The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database
Open accessAbstract
The Pseudomonas Genome Database (http://www.pseudomonas.com) is well known for the application of community-based annotation approaches for producing a high-quality Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 genome annotation, and facilitating whole-genome comparative analyses with other Pseudomonas strains. To aid analysis of potentially thousands of complete and draft genome assemblies, this database and analysis platform was upgraded to integrate curated genome annotations and isolate metadata with enhanced tools for larger scale comparative analysis and visualization. Manually curated gene annotations are supplemented with improved computational analyses that help identify putative drug targets and vaccine candidates or assist with evolutionary studies by identifying orthologs, pathogen-associated genes and genomic islands. The database schema has been updated to integrate isolate metadata that will facilitate more powerful analysis of genomes across datasets in the future. We continue to place an emphasis on providing high-quality updates to gene annotations through regular review of the scientific literature and using community-based approaches including a major new Pseudomonas community initiative for the assignment of high-quality gene ontology terms to genes. As we further expand from thousands of genomes, we plan to provide enhancements that will aid data visualization and analysis arising from whole-genome comparative studies including more pan-genome and population-based approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Cited by
Zhou, N., Jiang, Y., Bergquist, T. R., Lee, A. J., Kacsoh, B. Z., Crocker, A. W., Lewis, K. A., Georghiou, G., Nguyen, H. N., Hamid, M. N., et al. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1835-8 · Cited by 452
Shen, M., Zhang, H., Shen, W., Zou, Z., Lu, S., Li, G., He, X., Agnello, M., Shi, W., Hu, F., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky160 · Cited by 76
Towards robust Pseudomonas cell factories to harbour novel biosynthetic pathways
Bitzenhofer, N. L., Kruse, L., Thies, S., Wynands, B., Lechtenberg, T., Rönitz, J., Kozaeva, E., Wirth, N. T., Eberlein, C., Jaeger, K.-E., et al. (2021) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20200173 · Cited by 75
Evidence for Selection in the Abundant Accessory Gene Content of a Prokaryote Pangenome
Whelan, F. J., Hall, R. J., & McInerney, J. O. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab139 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Winsor, G. L., Griffiths, E. J., Lo, R., Dhillon, B. K., Shay, J. A., & Brinkman, F. S. L.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-11-17
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D646-D653
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2179324586
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.