Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereoelectroencephalography in the Presurgical Evaluation of Focal Epilepsy: A Retrospective Analysis of 215 Procedures

Massimo Cossu, Francesco Cardinale, Laura Castana, Alberto Citterio, Stefano Francione, Laura Tassi, Alim Louis Benabid, Giorgio Lo Russo·2005·Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on indications, surgical technique, results, and morbidity of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. METHODS: Two-hundred fifteen stereotactic implantations of multilead intracerebral electrodes were performed in 211 patients (4 patients were explored twice), who showed variable patterns of localizing incoherence among electrical (interictal/ictal scalp electroencephalography), clinical (ictal semeiology), and anatomic (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) investigations. MRI scanning showed a lesion in 134 patients (63%; associated with mesial temporal sclerosis in 7) and no lesion in 77 patients (37%; with mesial temporal sclerosis in 14 patients). A total of 2666 electrodes (mean, 12.4 per patient) were implanted (unilaterally in 175 procedures and bilaterally in 40). For electrode targeting, stereotactic stereoscopic cerebral angiograms were used in all patients, coupled with a coregistered three-dimensional MRI scan in 108 patients. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three patients (87%) were scheduled for resective surgery after SEEG recording, and 174 have undergone surgery thus far. Resections sites were temporal in 47 patients (27%), frontal in 55 patients (31.6%), parietal in 14 patients (8%), occipital in one patient (0.6%), rolandic in one patient (0.6%), and multilobar in 56 patients (32.2%). Outcome on seizures (Engel's classification) in 165 patients with a follow-up period of more than 12 months was: Class I, 56.4%; Class II, 15.1%; Class III, 10.9%; and Class IV, 17.6%. Outcome was significantly associated with the results of MRI scanning (P = 0.0001) and with completeness of lesion removal (P = 0.038). Morbidity related to electrode implantation occurred in 12 procedures (5.6%), with severe permanent deficits from intracerebral hemorrhage in 2 (1%) patients. CONCLUSION: SEEG is a useful and relatively safe tool in the evaluation of surgical candidates when noninvasive investigations fail to localize the epileptogenic zone. SEEG-based resective surgery may provide excellent results in particularly complex drug-resistant epilepsies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.706

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Cossu, M., Cardinale, F., Castana, L., Citterio, A., Francione, S., Tassi, L., Benabid, A. L., & Russo, G. L.
Venue
Neurosurgery
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
706-718
ISSN
0148-396X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056072423
Cited by
332
References
26
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereoelectroencephalography in the Presurgical Evaluation of Focal Epilepsy: A Retrospective Analysis of 215 Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.706
The paper
Cossu, M., Cardinale, F., Castana, L., Citterio, A., Francione, S., Tassi, L., Benabid, A. L., & Russo, G. L. (2005). Stereoelectroencephalography in the Presurgical Evaluation of Focal Epilepsy: A Retrospective Analysis of 215 Procedures. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.706

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.