The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Real-time PCR is being used increasingly as the method of choice for mRNA quantification, allowing rapid analysis of gene expression from low quantities of starting template. Despite a wide range of approaches, the same principles underlie all data analysis, with standard approaches broadly classified as either absolute or relative. In this study we use a variety of absolute and relative approaches of data analysis to investigate nocturnal c-fos expression in wild-type and retinally degenerate mice. In addition, we apply a simple algorithm to calculate the amplification efficiency of every sample from its amplification profile. We confirm that nocturnal c-fos expression in the rodent eye originates from the photoreceptor layer, with around a 5-fold reduction in nocturnal c-fos expression in mice lacking rods and cones. Furthermore, we illustrate that differences in the results obtained from absolute and relative approaches are underpinned by differences in the calculated PCR efficiency. By calculating the amplification efficiency from the samples under analysis, comparable results may be obtained without the need for standard curves. We have automated this method to provide a means of streamlining the real-time PCR process, enabling analysis of experimental samples based upon their own reaction kinetics rather than those of artificial standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
Cited by
Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data
Ruijter, J. M., Ramakers, C., Hoogaars, W. M. H., Karlen, Y., Bakker, O., van den Hoff, M. J. B., & Moorman, A. F. M. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp045 · Cited by 3,043
Fantin, A., Vieira, J. M., Gestri, G., Denti, L., Schwarz, Q., Prykhozhij, S., Peri, F., Wilson, S. W., & Ruhrberg, C. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-12-257832 · Cited by 1,153
Beigneux, A. P., Davies, B. S. J., Gin, P., Weinstein, M. M., Farber, E., Qiao, X., Peale, F., Bunting, S., Walzem, R. L., Wong, J. S., et al. (2007) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.02.002 · Cited by 445
Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., Fiori, B., Ranno, S., Torelli, R., & Fadda, G. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.2.668-679.2005 · Cited by 319
Routes to improving the reliability of low level DNA analysis using real-time PCR
Ellison, S. L., English, C. A., Burns, M. J., & Keer, J. T. (2006) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-6-33 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Peirson, S. N.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-07-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 73e-73
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2123247959
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gng073
- The paper
- Peirson, S. N. (2003). Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gng073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.