Cited by 68Workplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout ResearchTechnostress in Professional Settings

Work-related stress assessed by a text message single-item stress question

Open access
Arapovic-Johansson, B, Wåhlin, C, Kwak, L, Björklund, C, Jensen, I·2017·Occupational Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of work stress-related ill-health in the Western world, it is important to find cost-effective, easy-to-use and valid measures which can be used both in research and in practice. AIMS: To examine the validity and reliability of the single-item stress question (SISQ), distributed weekly by short message service (SMS) and used for measurement of work-related stress. METHODS: The convergent validity was assessed through associations between the SISQ and subscales of the Job Demand-Control-Support model, the Effort-Reward Imbalance model and scales measuring depression, exhaustion and sleep. The predictive validity was assessed using SISQ data collected through SMS. The reliability was analysed by the test-retest procedure. RESULTS: Correlations between the SISQ and all the subscales except for job strain and esteem reward were significant, ranging from -0.186 to 0.627. The SISQ could also predict sick leave, depression and exhaustion at 12-month follow-up. The analysis on reliability revealed a satisfactory stability with a weighted kappa between 0.804 and 0.868. CONCLUSIONS: The SISQ, administered through SMS, can be used for the screening of stress levels in a working population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/kqx111

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SISQ is a validated single-item measure for screening stress levels in a working population.

    “The SISQ is a single-item measure of current stress on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (“Not at all”) to 5 (“Very much”) and has been validated for the screening of stress levels in a working population [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11]IOM. Capturing Social and Behavioural Domains in Electronic health Records: Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014. 24757748
  2. [14]Leiter MP, Stright N. The Social Context of Work Life: Implications for Burnout and Work Engagement. International Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009; 25– 47.
  3. [18]Åkerstedt T, Knutsson A, Weste rholm P Att predicera sömnstörning, insomningsrisk och mental trötthet – tre delstudier. Psykosocial belastning och riskfaktorer för hjärtkärlsjukdom: Vol. 7. Arbete och Hälsa. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet, 2002.
  4. [25]Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2004; 598– 626.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arapovic-Johansson, B., Wåhlin, C., Kwak, L., Björklund, C., & Jensen, I.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Arapovic-Johansson, B
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
2017-08-18
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
601-608
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W2747728381
Cited by
68
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
occupational stress, short message service, text messaging, stress screening, demand-control-support model, effort-reward imbalance model, convergent validity, predictive validity, test-retest reliability, sick leave, depression, exhaustion, sleep, occupational health surveillance
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Workplace, Sick Leave, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review