The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HawkDock: a web server to predict and analyze the protein–protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA
Open accessAbstract
Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) play an important role in the different functions of cells, but accurate prediction of the three-dimensional structures for PPIs is still a notoriously difficult task. In this study, HawkDock, a free and open accessed web server, was developed to predict and analyze the structures of PPIs. In the HawkDock server, the ATTRACT docking algorithm, the HawkRank scoring function developed in our group and the MM/GBSA free energy decomposition analysis were seamlessly integrated into a multi-functional platform. The structures of PPIs were predicted by combining the ATTRACT docking and the HawkRank re-scoring, and the key residues for PPIs were highlighted by the MM/GBSA free energy decomposition. The molecular visualization was supported by 3Dmol.js. For the structural modeling of PPIs, HawkDock could achieve a better performance than ZDOCK 3.0.2 in the benchmark testing. For the prediction of key residues, the important residues that play an essential role in PPIs could be identified in the top 10 residues for ∼81.4% predicted models and ∼95.4% crystal structures in the benchmark dataset. To sum up, the HawkDock server is a powerful tool to predict the binding structures and identify the key residues of PPIs. The HawkDock server is accessible free of charge at http://cadd.zju.edu.cn/hawkdock/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions
Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L. T., Sternberg, M. J. E., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., & Wodak, S. J. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10381 · Cited by 703
Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Vakser, I. A. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033 · Cited by 318 · cited 1×
“Therefore, determination of their complex structures is critical to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of crucial biological processes (1) and even design compounds that interfere with PPIs with pharmaceutical significance (2).”
BackgroundCorrada, D., Soshilov, A. A., Denison, M. S., & Bonati, L. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004981 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Kumar, S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.11.480029 · Cited by 223
Breaching the Bacterial Envelope: The Pivotal Role of Perforin-2 (MPEG1) Within Phagocytes
Merselis, L. C., Rivas, Z. P., & Munson, G. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.597951 · Cited by 18
Murmu, S., Rashmi, M., Nagrale, D. T., Kour, T., Singh, M. K., Chaurasia, A., Behera, S. K., Shankar, R., Ranjan, R., Jha, G. K., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cotton Research · doi:10.1186/s42397-024-00203-z · Cited by 7
Ruiz-Molina, N., Parsons, J., Decker, E. L., & Reski, R. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.002 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Weng, G., Wang, E., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Zhu, F., Li, D., & Hou, T.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W322-W330
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2945172910
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HawkDock: a web server to predict and analyze the protein–protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkz397
- The paper
- Weng, G., Wang, E., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Zhu, F., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2019). HawkDock: a web server to predict and analyze the protein–protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.