The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update
Open accessAbstract
The Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID: https://thebiogrid.org) is an open access database dedicated to the annotation and archival of protein, genetic and chemical interactions for all major model organism species and humans. As of September 2016 (build 3.4.140), the BioGRID contains 1 072 173 genetic and protein interactions, and 38 559 post-translational modifications, as manually annotated from 48 114 publications. This dataset represents interaction records for 66 model organisms and represents a 30% increase compared to the previous 2015 BioGRID update. BioGRID curates the biomedical literature for major model organism species, including humans, with a recent emphasis on central biological processes and specific human diseases. To facilitate network-based approaches to drug discovery, BioGRID now incorporates 27 501 chemical-protein interactions for human drug targets, as drawn from the DrugBank database. A new dynamic interaction network viewer allows the easy navigation and filtering of all genetic and protein interaction data, as well as for bioactive compounds and their established targets. BioGRID data are directly downloadable without restriction in a variety of standardized formats and are freely distributed through partner model organism databases and meta-databases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A., Meuleman, W., Ernst, J., Bilenky, M., Yen, A., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Kheradpour, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14248 · Cited by 6,368
The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma
Brennan, C. W., Verhaak, R. G. W., McKenna, A., Campos, B., Noushmehr, H., Salama, S. R., Zheng, S., Chakravarty, D., Sanborn, J. Z., Berman, S. H., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034 · Cited by 5,016
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
The Role of Atg Proteins in Autophagosome Formation
Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T., & Ohsumi, Y. (2011) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005 · Cited by 2,978
Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Nik-Zainal, S., Davies, H., Staaf, J., Ramakrishna, M., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Martincorena, I., Alexandrov, L. B., Martin, S., Wedge, D. C., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17676 · Cited by 2,218
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationIdentification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome
Wang, T., Birsoy, K., Hughes, N. W., Krupczak, K. M., Post, Y., Wei, J. J., Lander, E. S., & Sabatini, D. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac7041 · Cited by 1,617
The BioPlex network: a systematic exploration of the human interactome
Huttlin, E. L., Ting, L., Bruckner, R. J., Gebreab, F., Gygi, M. P., Szpyt, J., Tam, S., Zarraga, G., Colby, G., Baltier, K., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.043 · Cited by 1,425 · cited 2×
“Since the advent of high-throughput approaches to detect protein (1– 3) and genetic interactions (4), the depth of coverage and accuracy of biological interaction networks has continued to improve (5,6), with increased resolution at the level of protein isoforms (7) and metabolites (8,9).”
BackgroundMethodA global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function
Costanzo, M., VanderSluis, B., Koch, E. N., Baryshnikova, A., Pons, C., Tan, G., Wang, W., Usaj, M., Hanchard, J., Lee, S. D., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1420 · Cited by 1,240
Cited by
Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Bork, P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1131 · Cited by 17,749
Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets
Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., Benner, C., & Chanda, S. K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · Cited by 14,611
Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks
Zitnik, M., Agrawal, M., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294 · Cited by 1,501
Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder
Gandal, M. J., Zhang, P., Hadjimichael, E., Walker, R. L., Chen, C., Liu, S., Won, H., van Bakel, H., Varghese, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8127 · Cited by 1,247
Schwartzentruber, J., Cooper, S., Liu, J. Z., Barrio-Hernandez, I., Bello, E., Kumasaka, N., Young, A. M. H., Franklin, R. J. M., Johnson, T., Estrada, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00776-w · Cited by 532
A multidimensional systems biology analysis of cellular senescence in aging and disease
Avelar, R. A., Ortega, J. G., Tacutu, R., Tyler, E. J., Bennett, D., Binetti, P., Budovsky, A., Chatsirisupachai, K., Johnson, E., Murray, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-01990-9 · Cited by 399
Large-scale investigation of the reasons why potentially important genes are ignored
Stoeger, T., Gerlach, M., Morimoto, R. I., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643 · Cited by 261
Wingo, A. P., Dammer, E. B., Breen, M. S., Logsdon, B. A., Duong, D. M., Troncosco, J. C., Thambisetty, M., Beach, T. G., Serrano, G. E., Reiman, E. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09613-z · Cited by 211
Luo, P., Ding, Y., Lei, X., & Wu, F.-X. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00013 · Cited by 107
Molecular basis of GID4-mediated recognition of degrons for the Pro/N-end rule pathway
Dong, C., Zhang, H., Li, L., Tempel, W., Loppnau, P., & Min, J. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-018-0036-1 · Cited by 111
Biophysical prediction of protein–peptide interactions and signaling networks using machine learning
Cunningham, J. M., Rogers, J. R., Koytiger, G., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0687-1 · Cited by 108
Network medicine framework for identifying drug-repurposing opportunities for COVID-19
Morselli Gysi, D., do Valle, Í., Zitnik, M., Ameli, A., Gan, X., Varol, O., Ghiassian, S. D., Patten, J. J., Davey, R. A., Loscalzo, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025581118 · Cited by 107
AlQuraishi, M., & Sorger, P. K. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01283-4 · Cited by 96
Interpretation of cancer mutations using a multiscale map of protein systems
Zheng, F., Kelly, M. R., Ramms, D. J., Heintschel, M. L., Tao, K., Tutuncuoglu, B., Lee, J. J., Ono, K., Foussard, H., Chen, M., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf3067 · Cited by 81
Paralog dependency indirectly affects the robustness of human cells
Dandage, R., & Landry, C. R. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20198871 · Cited by 65
Hall-Roberts, H., Agarwal, D., Obst, J., Smith, T. B., Monzón-Sandoval, J., Di Daniel, E., Webber, C., James, W. S., Mead, E., Davis, J. B., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00709-z · Cited by 62
O’Meara, T. R., O’Meara, M. J., Polvi, E. J., Pourhaghighi, M. R., Liston, S. D., Lin, Z.-Y., Veri, A. O., Emili, A., Gingras, A.-C., & Cowen, L. E. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000358 · Cited by 49
Higher-order molecular organization as a source of biological function
Gaudelet, T., Malod-Dognin, N., & Pržulj, N. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty570 · Cited by 46
A Survey of Gene Prioritization Tools for Mendelian and Complex Human Diseases
Zolotareva, O., & Kleine, M. (2019) · Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2018-0069 · Cited by 46
COVID-19 research risks ignoring important host genes due to pre-established research patterns
Stoeger, T., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61981 · Cited by 30
Validation of a priori candidate Alzheimer’s disease SNPs with brain amyloid-beta deposition
Vacher, M., Porter, T., Villemagne, V. L., Milicic, L., Peretti, M., Fowler, C., Martins, R., Rainey-Smith, S., Ames, D., Masters, C. L., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53604-5 · Cited by 26
Courcelles, M., Coulombe-Huntington, J., Cossette, É., Gingras, A.-C., Thibault, P., & Tyers, M. (2017) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00205 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDrug Target Prioritization for Alzheimer's Disease Using Protein Interaction Network Analysis
Podder, A., Pandit, M., & Narayanan, L. (2018) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2018.0131 · Cited by 14
Network spectra for drug-target identification in complex diseases: new guns against old foes
Rai, A., Shinde, P., & Jalan, S. (2018) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-018-0107-y · Cited by 12
InpherNet accelerates monogenic disease diagnosis using patients’ candidate genes’ neighbors
Yoo, B., Birgmeier, J., Bernstein, J. A., & Bejerano, G. (2021) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01238-2 · Cited by 4
Girisha, M. N., Badiger, V. P., & Pattar, S. (2022) · Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1007/s13721-022-00353-7 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatr-aryamontri, A., Oughtred, R., Boucher, L., Rust, J., Chang, C., Kolas, N. K., O'Donnell, L., Oster, S., Theesfeld, C., Sellam, A., Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B.-J., Dolinski, K., & Tyers, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-12-14
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D369-D379
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2915536738
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 79.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
