The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design
Abstract
This is a book on the logic of design and hence on how we make, transform, refine, and improve the objects of our knowledge. The starting point is that reality provides the data, to be understood as constraining affordances, and we transform them into information, like semantic engines. Such transformation or repurposing is not equivalent to portraying, or picturing, or photographing, or photocopying anything. It is more like cooking: the dish does not represent the ingredients, it uses them to make something else out of them, yet the reality of the dish and its properties hugely depend on the reality and the properties of the ingredients. Models are not representations understood as pictures, but interpretations understood as data elaborations, of systems. Thus, the whole book may also be read as an articulation and defence of the thesis that knowledge is design, and that philosophy is the ultimate form of conceptual design. This is the third volume in a tetralogy that includes The Philosophy of Information (OUP 2011) and The Ethics of Information (OUP 2013). The three volumes are all written as stand-alone, but they are complementary. By working like a hinge between the two previous books, this third one prepares the basis for volume four, on The Politics of Information. There, the epistemological, conceptual, and normative constructionism supports the study of the design opportunities we have in understanding and shaping what I like to call “the human project” in our information societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5390 · Cited by 1,952
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Fanelli, D. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7 · Cited by 1,248
A product perspective on total data quality management
Wang, R. Y. (1998) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/269012.269022 · Cited by 911
The Rise of Scientific Philosophy
Reichenbach, H. (1951) · doi:10.1525/9780520341760 · Cited by 695
Is Semantic Information Meaningful Data?
FLORIDI, L. (2005) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00531.x · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Cited by
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 · Cited by 882
“It is, therefore, a necessary building block in the creation of an environment that fosters ethical, responsible, and beneficial ML, especially as it also indicates the possibility of a time when the distractive risk of ethics shopping 13 (Floridi 2019c) will be lessened.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWhat the Near Future of Artificial Intelligence Could Be
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00345-y · Cited by 191
Self-citationHuriye, A. Z. (2023) · American Journal of Technology · doi:10.58425/ajt.v2i1.142 · Cited by 84
Contemporary gaps in research on digital divide in education: a literature review
Mirazchiyski, P. V. (2025) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-024-01166-3 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Floridi, L.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- OpenAlex
- W4229575096
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.