments that maximize the number of biological discoveries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStrong effects can be detected with relatively few samples, while detection of expression requires deeper sequencing.
“indicating that strong effects can be detected with relatively few samples, while the detection of expression requires deeper sequencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe doublet detection and donor identification of Demuxlet was validated using PBMC data by comparing sex-specific gene expression with assigned donor sex, showing high concordance after doublet removal, including for overloaded run 5.
“We validated the doublet detection and donor identification of Demuxlet using our PBMC data set by comparing the expression of sex specific genes with the sex of the assigned donor (Supplementary Fig. S2b) and found high concordance after doublet removal, also for run 5, which was overloaded with 25,000 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe speed of analytical models enables evaluation of many experimental design options in a short time and identification of optimal parameters for a limited budget.
“This transformatively enables the evaluation of many experimental design options in a short time and thus to identify optimal experimental parameters for a limited budget.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese recommendations match our optimally determined parameters.
“These recommendations match our optimal determined parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a systematic analysis of spike-in expression, measurement accuracy is not strongly dependent on sequencing depth and is consistently high for 10,000 reads per cell.
“However, in a systematic analysis of spike-in expression it has been shown that the accuracy of the measurements is not strongly dependent on the sequencing depth and consistently high for a read depth of 10,000 reads per cell35.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381–387 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningscPower provides gene-level and overall power estimates based on prior data and is a generalizable tool for analytic power analysis of single cell DE and eQTL studies.
“In contrast, our approach provides gene level and overall power estimates based on prior data and we provide a generalizable tool for analytic power analysis of single cell DE and eQTL studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe negative binomial regression model for pseudobulk is currently the most powerful method for assessing individual-level differential expression.
“While the (negative binomial) regression model for pseudobulk is currently the most powerful method for assessing individual level differential expression43, it requires a discrete cell type definition and our approach is tightly linked to it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationShallow sequencing of more cells has been recommended for extracting gene expression programs required for annotations, because it achieves equal accuracy as deeper sequencing of fewer cells.
“Shallow sequencing of more cells has been recommended for extracting the gene expression programs required for annotations, because it has achieved equal accuracy as deeper sequencing of fewer cells50,82.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Heimberg, G., Bhatnagar, R., El-Samad, H. & Thomson, M. Low dimensionality in gene expression data enables the accurate extraction of transcriptional programs from shallow sequencing. Cell Syst. 2, 239–250 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA first analytic investigation of power optimization in single cell eQTL studies has been done but suffered from several limitations.
“A first analytic investigation of power optimization in single cell eQTL studies50 has been done, but suffered from several limitations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Mandric, I. et al. Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5504 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationscPower can be combined with specific power analysis tools for cell type annotation to ensure sufficient power.
“To ensure sufficient power for cell type annotation, our framework scPower can be combined with specific power analysis tools for cell type annotation38,82.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Abrams, D., Kumar, P., Karuturi, R. K. M. & George, J. A computational method to aid the design and analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments for cell type identification. BMC Bioinforma. 20, 275 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Heimberg, G., Bhatnagar, R., El-Samad, H. & Thomson, M. Low dimensionality in gene expression data enables the accurate extraction of transcriptional programs from shallow sequencing. Cell Syst. 2, 239–250 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBest practice guidelines for differential gene expression with RNA-seq recommend cutoffs that remove between 19 and 33% of lowly expressed genes, depending on the analysis pipeline.
“For this reason, best practice guidelines for differential gene expression with RNA-seq recommend cutoffs that remove between 19 and 33% of lowly expressed genes, depending on the analysis pipeline84.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] SEQC/MAQC-III Consortium. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 903–914 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe human cell atlas project aims to build a reference map of healthy human cells by iteratively sampling cells with increasing resolution.
“The human cell atlas project has made it its goal to build a reference map of healthy human cells by iteratively sampling the cells with increasing resolution61,85.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas. Elife 6, e27041 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas white paper. arXiv [q-bio.TO] (2018).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe gene expression probability model is cell type specific and has to be fitted based on realistic pilot data.
“Our gene expression probability model is cell type specific and has to be fitted based on realistic pilot data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWe did not address power for detection of variance QTLs from scRNAseq data due to lack of data-driven priors for effect sizes.
“Lastly, we did not address the power for the detection of variance QTLs (quantitative trait loci associated with gene expression variance across cells) from scRNAseq data48 due to the lack of data driven priors for the effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Sarkar, A. K. et al. Discovery and characterization of variance QTLs in human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS Genet 15, e1008045 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenscPower's experimental design recommendations are optimized for differential expression between individuals.
“When using our approach, the user should keep in mind that our experimental design recommendations are optimized for differential expression between individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe pseudobulk negative binomial regression model requires a discrete cell type definition, and scPower is tightly linked to it.
“While the (negative binomial) regression model for pseudobulk is currently the most powerful method for assessing individual level differential expression43, it requires a discrete cell type definition and our approach is tightly linked to it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome eQTL analyses of bulk RNAseq data advocate using >0 reads.
“In our examples we used a threshold of >10 and >3 reads, however, some eQTL analyses of bulk RNAseq data advocate using >0 reads70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Lappalainen, T. et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 501, 506–511 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCo-expression analysis requires a high number of quantified genes per cell, especially for cell type specific co-expression and comparison between individuals.
“For instance, co-expression analysis requires a high number of quantified genes per cell, especially when one is interested in cell type specific co-expression and comparison of such co-expression relations between individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningActual experiments might result in higher doublet rates and lower number of usable cells.
“Thus, actual experiments might result in higher doublet rates and lower number of usable cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe human cell atlas will create high-quality priors that will broaden the applicability of scPower.
“This will create high quality priors that will further broaden the applicability of scPower.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe model can be applied to data generated with 10X Genomics, Drop-seq, and Smart-seq2, and is likely applicable to similar technology platforms.
“We have shown that our model can be applied to data generated with 10X Genomics, Drop-seq and Smart-seq2 and we are confident that it is applicable to similar technology platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe power to annotate new rare cell types by clustering analysis of scRNA-seq data might have different optimal parameters.
“Furthermore, the power to annotate new rare cell types by clustering analysis of scRNA-seq data might have different optimal parameters38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Abrams, D., Kumar, P., Karuturi, R. K. M. & George, J. A computational method to aid the design and analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments for cell type identification. BMC Bioinforma. 20, 275 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOther applications might result in very different optimal experimental designs.
“Other applications might result in very different optimal experimental designs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningscPower will provide the foundation for building rational experimental design of interindividual gene expression comparisons with cell type resolution across a wide range of organ systems.
“We are convinced that scPower will provide the foundation for building rational experimental design of interindividual gene expression comparisons with cell type resolution across a wide range of organ systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenDE/eQTL power is computed using a significance threshold corrected for multiple testing, controlling either the family-wise error rate (FWER) or the false discovery rate (FDR).
“DE/eQTL power is computed using a significance threshold corrected for multiple testing, controlling either the family-wise error rate (FWER) or the false discovery rate (FDR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationLung cell type specific priors were obtained from a DE study of freshly isolated airway epithelial cells of asthma patients and healthy controls55.
“Lung cell type specific priors were obtained from a DE study of freshly isolated airway epithelial cells of asthma patients and healthy controls55.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Nicodemus-Johnson, J. et al. DNA methylation in lung cells is associated with asthma endotypes and genetic risk. JCI Insight 1, e90151 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA DE study analyzing age-dependent gene regulation in human pancreas56 was used to get pancreas cell type specific priors.
“A DE study analyzing age-dependent gene regulation in human pancreas56 was used to get pancreas cell type specific priors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Arda, H. E. et al. Age-dependent pancreatic gene regulation reveals mechanisms governing human β cell function. Cell Metab. 23, 909–920 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe authors used FDR adjustment for DE power and followed the GTEx consortium approach based on FWER adjustment for eQTL power.
“We used FDR adjustment for the DE power and followed the approach of the GTEx consortium63 based on FWER adjustment for the eQTL power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites GTEx consortium63
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFor eQTLs, the GTEx consortium approach assumes that for each gene on average 10 independent (uncorrelated) SNPs are tested in a genome-wide cis eQTL analysis.
“For eQTLs we followed the approach of the GTEX consortium63, which assumes that for each gene on average 10 independent (uncorrelated) SNPs are tested in a genome-wide cis eQTL analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites GTEx consortium63
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe expected number of true positives is derived from the power, and summing gene-wise power yields the expected number of significant DEGs/eQTLs.
“The expected number of true positives is directly derived from the power we reach for . Summing up the gene-wise power (at ) yields the expected number of significant DEGs/eQTLs .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFDR correction depends on the p value distribution of all genes, unlike Bonferroni correction which depends only on the number of tests.
“In contrast to the Bonferroni correction, which depends only on the number of tests, the FDR correction depends on the p value distribution of all genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationedgeR recommends that the expression cutoff should correspond to the percentage of samples in the smaller group.
“For the population level, we followed in most of our analyses the recommendation of edgeR75 that the expression cutoff should correspond to the percentage of samples in the smaller group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Chen, Y., Lun, A. T. L. & Smyth, G. K. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res. 5, 1438 (2016).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause the analytic method outputs power without computing p values, the FDR correction cannot be applied directly and the method of Jung is used.
“As our analytic method outputs the power without computing the p values, we can not apply the FDR correction directly and use the method of Jung.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationMore complex experimental designs can be addressed using the method of reference 95.
“More complex experimental designs can be addressed using the method of95.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Lyles, R. H., Lin, H.-M. & Williamson, J. M. A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses. Stat. Med. 26, 1632–1648 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe three main components of the statistical framework evaluated in the comparison were expression probability, power, and overall detection power.
“The three main components of our statistical framework were evaluated in the comparison, the expression probability (by comparing the number of expressed genes), the power (here according to the definition of powsimR, i.e., the power of all genes expressed in the simulated data) and the overall detection power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAn important limitation of simulation-based frameworks is that the number of expressed genes in the simulation tools can never be larger than the number of expressed genes in the training data set, while scPower can approximate expression of unseen genes with smaller mean values and estimate more expressed genes than seen in pilot data.
“An important limitation of the simulation based frameworks is here that the number of expressed genes in the simulation tools can never be larger than the number of expressed genes in the training data set, while scPower can also approximate expression of unseen genes with smaller mean values and so estimate more expressed genes than seen in the pilot data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo validate the model, the DE power estimations of the framework were compared with two simulation-based tools, powsimR and muscat40,43.
“To validate our model, we compared the DE power estimations of our framework with two simulation-based tools, called powsimR and muscat40,43.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites powsimR
Not checked in the free run.
- cites muscat40,43
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationeQTL effect and sample sizes were used from the Blueprint study on bulk RNA-seq of FACS sorted Monocytes and T cells57.
“We used eQTL effect and sample sizes from the Blueprint study on bulk RNA-seq of FACS sorted Monocytes and T cells57.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Chen, L. et al. Genetic drivers of epigenetic and transcriptional variation in human immune. Cells Cell 167, 1398–1414.e24 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe chose a cutoff of mean count < 5 and estimate power for genes with smaller mean values based on simulation instead of F-test to increase accuracy.
“We choose a cut-off of mean count < 5 and estimate the power for genes with smaller mean values based on simulation instead of the F-test to increase accuracy for small count values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor genes with high expression, eQTL power is calculated analytically using an F-test and depends on sample size, coefficient of determination, and significance threshold.
“For genes with high expression level, the power to detect an eQTL is calculated analytically using an F-test and depends on the sample size , the coefficient of determination of the locus and the chosen significance threshold .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Hillsdale, 1989).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSimulation-based methods perform random sampling of their count matrices, so simulation was repeated 25 times for each parameter combination to generate stable results.
“The simulation-based methods perform random sampling of their count matrices and therefore the simulation was repeated 25 times for each parameter combination to generate stable results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIn eQTL case, definition of groups depends on genotype and is not directly chosen by user.
“In the eQTL case, the definition of groups depends on the genotype and is therefore not directly chosen by the user.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe reported power of powsimR includes only genes expressed in the simulated data set (count > 0).
“The reported power of powsimR includes only genes, which are expressed in the simulated data set (count > 0).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites powsimR
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationFor DE analysis, the significance threshold can be adjusted for FDR using the method of Jung22.
“Alternatively, for DE analysis the significance threshold can be adjusted for the false discovery rate using the method of Jung22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jung22
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenpowsimR is not designed for multi-sample comparison and for both methods the option to apply a vector of log-fold changes with matching expression ranks was not available.
“powsimR is not designed for multi-sample comparison and for both methods the option to apply a vector of log-fold changes with matching expression ranks was not available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites powsimR
Not checked in the free run.
- cites muscat40,43
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe framework allows for any combination of power analysis and multiple testing method.
“However, our framework allows for any combination of power analysis and multiple testing method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOverall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
“The overall detection power for DEGs/eQTLs is the product of the expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both probabilities are conditionally independent given the expression mean of the gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Overall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationTo get realistic estimates for effect sizes (fold changes), data sets from FACS sorted bulk RNA-seq studies were taken53,54.
“To get realistic estimates for effect sizes (fold changes), data sets from FACS sorted bulk RNA-seq studies were taken53,54.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [53] Rendeiro, A. F. et al. Chromatin accessibility maps of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia identify subtype-specific epigenome signatures and transcription regulatory networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 11938 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Moreno-Moral, A. et al. Changes in macrophage transcriptome associate with systemic sclerosis and mediate GSDMA contribution to disease risk. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 77, 596–601 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor large count values, normalized log-transformed counts have constant variance independent of mean and can be analyzed with linear models.
“For large count values, it has been shown that normalized log transformed counts have a constant variance independent of the mean value and can be analyzed with linear models45.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAs no data was available to model the linear increase of the doublet rate during overloading correctly, the doublet rate was modeled as a constant factor and library preparation costs were estimated per cell.
“However, as there was no data available to model the linear increase of the doublet rate during overloading correctly, the doublet rate was modeled instead as a constant factor and the library preparation costs were estimated per cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDrop-seq is also a droplet-based technique, similar to 10X Genomics.
“The Drop-seq technology is also a droplet-based technique, similar to 10X Genomics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA second effect of doublets is that the read distribution is shifted, as doublets contain more reads than singlets.
“A second effect of doublets is that the read distribution is shifted, as doublets contain more reads than singlets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationmuscat fits one negative binomial distribution separately for each sample and subpopulation in the training data set.
“It fits one negative binomial distribution separately for each sample and subpopulation in the training data set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites muscat40,43
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationmuscat provides different scenarios for simulating differential expression besides the shift of mean expression (DE), including DP, DM, and DB.
“Another difference to powsimR is that muscat provides different scenarios for simulating differential expression besides the shift of the mean expression (called DE in muscat). Additionally, they simulate genes with different proportions of low and high expression-state (DP), differential modality (DM) or changes in both proportions and modality (DB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites muscat40,43
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSmart-seq2 is a plate-based technique, which produces full length transcripts and read counts instead of UMI counts.
“Smart-seq2 is a plate-based technique, which produces full length transcripts and read counts instead of UMI counts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationmuscat was specifically implemented for multi-sample comparisons, in contrast to powsimR.
“muscat: was specifically implemented for multi-sample comparisons, in contrast to powsimR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites muscat40,43
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBoth data sets were subsampled to investigate the effect of the read depth.
“Both data sets were subsampled to investigate the effect of the read depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataBudget restricted power was compared to PBMC 10X Genomics results, using the same simulated effect sizes and distribution ranks as well as matched observed priors from FACS sorted bulk studies.
“We compared the budget restricted power to our PBMC 10X Genomics results, using the same simulated effect sizes and distribution ranks as well as matched observed priors from FACS sorted bulk studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe simulation-based methods were applied to further validate scPower estimations for two real-life scenarios that can affect power: batch effects and differences of cell proportions between groups.
“We applied the simulation-based methods to further validate the scPower estimations in regards to two different real life scenarios that can affect the power: batch effects and differences of cell proportions between the groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenModel priors (effect sizes and gene rank distributions) were derived from FACS sorted bulk RNA-seq to get realistic assumptions.
“Model priors, i.e., effect sizes and gene rank distributions, were derived from FACS sorted bulk RNA-seq to get realistic assumptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationFollowing the approach of37, the doublet rate is modeled as linear dependent on the number of recovered cells, using values from the 10X User guide of V377.
“Following the approach of37, we model the doublet rate linear dependent on the number of recovered cells, using the values from the 10X User guide of V377.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Hafemeister, C. How Many Cells. https://satijalab.org/howmanycells (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites V377
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDifferent extreme prior distributions were simulated to evaluate their influence on the optimal experimental parameters.
“In addition, we simulated different extreme prior distributions to evaluate their influence on the optimal experimental parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenOverall experimental cost for a 10X Genomics experiment is the sum of library preparation cost and sequencing cost.
“The overall experimental cost for a 10X Genomics experiment is the sum of the library preparation cost and the sequencing cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDoublets also appear in Smart-seq2, but as a constant factor, not increasing with a higher number of cells per individual.
“Doublets also appear in Smart-seq2, but as a constant factor, not increasing with a higher number of cells per individual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationpowsimR uses training data to fit parameters of expression distributions for each cell type and gene.
“powsimR: uses training data to fit the parameters of the expression distributions for each cell type and gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites powsimR
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationTwo data sets of the human cell atlas were used: a Drop-seq data set measured in lung tissue52 and a Smart-seq2 data set measured in pancreas tissue51.
“Two data sets of the human cell atlas were used for that, a Drop-seq data set measured in lung tissue52 and a Smart-seq2 data set measured in pancreas tissue51.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] Vieira Braga, F. A. et al. A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. Nat. Med. 25, 1153–1163 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Enge, M. et al. Single-cell analysis of human pancreas reveals transcriptional signatures of aging and somatic mutation patterns. Cell 171, 321–330.e14 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLog fold changes for the DE studies were modeled as normally distributed.
“The log fold changes for the DE studies were modeled as normally distributed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
An unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases is assumed for batch effect correction.
“under the assumptions of an unconfounded experimental design with batches containing both controls and cases, batch effects can be removed by adding a batch covariate to the regression model71.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The counts of each gene in each cell type follow a negative binomial distribution.
“We assume a negative binomial distribution () for the counts of each gene in each cell type with and .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor.
“The sum of gene counts follows a negative binomial distribution where the parameters are altered by the number of cells per cell type and donor to and .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The distribution of mean values over all genes in a cell type is a mixture of a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions.
“To generalize the expression probability model also for unseen data sets, the distribution of the mean values over all genes in a cell type is modelled as a mixture distribution with three components, a zero component and two left-censored gamma distributions 7”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The relationship between mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters is linear.
“The relationship between the mean UMI counts per cell and the gamma parameters (mean and standard deviation of the two gamma distributions) is linear and values are estimated by linear regression, fitted over the gamma distribution for each run and all subsampled runs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with increasing read depth leading to saturation of UMIs.
“The number of transcriptome mapped reads is linearly related to the logarithm of the mean UMI counts per cell, with an increasing read depth leading to a saturation of UMIs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The residuals in the eQTL power calculation are i.i.d. normally distributed.
“This power calculation assumes that the residuals are i.i.d. normally distributed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Genotypes are generated according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
“A random genotype vector with of length is generated with the expected number of each genotype according to Hardy Weinberg equilibrium.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Gene expression counts are sampled from a negative binomial distribution parameterized for each genotype.
“The associated gene expression count vector is sampled from a negative binomial distribution parameterized for each genotype with mean and dispersion .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Overall detection power is the product of expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both are conditionally independent given expression mean.
“The overall detection power for DEGs/eQTLs is the product of the expression probability and power to detect DEGs/eQTLs, as both probabilities are conditionally independent given the expression mean of the gene.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Nearly all doublets are detectable using Demuxlet and Scrublet and discarded during preprocessing of the data set.
“We assume that nearly all doublets are detectable using Demuxlet and Scrublet and discarded during the preprocessing of the data set.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Doublets contain 80% more reads than singlets.
“Again following the approach of37, we assume that doublets contain 80% more reads than singlets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No simulation-based power analysis for eQTLs exists (and also no other method).
“As no simulation-based power analysis for eQTLs exists (and also no other method), we benchmarked the eQTL power with our own simulation tool (described in the methods section Power analysis for expression quantitative trait loci).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The power to detect differentially expressed genes with AD or β-amyloid depends strongly on numbers of independent samples.
“Finally, the power to detect differentially expressed genes with AD or β-amyloid depends strongly on numbers of independent samples [62].”
From Characterisation of premature cell senescence in Alzheimer's disease using single nuclear transcriptomics (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
The Results section says differential-expression detection power increases with sample size, but also says the sample-size effect was not pronounced in one example and that the number of cells per individual was the major determinant of power in most DEG scenarios. The paper's examples concern CLL and systemic sclerosis, not AD or β-amyloid, so it does not establish that sample numbers strongly determine power in those specific comparisons. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458 · see citing works
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424 · see citing works
Differential expression analysis for sequence count data
Anders, S., & Huber, W. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · Cited by 15,581 · see citing works
SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P., & Theis, F. J. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 · Cited by 8,881 · see citing works
Self-citationMassively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353 · see citing works
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · see citing works
voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 · Cited by 6,155 · see citing works
The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues
The GTEx Consortium, Aguet, F., Anand, S., Ardlie, K. G., Gabriel, S., Getz, G. A., Graubert, A., Hadley, K., Handsaker, R. E., Huang, K. H., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz1776 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006 · see citing works
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
GTEx Consortium (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24277 · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell
Tang, F., Barbacioru, C., Wang, Y., Nordman, E., Lee, C., Xu, N., Wang, X., Bodeau, J., Tuch, B. B., Siddiqui, A., et al. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1315 · Cited by 3,969 · see citing works
Finak, G., McDavid, A., Yajima, M., Deng, J., Gersuk, V., Shalek, A. K., Slichter, C. K., Miller, H. W., McElrath, M. J., Prlic, M., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5 · Cited by 3,159 · see citing works
Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data
Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R., & Klein, A. M. (2018) · doi:10.1101/357368 · Cited by 2,758 · see citing works
Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data
Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R., & Klein, A. M. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005 · Cited by 2,758 · see citing works
Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · Cited by 2,530 · see citing works
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., Campbell, P., Carninci, P., Clatworthy, M., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27041 · Cited by 2,232 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial
Luecken, M. D., & Theis, F. J. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188746 · Cited by 2,231 · see citing works
Self-citationRNA sequencing: the teenage years
Stark, R., Grzelak, M., & Hadfield, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0150-2 · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans
The Geuvadis Consortium, Lappalainen, T., Sammeth, M., Friedländer, M. R., ‘t Hoen, P. A. C., Monlong, J., Rivas, M. A., Gonzàlez-Porta, M., Kurbatova, N., Griebel, T., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12531 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Recovering Gene Interactions from Single-Cell Data Using Data Diffusion
van Dijk, D., Sharma, R., Nainys, J., Yim, K., Kathail, P., Carr, A. J., Burdziak, C., Moon, K. R., Chaffer, C. L., Pattabiraman, D., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types
Jaitin, D. A., Kenigsberg, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Elefant, N., Paul, F., Zaretsky, I., Mildner, A., Cohen, N., Jung, S., Tanay, A., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247651 · Cited by 1,795 · see citing works
Wolf, F. A., Hamey, F. K., Plass, M., Solana, J., Dahlin, J. S., Göttgens, B., Rajewsky, N., Simon, L., & Theis, F. J. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1663-x · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods
Ziegenhain, C., Vieth, B., Parekh, S., Reinius, B., Guillaumet-Adkins, A., Smets, M., Leonhardt, H., Heyn, H., Hellmann, I., & Enard, W. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.023 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C. O., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., & al, E. (2017) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-162597 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis
Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L., & Scadden, D. T. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2967 · Cited by 1,348 · see citing works
Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation
Kang, H. M., Subramaniam, M., Targ, S., Nguyen, M., Maliskova, L., McCarthy, E., Wan, E., Wong, S., Byrnes, L., Lanata, C. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4042 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
Lähnemann, D., Köster, J., Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S. C., Robinson, M. D., Vallejos, C. A., Campbell, K. R., Beerenwinkel, N., Mahfouz, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 · Cited by 1,327 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Y., Lun, A. T. L., & Smyth, G. K. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8987.2 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics
Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A., & Marioni, J. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3833 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA-seq denoising using a deep count autoencoder
Eraslan, G., Simon, L. M., Mircea, M., Mueller, N. S., & Theis, F. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07931-2 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Self-citationStegle, O., Parts, L., Piipari, M., Winn, J., & Durbin, R. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.457 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Lun, A. T. L., Riesenfeld, S. J., Andrews, T. S., Dao, T. P., Gomes, T., Jamboree, P. I. T. 1. H. C. A., & Marioni, J. C. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1662-y · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression
Squair, J. W., Gautier, M., Kathe, C., Anderson, M. A., James, N. D., Hutson, T. H., Hudelle, R., Qaiser, T., Matson, K. J. E., Barraud, Q., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.12.435024 · Cited by 1,017 · see citing works
SEQC/MAQC-III Consortium (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2957 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Monaco, G., Lee, B., Xu, W., Mustafah, S., Hwang, Y. Y., Carré, C., Burdin, N., Visan, L., Ceccarelli, M., Poidinger, M., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.041 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing MethodsPreprint
Ziegenhain, C., Vieth, B., Parekh, S., et al. (2016) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/035758 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade
Svensson, V., Vento‐Tormo, R., & Teichmann, S. A. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2017.149 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data
Zappia, L., Phipson, B., & Oshlack, A. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1305-0 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cellsPreprint
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., et al. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/065912 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma
Vieira Braga, F. A., Kar, G., Berg, M., Carpaij, O. A., Polanski, K., Simon, L. M., Brouwer, S., Gomes, T., Hesse, L., Jiang, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0468-5 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping complex disease traits with global gene expression
Cookson, W., Liang, L., Abecasis, G., Moffatt, M., & Lathrop, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2537 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis
Soneson, C., & Robinson, M. D. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4612 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments
Bourgon, R., Gentleman, R. C., & Huber, W. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914005107 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Multiple Comparisons Among Means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2282330 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods
Wu, A. R., Neff, N. F., Kalisky, T., Dalerba, P., Treutlein, B., Rothenberg, M. E., Mburu, F. M., Mantalas, G. L., Sim, S., Clarke, M. F., et al. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2694 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Genetic Drivers of Epigenetic and Transcriptional Variation in Human Immune Cells
Chen, L., Ge, B., Casale, F. P., Vasquez, L., Kwan, T., Garrido-Martín, D., Watt, S., Yan, Y., Kundu, K., Ecker, S., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.026 · Cited by 679 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The effect sizes for the eQTL and DE power were taken from published studies, accessible in the supplement of Chen et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.026), Rendeiro et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11938), Moreno-Moral et al. 2018…”
MethodInfluentialDNA microarrays in drug discovery and development
Debouck, C. M., & Goodfellow, P. N. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/4475 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics
Wagner, A., Regev, A., & Yosef, N. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3711 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits
Civelek, M., & Lusis, A. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3575 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
Svensson, V., Natarajan, K. N., Ly, L.-H., Miragaia, R. J., Labalette, C., Macaulay, I. C., Cvejic, A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4220 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Enge, M., Arda, H. E., Mignardi, M., Beausang, J., Bottino, R., Kim, S. K., & Quake, S. R. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.004 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Cell type–specific genetic regulation of gene expression across human tissues
Kim-Hellmuth, S., Aguet, F., Oliva, M., Muñoz-Aguirre, M., Kasela, S., Wucher, V., Castel, S. E., Hamel, A. R., Viñuela, A., Roberts, A. L., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz8528 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Crowell, H. L., Soneson, C., Germain, P.-L., Calini, D., Collin, L., Raposo, C., Malhotra, D., & Robinson, M. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19894-4 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Kahan, B. C., Jairath, V., Doré, C. J., & Morris, T. P. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-139 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Gene expression profiling of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with cDNA microarrays.
Khan, J. I., Simon, R., Bittner, M. L., Chen, Y., Leighton, S. B., Pohida, T. J., Smith, P. D., Jiang, Y. Y., Gooden, G. C., Trent, J. M., et al. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 437 · see citing works
MetaCell: analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data using K-nn graph partitions
Baran, Y., Bercovich, A., Sebé-Pedrós, A., Lubling, Y., Giladi, A., Chomsky, E., Meir, Z., Hoichman, M., Lifshitz, A., & Tanay, A. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1812-2 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies celltype-specific cis-eQTLs and co-expression QTLs
Study, L. C., van der Wijst, M. G. P., BIOS Consortium, Brugge, H., de Vries, D. H., Deelen, P., Swertz, M. A., & Franke, L. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0089-9 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissuesPreprint
Aguet, F., Barbeira, A., Bonazzola, R., Brown, A. A., Castel, S. E., Jo, B., Kasela, S., Kim-Hellmuth, S., Liang, Y., Oliva, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/787903 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated
Svensson, V. (2019) · doi:10.1101/582064 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Calculating Sample Size Estimates for RNA Sequencing Data
Hart, S. N., Therneau, T. M., Zhang, Y., Poland, G. A., & Kocher, J.-P. (2013) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0283 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Cuomo, A. S. E., Seaton, D. D., McCarthy, D. J., Martinez, I., Bonder, M. J., Garcia-Bernardo, J., Amatya, S., Madrigal, P., Isaacson, A., Buettner, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14457-z · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Computational methods for theidentification of differential and coordinated gene expression
Claverie, J. (1999) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/8.10.1821 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Wang, T., Li, B., Nelson, C. E., & Nabavi, S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2599-6 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
A statistical approach for identifying differential distributions in single-cell RNA-seq experiments
Korthauer, K. D., Chu, L.-F., Newton, M. A., Li, Y., Thomson, J., Stewart, R., & Kendziorski, C. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1077-y · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project
Lonsdale, J., Thomas, J., Salvatore, M., Phillips, R., Lo, E., Shad, S., Hasz, R., Walters, G., Garcia, F., Young, N., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2653 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Power analysis and sample size estimation for RNA-Seq differential expression
Ching, T., Huang, S., & Garmire, L. X. (2014) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.046011.114 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Hernández, A. V., Steyerberg, E. W., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Age-Dependent Pancreatic Gene Regulation Reveals Mechanisms Governing Human β Cell Function
Arda, H. E., Li, L., Tsai, J., Torre, E. A., Rosli, Y., Peiris, H., Spitale, R. C., Dai, C., Gu, X., Qu, K., et al. (2016) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.002 · Cited by 222 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…accessible in the supplement of Chen et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.026), Rendeiro et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11938), Moreno-Moral et al. 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212454) and Arda et al, 2016 (https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.002).”
InfluentialTutorial: guidelines for the experimental design of single-cell RNA sequencing studies
Lafzi, A., Moutinho, C., Picelli, S., & Heyn, H. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0073-y · Cited by 218 · see citing works
The single-cell eQTLGen consortium
van der Wijst, M. G. P., de Vries, D., Groot, H. E., Trynka, G., Hon, C.-C., Bonder, M. J., Stegle, O., Nawijn, M. C., Idaghdour, Y., van der Harst, P., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52155 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle cells make big data: New challenges and opportunities in transcriptomics
Angerer, P., Simon, L. M., Tritschler, S., Wolf, F., Fischer, D. S., & Theis, F. J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.004 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationData denoising with transfer learning in single-cell transcriptomics
Wang, J., Agarwal, D., Huang, M. C., Hu, G., Zhou, Z., Ye, C., & Zhang, N. R. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0537-1 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
DNA methylation in lung cells is associated with asthma endotypes and genetic risk
Nicodemus-Johnson, J., Myers, R. A., Sakabe, N. J., Sobreira, D. R., Hogarth, D. K., Naureckas, E. T., Sperling, A. I., Solway, J., White, S. R., Nobrega, M. A., et al. (2016) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.90151 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the last decadePreprint
Svensson, V., Tormo, R. V., & Teichmann, S. A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01379 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Heimberg, G., Bhatnagar, R., El-Samad, H., & Thomson, M. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.001 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
powsimR: power analysis for bulk and single cell RNA-seq experiments
Vieth, B., Ziegenhain, C., Parekh, S., Enard, W., & Hellmann, I. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx435 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Liu, P., & Hwang, J. T. G. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl664 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Rendeiro, A. F., Schmidl, C., Strefford, J. C., Walewska, R., Davis, Z., Farlik, M., Oscier, D., & Bock, C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11938 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…eQTL and DE power were taken from published studies, accessible in the supplement of Chen et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.026), Rendeiro et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11938), Moreno-Moral et al. 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212454) and Arda et…”
MethodInfluentialScotty: a web tool for designing RNA-Seq experiments to measure differential gene expression
Busby, M. A., Stewart, C., Miller, C. A., Grzeda, K. R., & Marth, G. T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt015 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Bi, R., & Liu, P. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0994-9 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
PROPER: comprehensive power evaluation for differential expression using RNA-seq
Wu, H., Wang, C., & Wu, Z. J. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu640 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis
Jung, S. (2005) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti456 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
UMI-count modeling and differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing
Chen, W., Li, Y., Easton, J., Finkelstein, D., Wu, G., & Chen, X. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1438-9 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Sample size calculation for comparing two negative binomial rates
Zhu, H., & Lakkis, H. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5947 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Comparison of methods to detect differentially expressed genes between single-cell populations
Jaakkola, M. K., Seyednasrollah, F., Mehmood, A., & Elo, L. L. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw057 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
McEnhancer: predicting gene expression via semi-supervised assignment of enhancers to target genes
Hafez, D., Calviello, A. K., Krueger, S., Hwang, Y.-C., Wang, L., Zinzen, R. P., & Ohler, U. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1316-x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Moreno-Moral, A., Bagnati, M., Koturan, S., Ko, J.-H., Fonseca, C., Harmston, N., Game, L., Martin, J., Ong, V., Abraham, D. J., et al. (2018) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212454 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…accessible in the supplement of Chen et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.026), Rendeiro et al. 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11938), Moreno-Moral et al. 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212454) and Arda et al, 2016 (https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.002).”
InfluentialA statistical simulator scDesign for rational scRNA-seq experimental design
Li, W. V., & Li, J. J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz321 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Discovery and characterization of variance QTLs in human induced pluripotent stem cells
Sarkar, A. K., Tung, P.-Y., Blischak, J. D., Burnett, J. E., Li, Y. I., Stephens, M., & Gilad, Y. (2019) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008045 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Sample size determination for the false discovery rate
Pounds, S. B., & Cheng, C. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti699 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Design and analysis of comparative microarray experiments
Speed, T. P. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780203011232-9 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data.
Edwards, D. (2004) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.172_2.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Optimized design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysis
Mandric, I., Schwarz, T., Majumdar, A., Hou, K., Briscoe, L., Perez, R., Subramaniam, M., Hafemeister, C., Satija, R., Ye, C. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19365-w · Cited by 62 · see citing works
MetaCell: analysis of single cell RNA-seq data using k-NN graph partitionsPreprint
Baran, Y., Sebé-Pedrós, A., Lubling, Y., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/437665 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Brückl, T. M., Spoormaker, V. I., Sämann, P. G., Brem, A., Henco, L., Czamara, D., Elbau, I., Grandi, N. C., Jollans, L., Kühnel, A., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02541-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationLyles, R. H., Lin, H., & Williamson, J. M. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2617 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
SCOPIT: sample size calculations for single-cell sequencing experiments
Davis, A., Gao, R., & Navin, N. E. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3167-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The birth of a human-specific neural gene by incomplete duplication and gene fusion
Dougherty, M. L., Nuttle, X., Penn, O., Nelson, B. J., Huddleston, J., Baker, C. A., Harshman, L., Duyzend, M., Ventura, M., Antonacci, F., et al. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1163-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Chen, W., Zhang, S., Williams, J., Ju, B., Shaner, B., Easton, J., Wu, G., & Chen, X. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.026 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Heinrich, V., Stange, J., Dickhaus, T., Imkeller, P., Krüger, U., Bauer, S., Mundlos, S., Robinson, P. N., Hecht, J., & Krawitz, P. M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1073 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Crowell, H. L., Soneson, C., Germain, P.-L., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/713412 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Simulation, power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA-seq
Su, K., Wu, Z. J., & Wu, H. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa607 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Feasibility of sample size calculation for RNA-seq studies
Poplawski, A., & Binder, H. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw144 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jc, P. (1972) · PubMed · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Effect of decreased O2 affinity of hemoglobin on work performance during exercise in healthy humans.
Farber, M. O., Sullivan, T. Y., Fineberg, N. S., Carlone, S., & Manfredi, F. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 22 · see citing works
General power and sample size calculations for high-dimensional genomic data
van Iterson, M., van de Wiel, M. A., Boer, J. M., & de Menezes, R. X. (2013) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1515/sagmb-2012-0046 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Abrams, D., Kumar, P., Karuturi, R. K. M., & George, J. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2817-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Cuomo, A. S. E., Seaton, D. D., McCarthy, D. J., Martinez, I., Bonder, M. J., Garcia‐Bernardo, J., Amatya, S., Madrigal, P., Isaacson, A., Buettner, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15098-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Li, C.-I., & Shyr, Y. (2016) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1515/sagmb-2016-0008 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Optimal design of single-cell RNA sequencing experiments for cell-type-specific eQTL analysisPreprint
Mandric, I., Schwarz, T., Majumdar, A., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/766972 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
heiniglab/scPower: First release
Matthiasheinig, & KatharinaSchmid (2021) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5552752 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spatial components of molecular tissue biology
Palla, G., Fischer, D. S., Regev, A., & Theis, F. J. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01182-1 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
“This problem has been investigated in the context of dissociation-based assays 177,178 but is yet unexplored for spatial molecular data. conclusions Spatial profiling carries the promise of connecting variation in high-dimensional single-cell omics datasets with interpretable biological phenomena…”
Self-citationDestVI identifies continuums of cell types in spatial transcriptomics data
Lopez, R., Li, B., Keren-Shaul, H., Boyeau, P., Kedmi, M., Pilzer, D., Jelinski, A., Yofe, I., David, E., Wagner, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01272-8 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
“In general, we suggest that users of DestVI prepare their single-cell RNA sequencing data according to power analysis tools [69].”
MethodSingle-cell transcriptomics for the assessment of cardiac disease
Miranda, A. M. A., Janbandhu, V., Maatz, H., Kanemaru, K., Cranley, J., Teichmann, S. A., Hübner, N., Schneider, M. D., Harvey, R. P., & Noseda, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00805-7 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Oelen, R., de Vries, D. H., Brugge, H., Gordon, M. G., Vochteloo, M., Ye, C., Westra, H.-J., Franke, L., & van der Wijst, M. G. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30893-5 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“However, since the statistical power to detect such DE effects is correlated with the number of cells within a subcell type 32 , likely some of the subcell type speci fi city remains undetectable.”
BackgroundOptimizing expression quantitative trait locus mapping workflows for single-cell studies
Cuomo, A. S. E., Alvari, G., Azodi, C. B. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Bonder, M. J. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02407-x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
snRNA-seq stratifies multiple sclerosis patients into distinct white matter glial responses
Macnair, W., Calini, D., Agirre, E., Bryois, J., Jäkel, S., Smith, R. S., Kukanja, P., Stokar-Regenscheit, N., Ott, V., Foo, L. C., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.016 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
eQTL studies: from bulk tissues to single cells
Zhang, J., & Zhao, H. (2023) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2023.05.003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Tosoni, G., Ayyildiz, D., Bryois, J., Macnair, W., Fitzsimons, C. P., Lucassen, P. J., & Salta, E. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.03.010 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A guide to systems-level immunomics
Bonaguro, L., Schulte-Schrepping, J., Ulas, T., Aschenbrenner, A. C., Beyer, M., & Schultze, J. L. (2022) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-022-01309-9 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“Approaches to power calculation, such as the scPower or powsimR frameworks 79,80 , should be taken into account during study design.”
MethodLi, H., Sun, Y., Hong, H., Huang, X., Tao, H., Huang, Q., Wang, L., Xu, K., Gan, J., Chen, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00469-5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“This is very in consistent with past studies 46–48 , whereas such consistency was not demonstrated by GENIE3.”
ResultIntegrated single-cell atlas of human atherosclerotic plaques
Traeuble, K., Munz, M., Pauli, J., Sachs, N., Vafadarnejad, E., Carrillo‐Roa, T., Mäegdefessel, L., Kastner, P., & Heinig, M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63202-x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“…model was demonstrated and validated in several downstream tasks, such as automated cell type annotation, planning of future experiments with scPower 14 , and combining the vast information of single-cell data with the big sample sizes of bulkRNA-seq datasets by deconvolution with BayesPrism 17 .”
Self-citationConsiderations for building and using integrated single-cell atlases
Hrovatin, K., Sikkema, L., Shitov, V. A., Heimberg, G., Shulman, M., Oliver, A. J., Mueller, M. F., Ibarra, I. L., Wang, H., Ramírez-Suástegui, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02532-y · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“This can be useful when studying rare cell types or when determining the optimal combination of counts per cell and number of profiled cells for differential gene expression analysis 133,144 .”
Self-citationOliva, A. D., Gupta, R., Issa, K., Hachem, R. A., Jang, D. W., Wellford, S. A., Moseman, E. A., Matsunami, H., & Goldstein, B. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci155506 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
In silico tissue generation and power analysis for spatial omics
Baker, E. A. G., Schapiro, D., Dumitrascu, B., Vicković, S., & Regev, A. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01766-6 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Valkiers, S., de Vrij, N., Gielis, S., Verbandt, S., Ogunjimi, B., Laukens, K., & Meysman, P. (2022) · ImmunoInformatics · doi:10.1016/j.immuno.2022.100009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
MarsGT: Multi-omics analysis for rare population inference using single-cell graph transformer
Wang, X., Duan, M., Li, J., Ma, A., Xin, G., Xu, D. H., Li, Z., Liu, B., & Ma, Q. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44570-8 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Methods and Insights from Single-Cell Expression Quantitative Trait Loci
Kang, J. B., Raveane, A., Nathan, A., Soranzo, N., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2023) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-101422-100437 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Recently, such simulation frameworks have been able to incorporate genetic effects, making them amenable to sc-eQTL power analysis (9, 94, 128).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMaden, S. K., Kwon, S. H., Huuki-Myers, L. A., Collado‐Torres, L., Hicks, S. C., & Maynard, K. R. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-03123-4 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“As sc/snRNA-seq data is characteristically sparse, pooling cells across groups can further boost power to characterize rare, small, or less active cell types [46, 48].”
BackgroundConsequences and opportunities arising due to sparser single-cell RNA-seq datasets
Bouland, G. A., Mahfouz, A. E., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02933-w · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“population scale and multi-condition scRNA-seq datasets are emerging [17, 18], for which a low coverage sequencing is sufficient to capture cell type specific gene expression (given enough cells are measured per individual and per cell type) [19].”
BackgroundFancy, N. N., Smith, A. M., Caramello, A., Tsartsalis, S., Davey, K., Muirhead, R. C. J., McGarry, A., Jenkyns, M. H., Schneegans, E., Chau, V., et al. (2024) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-024-02727-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Roehrig, A., Hirsch, T. Z., Pire, A., Morcrette, G., Gupta, B., Marcaillou, C., Imbeaud, S., Chardot, C., Gonzales, E. M., Jacquemin, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47280-x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“0.4) 48 , we estimated that, with the number of samples, cells per sample and reads per cell of our study, we have 95% power to identify a population representing 2.7% of all cells.”
MethodInfluentialChen, W., Yu, H., Hao, Y., Liu, W., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Feng, L., Guan, Y., Huang, L., et al. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c03765 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Challenges and Opportunities in the Clinical Translation of High-Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics
Pentimalli, T. M., Karaiskos, N., & Rajewsky, N. (2024) · Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-111523-023417 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Similarly to clinical single-cell studies,a sample’s cellular composition, sensitivity, accuracy, and depth of gene expression profiling are critical to identify statistical differences in cell types (158).”
Sang-aram, C., Browaeys, R., Seurinck, R., & Saeys, Y. (2025) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01121-9 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Bonev, B., Castelo‐Branco, G., Chen, F., Codeluppi, S., Corces, M. R., Fan, J., Heiman, M., Harris, K., Inoue, F., Kellis, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01806-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationCaporale, N., Castaldi, D., Rigoli, M. T., Cheroni, C., Valenti, A., Stucchi, S., Lessi, M., Bulgheresi, D., Trattaro, S., Pezzali, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02555-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“One of the most powerful innovations enabled by single-cell analysis of experimental models featuring extensive cellular heterogeneity, such as CBOs, is the possibility to analyze developmental trajectories through pseudotime analysis 49,50 .”
Self-citationJeon, H., Xie, J., Jeon, Y., Jung, K. J., Gupta, A., Chang, W., & Chung, D. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13020221 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Four software tools are available for this type of power analysis: ‘powsimR’ [42], ‘hierarchicell’ [41], ‘POWSC’ [43], and ‘scPower’ [40].”
Perspectives on rigor and reproducibility in single cell genomics
Gibson, G. C. (2022) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010210 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Advances in statistical methodology will come quickly, aiding in optimization of experimental design through tools like scPower [36] and Heirarchicell [37].”
MethodHagenberg, J., BeCOME study group, OPTIMA Study Group, Brückl, T. M., Erhart, M., Kopf‐Beck, J., Ködel, M., Rehawi, G., Roeh, S., Sauer, S., et al. (2024) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.09.013 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Single cell PBMC RNA-seq data from 14 individuals with depression and other mental disorders with accession number GSE185714 was processed with scanpy version 1.9.3 (Wolf et al., 2018) according to Schmid et al. (2021) and their cell type labels used.”
InfluentialSelf-citationAuerbach, B. J., Hu, J., Reilly, M. P., & Li, M. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.275430.121 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Practical Considerations for Single‐Cell Genomics
Regan, C., & Preall, J. B. (2022) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.498 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Employing a power calculation or study simulation tool such as powsimR (Vieth, Ziegenhain, Parekh, Enard, & Hellmann, 2017), scPower (Schmid et al., 2021), scDesign2 (Sun, Song, Li, & Li, 2021), and POWSC (Su, Wu, & Wu, 2020) can be a useful way to predict the feasibility of the stated goals,…”
MethodComputing Power and Sample Size for the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Applications
Ni, Y., Seffernick, A. E., Onar‐Thomas, A., & Pounds, S. B. (2024) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes15030344 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“The scPower framework computes power for multi-sample single-cell transcriptomic experiments [19].”
MethodThe Power of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in eQTL Discovery
Maria, M., Pouyanfar, N., Örd, T., & Kaikkonen, M. U. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13030502 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“The best way would be to run power calculations using R or R-based packages [14,35,36].”
MethodMethods for Stratification and Validation Cohorts: A Scoping Review
Torres, T., Niubo, A. S., Monistrol-Mula, A., Gerardi, C., Banzi, R., Garcia, P., Demotes‐Mainard, J., Haro, J. M., & the PERMIT Group (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12050688 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
New horizons in the stormy sea of multimodal single-cell data integration
Jackson, C. A., & Vogel, C. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.012 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Patir, A., Barrington, J., Szymkowiak, S., Brezzo, G., Straus, D., Alfieri, A., Lefèvre, L., Liu, Z., Ginhoux, F., Henderson, N. C., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114250 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Large-scale single-nuclei profiling identifies role for ATRNL1 in atrial fibrillation
Hill, M. C., Simonson, B., Roselli, C., Xiao, L., Herndon, C. N., Chaffin, M. D., Mantineo, H., Atwa, O., Bhasin, H., Guedira, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54296-w · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dissecting B/Plasma Cells in Periodontitis at Single-Cell/Bulk Resolution
Liu, L., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Yang, F., Li, X., Luo, S., Yang, L., Wang, T., Song, D., & Huang, D. (2022) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345221099442 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The heightened technical sensitivity in precise tissue sampling and the need for single-cell suspension preparation within a limited period often led to biased small sample single-cell evidence (Schmid et al. 2021), which may mask the proportional and significant B-cell change in the immune response.”
BackgroundGuo, X., Ning, J., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Zhao, L., Fan, Y., & Sun, S. (2023) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elad011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Considerations for reproducible omics in aging research
Singh, P. P., & Benayoun, B. A. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00448-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Tayran, H., Yılmaz, E., Bhattarai, P., Min, Y., Wang, X., Ma, Y., Wang, N., Jeong, I., Nelson, N. N., Kassara, N., et al. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100642 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…and individually (Figures 2G and S2C) were sufficient in terms of the sample size (SCOPIT 55 and detection power for differential expression, scPower 56 , as per analyses with the following parameters: cell-type frequency, 0.3; multiple testing method, false discovery rate [FDR]; p value, 0.05;…”
MethodInfluentialFalconnier, C., Caparros-Roissard, A., Decraene, C., & Lutz, P.-É. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02238-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Farbehi, N., Neavin, D. R., Cuomo, A. S. E., Studer, L., MacArthur, D. G., & Powell, J. E. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01731-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Insights, opportunities, and challenges provided by large cell atlases
Hemberg, M., Marini, F., Ghazanfar, S., Al-Ajami, A., Abassi, N., Anchang, B., Benayoun, B. A., Cao, Y., Chen, K., Cuesta-Astroz, Y., et al. (2025) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03771-8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“However, such summaries may impair our ability to tease out subtle and biologically relevant signals that only come with the massive statistical power offered by large sample sizes [34].”
Generative Models: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Sankaran, K., & Holmes, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-033121-110134 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…properties common across single-cell datasets: overdispersed counts, a high degree of sparsity, low effective dimensionality, and the presence of batch effects (Zappia et al., 2017, Risso et al., 2017, Zhang et al., 2019a, Yu et al., 2020, Sun et al., 2021, Schmid et al., 2021, Qin et al., 2022).”
BackgroundZuniga, A., Han, J., Miller-Crews, I., Agee, L., Hofmann, H. A., & Drew, M. R. (2024) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-024-01897-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Following the guidance of Davis et al. [15] and Schmid et al. [16], we estimated that we needed to sequence 7,385 cells/pool from ~3 samples to detect two cell populations with as few as ~20 cells/pool with 99% power.”
How thoughtful experimental design can empower biologists in the omics era
Wagner, M. R., & Kleiner, M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62616-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tumour infiltrating B cells discriminate checkpoint blockade-induced responses
Valpione, S., Campana, L. G., Weightman, J., Salih, Z., Galvani, E., Mundra, P. A., Rosa, F. D., Gupta, A., Serra-Bellver, P., Lorigan, P. C., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.022 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bhattarai, P., Yılmaz, E., Cakir, E. Ö., Yüceer, H., Lee, A., Ma, Y., Çelikkaya, H., Coşacak, M. İ., Haage, V. C., Wang, X., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.24.634732 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Gillespie, E. R., Grice, L. F., Courtney, I. G., Lao, H. W., Jung, W., Ramkomuth, S., Xie, J., Brown, D. A., Walsham, J., Radford, K. J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-024-03048-0 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Our scRNAseq dataset was otherwise sufficiently large to detect rare cell (sub) types (as few as 5 cells) with over 99% sensitivity and a false discovery rate of less than 5% [34].”
Subcellular RNA-seq for the Analysis of the Dendritic and Somatic Transcriptomes of Single Neurons
Perez, J. D., & Schuman, E. M. (2022) · BIO-PROTOCOL · doi:10.21769/bioprotoc.4278 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Optimizing the design of spatial genomic studies
Jones, A., Cai, D., Li, D., & Engelhardt, B. E. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49174-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Karuna, N., Kerrigan, L., Edgar, K. S., Cappa, O., Simpson, D. A. C., Tonry, C. L., Grieve, D. J., & Watson, C. J. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01913-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“We performed a power analysis for snRNA-seq experiment using the scPower website (https:// scpow er. helmh oltz-muenc hen. de ) [30], setting the number of samples to 3, the cell type frequency to 0.25, the detection power at least 0.80, resulted in a requirement of at least 5500 cells/nuclei per…”
InfluentialSingle-cell and spatial profiling in cancer biology and clinical oncology
Frangieh, C. J., Fan, J. L., Melms, J. C., Shah, P., Azizi, E., & Izar, B. (2026) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01142-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Proximal tubule responses to injury: interrogation by single-cell transcriptomics
Cippà, P. E., & McMahon, A. P. (2023) · Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · doi:10.1097/mnh.0000000000000893 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Appropriate power calculations will become standard as in other areas of biomedical research [26].”
BackgroundOliva, A. D., Issa, K., Hachem, R. A., Jang, D. W., Gupta, R., Moseman, E. A., Matsunami, H., & Goldstein, B. J. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.09.455538 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Shui, L., Maitra, A., Yuan, Y., Lau, K. S., Kaur, H., Li, L., & Li, Z. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013293 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Resolving Human Lactation Heterogeneity Using Single Milk-Derived Cells, a Resource at the Ready
Carli, J. F. M., Trahan, G. D., & Rudolph, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia · doi:10.1007/s10911-021-09489-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Transcriptomic plasticity of cholinergic adipose macrophages in the acute thermogenic response
Knights, A. J., Kim, E. J., Liu, S., & Wu, J. (2025) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110925 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“This approach was chosen to maximize biological representation and variation while retaining statistical power from high cell numbers (61).”
eQTL analysis: A bridge from genome to mechanism
Jia, Z., Xu, J., Ma, Y., Wei, S., Sun, C., Chen, X., Kang, J., Chen, H., Zhang, C., Dong, Y., et al. (2025) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101850 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“74 Additionally, various resources are accessible, such as the single-cell eQTLGen consortium 75 and the OneK1K cohort.”
Liver single-nucleus multiome profiling reveals cell-type mechanisms for cardiometabolic traits
Alkhawaja, A. A., Currin, K. W., Perrin, H. J., Vadlamudi, S., Etheridge, A. S., Broadaway, K. A., Cannon, G. H., Anderson, C. W., Moxley, A. H., Iuga, A. C., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.11.009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Maximizing statistical power to detect clinically associated cell states with scPOSTPreprint
Millard, N., Korsunsky, I., Weinand, K., Fonseka, C. Y., Nathan, A., Kang, J. B., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.23.390682 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ghatan, S., Panten, J., Oliveros, W., Sanjana, N. E., Morris, J. A., & Lappalainen, T. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.05.651929 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Maximizing statistical power to detect differentially abundant cell states with scPOST
Millard, N., Korsunsky, I., Weinand, K., Fonseka, C. Y., Nathan, A., Kang, J. B., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2021) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100120 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fu, W., Xie, Q., Yu, P., Liu, S., Xu, L., Ye, X., Zhao, W., Wang, Q., Pan, Y., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1530214 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Li, S., Schmid, K., de Vries, D. H., Korshevniuk, M., Oelen, R., van Blokland, I. V., Groot, H. E., Swertz, M. A., van der Harst, P., Westra, H.-J., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.04.20.488925 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationA practical guide to sequencing in neuropsychiatric research
Minerva, A. R., DeBerardine, M., Lin, R., Kim, H. J. J., Rogers, F. D., Rashford, R. L., & Peña, C. J. (2025) · NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s44277-025-00041-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Determining sample size (N) necessary to properly power a sequencing study can be dif fi cult and vary by type of assay [76] but tools have been built to address this question in bulk [77] and single-cell applications [78].”
Schmidt, F., Wu, K.-X., Purwanti, Y., Tan, N., Carbajo, D., Ke, X.-B., Wilm, A., Fehlings, M., Macleod, D., Nardin, A., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1629802 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ward, M. M., Zumbo, P., Joseph, Y., Apollon, A., Alonso, A., Betel, D., Fitzgerald, D. W., Pape, J. W., & Dupnik, K. M. (2025) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaf499 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We used the scPower framework [30] to consider power for scRNA-Seq [31].”
Szymczak, A., Dyson, G., Barrett, M. R., Brawner, C., Hanebutt, N., Guthridge, C. J., Marlin, C., Guthridge, J. M., Mehta-D’souza, P., & Jeffries, M. A. (2026) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.70240 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Social Dominance Reorganizes the Transcriptomic Neuropeptidome in a Highly Social Cichlid FishPreprint
Miller-Crews, I., & Hofmann, H. A. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.07.622449 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alvarez, M., Li, T., Lee, S. H., Arasu, U. T., Selvarajan, I., Örd, T., Rahmani, E., Chen, Z. J., Avram, O., Kar, A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.21.671671 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Often, this will involve balancing depth vs. breadth with budgetary constraints 21 .”
Hsu, C., Liu, Q., & Shyr, Y. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae540 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“A recent method, scPower (Schmid et al. 2021), introduces an analytic formula for power calculation based on Zhu and Lakkis’s DEG analysis method (Zhu and Lakkis 2014). scPower employs the pseudo-bulk approach, assuming pseudobulk counts follow NB distributions.”
MethodAccurate sample deconvolution of pooled snRNA-seq using sex-dependent gene expression patterns
Twa, G., Phillips, R. A., Robinson, N. J., & Day, J. J. (2025) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf156 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Sample size is a key factor in snRNA-seq experimental design, as the number of experimental samples directly influences experimental costs and statistical power [ 4– 6 ].”
Key Concepts in Transcriptomics Data Analysis in the Era of Next-Gen Sequencing
Kumar, S. (2026) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18966-0_11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cerebrovascular vulnerability and fibrosis in human brain aneurysms
Wang, J. C., Kim, C. N., Bhalla, S., Scherschinski, L., Gopinadhan, A., Arul, S., Sanchez, D., Schriber, T. D., Apolonio, A., Gülsuyu, B., et al. (2026) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02326-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fibronectin mediates APOE4-driven blood–brain barrier dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease
Bhattarai, P., Yılmaz, E., Cakir, E. Ö., Tayran, H., Haq, I., Murphy, D., Keller, J. N., Grand, Q. L., Eschbach, J., Çelikkaya, H., et al. (2026) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-026-01204-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Amberg, B., Köchl, F., Kumpesa, N., Prasad, M. K., Bochner, F., Hernandez-Obiols, M., Otteneder, M. B., Stalder, L., Shaffo, F. C., Nowrouzi, A., et al. (2026) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41434-026-00600-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Sample size rationale is supported by power analysis for snRNA-seq [8].”
Strategies for addressing pseudoreplication in multi-patient scRNA-seq dataPreprint
Malfait, M., Gilis, J., den Berge, K. V., Assefa, A. T., Verbist, B. M. P., & Clement, L. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.15.599144 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Such experiments allow for a better characterization of the target population and are hence pivotal for the discovery of reliable biological markers, i.e., genes that are differentially expressed between groups of subjects [2].”
BackgroundCho, S., Laghlali, G., Marín, A., García‐Sastre, A., Singh, G., Schotsaert, M., Song, W., & Forst, C. V. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.21.671587 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
DEPower : approximate power analysis with DESeq2Preprint
Gorin, G., Guruge, D., & Goodman, L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.05.704084 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“As discussed elsewhere, one can avoid this procedure if pilot data are available [12,15], as such data can provide more relevant estimates of the expression levels and the dispersion distribution.”
PerturbPlan: An analytical framework for designing Perturb-seq experimentsPreprint
Niu, Z., He, Y., Galante, J., Gschwind, A. R., Ray, J., Steinmetz, L. M., Engreitz, J., & Katsevich, E. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.22.727199 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“While an analytical power analysis framework exists in the adjacent domain of single-cell differential expression, 24 this tool does not accommodate aspects unique to single-cell CRISPR screens and supports limited design problems (see “Comparison of PerturbPlan to scPower” section in the…”
Benard, B. A., Lalgudi, C. K., Azizi, A., & Gentles, A. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.08.749933 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Due to this constraint, many single-cell and ST studies lack the sample size required to identify robust statistical associations between sample phenotypes (e.g. mutation status, outcomes, etc.) and cell types or locations 14–18 .”
de Vries, D. H. (2022) · doi:10.33612/diss.255266474
Studying the Role of Astrocytes at Synapses Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics
Pestana, F., Belgard, T. G., Voet, T., & Holt, M. G. (2024) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3742-5_9
Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identification and Target Validation
Mukherjee, A., Das, S., Mondal, N. H., Choudhury, A., & Banerjee, S. (2024) · Interdisciplinary biotechnological advances · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1148-2_9
A realistic FastQ-based framework FastQDesign for ScRNA-seq study design issues
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Ahn, K. W., & Lin, C. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07938-8
How to view the female reproductive tract through single-cell looking glasses
Llera-Oyola, J., Pérez-Moraga, R., Parras, M., & Rosón, B. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.040
Essentials of transcriptomic methods: Navigating through RNA sequencing and beyond
Stopa, V., Sopić, M., Li, G., Sluimer, J. C., Basílio, J., van der Laan, S. W., Kreil, D. P., Devaux, Y., & Hochreiter, B. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33064-3.00016-5
Mokhtari, M., Ramnarine, T. J. S., Eicher, A., Braunsperger, A., Baumert, P., Wolf, C., Durmaz, G., Pfaffenstaller, V., Kendirli, A., Kerschensteiner, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.06.687014
The BCG in situ study – novel techniques applied to a 100-year-old vaccine
Schaltz‐Buchholzer, F., Bæk, O., Singh, A., Cá, E., da Silva, I., Aaby, P., Benn, C. S., Kollmann, T. R., & Amenyogbe, N. (2025) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103712
Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals immunological fitness of HIV long-term non-progressors
Shi, M., Chen, R.-F., Wu, T.-J., Liao, Y., Qin, T., Wen, Z.-Y., Liu, J., Chen, X., Lu, B., Yi, C., et al. (2025) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01597-25
“…in this study could represent only a small subset of transcriptionally active infected cells captured during sequencing, and the absence (e.g., in TP2) or low number of detectable RNA + cells in infected patients likely reflects sampling stochasticity and technical sensitivity limits (35).”
Bouland, G. A., Mahfouz, A. E., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26584116
Gillespie, E. R., Grice, L. F., Courtney, I. G., Lao, H. W., Jung, W., Ramkomuth, S., Xie, J., Brown, D. A., Walsham, J., Radford, K. J., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25329618
Bouland, G. A., Mahfouz, A. E., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26584113
Bouland, G. A., Mahfouz, A. E., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26584119
Dong, C. Y., Cen, Y., Song, D., & Li, J. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.23.707578
“However, existing power analysis tools for sc-eQTL studies, powerEQTL [14] and scPower [15], have limitations: powerEQTL relies entirely on user-specified parameters rather than being data-driven, reducing realism, while scPower assumes a simple linear model for eQTL mapping and lacks alternative…”
Sex differences in functional genomic mechanisms of opioid action
Falconnier, C. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3a582f0az7be5z4cefzb85fz594ba4d910cd
Zhang, L., Fu, C., Gao, T., Yang, K., Ouyang, G., & Chen, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1853077
“Although pseudobulk aggregation was used to avoid single-cell pseudo-replication, statistical power remains limited, and power analyses of multi-sample scRNA-seq studies indicate that increasing the number of biological replicates is often more important than increasing cell numbers alone (32).”
Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Cui, H., Wang, H., Yang, Y., & Chang, Y. (2026) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2026.103508
- Authors
- Schmid, K. T., Höllbacher, B., Cruceanu, C., Böttcher, A., Lickert, H., Binder, E. B., Theis, F. J., & Heinig, M.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heinig, Matthias
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-11-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6625-6625
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8595682
- OpenAlex
- W3211534834
- Semantic Scholar
- 1aeafd4db890f4a11c64061242fe173d416cfdaf
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Silicon Valley Community Foundation (182835)
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (182835)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS18053A, 01IS18036A)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, statistical power analysis, sample size optimization, sequencing depth, expression quantitative trait loci, R package, web-based tool
- MeSH terms
- Exome Sequencing, Humans, Research Design, Gene Expression, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Sample Size, Gene Expression Profiling, Quantitative Trait Loci, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review