Cited by 731Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchImmune Cell Function and Interaction

Allele frequency net database (AFND) 2020 update: gold-standard data classification, open access genotype data and new query tools

Open access
Gonzalez-Galarza, Faviel F, McCabe, Antony, Santos, Eduardo J Melo dos, Jones, James, Takeshita, Louise, Ortega-Rivera, Nestor D, Cid-Pavon, Glenda M Del, Ramsbottom, Kerry +4 more·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Allele Frequency Net Database (AFND, www.allelefrequencies.net) provides the scientific community with a freely available repository for the storage of frequency data (alleles, genes, haplotypes and genotypes) related to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR), major histocompatibility complex Class I chain related genes (MIC) and a number of cytokine gene polymorphisms in worldwide populations. In the last five years, AFND has become more popular in terms of clinical and scientific usage, with a recent increase in genotyping data as a necessary component of Short Population Report article submissions to another scientific journal. In addition, we have developed a user-friendly desktop application for HLA and KIR genotype/population data submissions. We have also focused on classification of existing and new data into ‘gold–silver–bronze’ criteria, allowing users to filter and query depending on their needs. Moreover, we have also continued to expand other features, for example focussed on HLA associations with adverse drug reactions. At present, AFND contains >1600 populations from >10 million healthy individuals, making AFND a valuable resource for the analysis of some of the most polymorphic regions in the human genome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkz1029

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HLA-A*02:01 is the most frequent MHC class I allele in the Caucasian population, with up to 50% of individuals bearing this allele.

    “To maximise the eligible patient population, the epitopes selected for CVGBM were either restricted to HLA-A*02:01 (BCAN, PTPRZ1, NLGNX4) as the most frequent MHC class I allele in the Caucasian population (up to 50% of individuals bearing this allele according to the allele frequency net database [39]), or to various HLA-DR alleles (BIRC5).”

    From Preclinical development of an mRNA-based multiepitope immunotherapeutic for glioblastoma (2025) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Database content section says AFND lets users browse HLA allele and genotype frequencies, but it gives no frequency or ranking for HLA-A*02:01. Searches for HLA-A*02:01, Caucasian or European populations, and 50% found no passage in our copy establishing that it is the most frequent MHC class I allele in that population or that up to 50% of individuals carry it. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalez-Galarza, F. F., McCabe, A., Santos, E. J. M. D., Jones, J., Takeshita, L., Ortega-Rivera, N. D., Cid-Pavon, G. M. D., Ramsbottom, K., Ghattaoraya, G., Alfirevic, A., Middleton, D., & Jones, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Center for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Torreon, Mexico
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (MX)
Corresponding author
  • Middleton, Derek
  • Jones, Andrew R
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
48
Issue
D1
Pages
D783-D788
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2984055282
Cited by
731
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 2
FWCI
45.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Medicine, UAdeC (P/PFCE-2018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
Keywords
HLA, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors, cytokine gene polymorphisms, genotype data, haplotype data, data classification, population genetics
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, HLA Antigens, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, User-Computer Interface, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Genome, Human, Cytokines, Databases, Genetic, Receptors, KIR

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review