Cited by 374Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Discovery of multi-dimensional modules by integrative analysis of cancer genomic data

Open access
Zhang, Shihua, Liu, Chun-Chi, Li, Wenyuan, Shen, Hui, Laird, Peter W., Zhou, Xianghong Jasmine·2012·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Recent technology has made it possible to simultaneously perform multi-platform genomic profiling (e.g. DNA methylation (DM) and gene expression (GE)) of biological samples, resulting in so-called 'multi-dimensional genomic data'. Such data provide unique opportunities to study the coordination between regulatory mechanisms on multiple levels. However, integrative analysis of multi-dimensional genomics data for the discovery of combinatorial patterns is currently lacking. Here, we adopt a joint matrix factorization technique to address this challenge. This method projects multiple types of genomic data onto a common coordinate system, in which heterogeneous variables weighted highly in the same projected direction form a multi-dimensional module (md-module). Genomic variables in such modules are characterized by significant correlations and likely functional associations. We applied this method to the DM, GE, and microRNA expression data of 385 ovarian cancer samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas project. These md-modules revealed perturbed pathways that would have been overlooked with only a single type of data, uncovered associations between different layers of cellular activities and allowed the identification of clinically distinct patient subgroups. Our study provides an useful protocol for uncovering hidden patterns and their biological implications in multi-dimensional 'omic' data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gks725

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • jNMF, PLS, and CCA are frequently employed in multi-omics integration tasks, aiding in the analysis of gene modules and exploring underlying biological mechanisms in the multi-omics latent space.

    “These methods (jNMF, PLS, and CCA) are frequently employed in multi-omics integration tasks, aiding in the analysis of gene modules and exploring underlying biological mechanisms in the multi-omics latent space [42,46].”

    From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction and Materials and Methods describe joint NMF integrating multiple genomic data types in a common space to identify modules of genes, miRNAs and methylation markers. The paper does not establish the sentence’s claims about PLS or CCA, or that all three methods are frequently employed for these tasks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Joint NMF was proposed to integrate multi-omics data with non-negative values.

    “Joint NMF (non-negative matrix factorisation) (Zhang et al., 2012) was proposed to integrate multi-omics data with non-negative values.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2012

  • Joint NMF decomposes the joint matrix into loadings and factors, bringing different omics into a common basis matrix.

    “It involved decomposing the joint matrix into loadings and factors, bringing the different omics into a common basis matrix.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Liu, C.-C., Li, W., Shen, H., Laird, P. W., & Zhou, X. J.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Xianghong Jasmine
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
40
Issue
19
Pages
9379-9391
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2117968640
Cited by
374
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA143882)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM074163)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
DNA methylation, gene expression, microRNA expression, ovarian cancer, tumor subtypes, pathway perturbation, integrative genomics, multi-omics integration
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, DNA Methylation, Genomics, MicroRNAs, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review