Cited by 614Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies

Open access
Harismendy, Olivier, Ng, Pauline C, Strausberg, Robert L, Wang, Xiaoyun, Stockwell, Timothy B, Beeson, Karen Y, Schork, Nicholas J, Murray, Sarah S +3 more·2009·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are currently being utilized for targeted sequencing of candidate genes or genomic intervals to perform sequence-based association studies. To evaluate these platforms for this application, we analyzed human sequence generated by the Roche 454, Illumina GA, and the ABI SOLiD technologies for the same 260 kb in four individuals. Results: Local sequence characteristics contribute to systematic variability in sequence coverage (>100-fold difference in per-base coverage), resulting in patterns for each NGS technology that are highly correlated between samples. A comparison of the base calls to 88 kb of overlapping ABI 3730xL Sanger sequence generated for the same samples showed that the NGS platforms all have high sensitivity, identifying >95% of variant sites. At high coverage, depth base calling errors are systematic, resulting from local sequence contexts; as the coverage is lowered additional 'random sampling' errors in base calling occur. Conclusions: Our study provides important insights into systematic biases and data variability that need to be considered when utilizing NGS platforms for population targeted sequencing studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r32

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harismendy, O., Ng, P. C., Strausberg, R. L., Wang, X., Stockwell, T. B., Beeson, K. Y., Schork, N. J., Murray, S. S., Topol, E. J., Levy, S., & Frazer, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Levy, Samuel
  • Frazer, Kelly A
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2009-03-27
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
R32-R32
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2142403957
Cited by
614
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 69
FWCI
35.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (1U54RR025204-01, UL1RR025774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
next-generation sequencing platforms, targeted sequencing, base-calling errors, Sanger sequencing comparison, variant detection sensitivity, systematic bias
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Computer Simulation, False Positive Reactions, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review