The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Archetypal Actions Of Ritual: A Theory Of Ritual Illustrated By The Jain Rite Of Worship
Abstract
Religious rituals can provoke a deeply ambigious reaction in those who practise them. What happens in religious traditions when the nature of the ritual is questioned, but the practice of performing rituals is not itself abandoned? This book draws on the authors' observations of such reactions among Jains in western India, and asks why they can tell us about ritual as a universal mode of human action. Most anthropologists have assumed that ritual is a special kind of happening, which requires a special kind of interpretation. The authors argue that 'ritual' is a quality which can in principle apply to any kind of action. The question they try to answer is: what is distinctive about actions which are ritualized? They reject the common view that ritual carries intrinsic meaning, and explore the apparent paradox that ritualization, which makes action in an important sense non-intentional, is itself the result of an intentional act - the adoption by the actor of what the authors call the 'ritual commitment'.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To the extent that the rituals have little or no actual bearing on the success of instrumental outcomes (Lobmeyer & Wasserman, 1986) and are not based on physical causation (Humphrey & Laidlaw, 1994;Legare & Herrmann, 2013;Legare & Souza, 2012), what motivates this behavior?”
From Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy (2014) · cites this paper as Humphrey & Laidlaw, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354
The Archaeology of Religious Ritual
Fogelin, L. (2007) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094425 · Cited by 257
From spectator to critic and participant: A new role for archaeology in ritual studies
Berggren, Å., & Stutz, L. N. (2010) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/1469605310365039 · Cited by 95
Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy
Legare, C. H., & Souza, A. L. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12077 · Cited by 78
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Conserving the ‘Container’ of Tantric Secrecy: A Discussion with Western Sākta Practitioners
Perkins, S.-A. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12090729 · Cited by 3
Religious History of the Gaṇḍī Beam: Testimonies of Texts, Images and Ritual Practices
Sobkovyak, E. (2015) · Asiatische Studien - Études Asiatiques · doi:10.1515/asia-2015-1001 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphrey, C., & Laidlaw, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1994-09-22
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review