Cited by 849Gene expression and cancer classificationCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis

Open access
Shen, Ronglai, Olshen, Adam B., Ladanyi, Marc·2009·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The molecular complexity of a tumor manifests itself at the genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic levels. Genomic profiling at these multiple levels should allow an integrated characterization of tumor etiology. However, there is a shortage of effective statistical and bioinformatic tools for truly integrative data analysis. The standard approach to integrative clustering is separate clustering followed by manual integration. A more statistically powerful approach would incorporate all data types simultaneously and generate a single integrated cluster assignment. Methods: We developed a joint latent variable model for integrative clustering. We call the resulting methodology iCluster. iCluster incorporates flexible modeling of the associations between different data types and the variance–covariance structure within data types in a single framework, while simultaneously reducing the dimensionality of the datasets. Likelihood-based inference is obtained through the Expectation–Maximization algorithm. Results: We demonstrate the iCluster algorithm using two examples of joint analysis of copy number and gene expression data, one from breast cancer and one from lung cancer. In both cases, we identified subtypes characterized by concordant DNA copy number changes and gene expression as well as unique profiles specific to one or the other in a completely automated fashion. In addition, the algorithm discovers potentially novel subtypes by combining weak yet consistent alteration patterns across data types. Availability: R code to implement iCluster can be downloaded at http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/85130.cfm Contact: shenr@mskcc.org Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp543

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous research efforts are focused on utilizing genetic data and artificial intelligence algorithms to develop diagnostic models to enhance the clinical efficiency and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.

    “Currently, numerous research efforts are focused on utilizing genetic data and artificial intelligence algorithms to develop diagnostic models to enhance the clinical efficiency and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis [109,110,111].”
  • iCluster uses principles similar to NMF but allows integration of datasets with negative values.

    “Similarly, Shen (Shen et al., 2009) proposed iCluster framework which used principles similar to NMF but allows integration of datasets having negative values.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Shen et al., 2009

  • iCluster was demonstrated using copy number, mRNA expression and methylation data for cancer subtype discovery in glioblastoma.

    “They showed the functioning of the framework by using copy number, mRNA expression and methylation data to conduct a cancer subtype discovery in glioblastoma.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Shen et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, R., Olshen, A. B., & Ladanyi, M.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Ronglai
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2009-09-16
Volume
25
Issue
22
Pages
2906-2912
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4252676770
Cited by
849
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
integrative clustering, multi-omics integration, breast cancer subtypes, lung cancer subtypes, copy number alterations, gene expression, cancer subtyping, dimensionality reduction, expectation-maximization algorithm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review