The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics
Abstract
Why is two-dimensional semantics important? One can think of it as the most regency act in a drama involving three of the central concepts of philosophy: meaning, reason, and modality. First, Kant linked reason and modality, by suggesting that what is necessary is knowable a priori, and vice versa. Second, Frege linked reason and meaning, by proposing an aspect of meaning (sense) that is constitutively tied to cognitive significance. Third, Carnap linked meaning and modality, by proposing an aspect of meaning (intension) that is constitutively tied to possibility and necessity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kripke, S. A. (1972) · Semantics of Natural Language · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9 · Cited by 7,028
(2010) · Mind, Language and Reality · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625251.014 · Cited by 3,767
Evans, G., & McDowell, J. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,360
Lewis, D. (1979) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184843 · Cited by 1,941
From metaphysics to ethics: a defence of conceptual analysis
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3262 · Cited by 1,469
Frege, G. (1892) · Sammelpunkt - Elektronisch archivierte Theorie · Cited by 1,281
Carnap, R. (1947) · Cited by 1,218
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind
Barresi, J., & Fodor, J. A. (1989) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423122 · Cited by 1,045
Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?
Chalmers, D. J. (2002) · Conceivability and Possibility · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250890.003.0004 · Cited by 894
Self-citationConceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap
Block, N., & Stalnaker, R. (1999) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2998259 · Cited by 621
Cited by
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction
Rosen, G. (2010) · Modality · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.003.0007 · Cited by 1,285
Consciousness and its Place in Nature
Chalmers, D. J. (2003) · The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind · doi:10.1002/9780470998762.ch5 · Cited by 574
Self-citationBrogaard, B., & Salerno, J. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0196-6 · Cited by 288
Frege’s Puzzle and the Objects of Credence
Chalmers, D. J. (2011) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzr046 · Cited by 113
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chalmers, D. J.
- Venue
- Two-Dimensional Semantics
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2006-04-06
- Pages
- 55-140
- OpenAlex
- W2211014290
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 32.64
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780199271955.003.0004
- The paper
- Chalmers, D. J. (2006). The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics. Two-Dimensional Semantics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199271955.003.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
