Cited by 29Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

PSAURON: a tool for assessing protein annotation across a broad range of species

Open access
Sommer, Markus J, Zimin, Aleksey V, Salzberg, Steven L·2025·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Evaluating the accuracy of protein-coding sequences in genome annotations is a challenging problem for which there is no broadly applicable solution. In this manuscript, we introduce PSAURON (Protein Sequence Assessment Using a Reference ORF Network), a novel software tool developed to help assess the quality of protein-coding gene annotations. Utilizing a machine learning model trained on a diverse dataset from over 1000 plant and animal genomes, PSAURON assigns a score to coding DNA or protein sequence that reflects the likelihood that the sequence is a genuine protein-coding region. PSAURON scores can be used for genome-wide protein annotation assessment as well as the rapid identification of potentially spurious annotated proteins. Validation against established benchmarks demonstrates PSAURON’s effectiveness and correlation with recognized measures of protein quality, highlighting its potential use as a widely applicable method to evaluate precision in gene annotation. PSAURON is open source and freely available at https://github.com/salzberg-lab/PSAURON.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nargab/lqae189

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommer, M. J., Zimin, A. V., & Salzberg, S. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Sommer, Markus J
Venue
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-01-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
lqae189-lqae189
ISSN
2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406151775
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-HG006677, R35-GM130151)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-coding region prediction, machine learning classifiers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review