Cited by 29Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Cessation Among State Quitline Participants with a Mental Health Condition

Kerkvliet, J. L., Wey, H., Fahrenwald, N. L.·2015·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Telephone quitlines are an effective treatment option for tobacco cessation in the general population. Many participants who use quitline services have mental health conditions (MHC), yet few published studies have examined the use of quitline services in this population. This study examined the prevalence of MHC among state quitline participants and compared cessation outcomes among those with and without MHC. METHODS: Demographic and tobacco use data were collected at enrollment and 7 months post-enrollment using standardized assessments for 10,720 eligible participants who enrolled in a state quitline between September, 2010 and August, 2012. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported MHC was 19.8% (2,086/10,720 callers). The intent to treat quit rate for participants with a MHC was 16.4% compared to 21.5% for those without a MHC (p < .001), and the responder quit rate was 36.9% for those with a MHC compared to 44.4% for those without (p < .001). The adjusted odds ratio describing the association of MHC status and tobacco cessation was identical for both the intent-to-treat and responder populations, and indicated that participants with MHC were 23% less likely to quit (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that participants with MHC accessed a state quitline, but were less likely to quit. The finding was independent of other factors influencing tobacco cessation, such as gender, race, and education. These findings indicate that although quitline services are an option for tobacco cessation among persons with MHC, further research is needed to determine why cessation rates are lower.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntu239

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence-based telephone-delivered smoking cessation interventions can be efficacious but have yielded relatively low cessation rates among people with mental health disorders, typically ranging from 3% to 18%.

    “Although evidence-based telephone-delivered smoking cessation interventions can be efficacious [33], they have yielded relatively low cessation rates among people with mental health disorders, typically ranging from 3% to 18% [33, 34, 35, 36, 37].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerkvliet, J. L., Wey, H., & Fahrenwald, N. L.
Affiliations
South Dakota State University (US)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2014-11-09
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
735-741
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2112708384
Cited by
29
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
telephone quitline, tobacco cessation, mental illness, smoking cessation outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Smoking, South Dakota, Telephone, Tobacco Use Disorder, Hotlines, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review