Cited by 463Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Meaning in Life

Steger, Michael F.·2009·The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology

Abstract

In this chapter, it is argued that meaning in life is an important variable for human well-being. Literature supporting this contention is reviewed, and complexities regarding defining meaning in life are discussed. Definitions of meaning have focused on several components, two of which appear central and unique to meaning in life, suggesting a conceptual framework of meaning in life comprised of two pillars: comprehension and purpose. Comprehension encompasses people's ability to find patterns, consistency, and significance in the many events and experiences in their lives, and their synthesis and distillation of the most salient, important, and motivating factors. People face the challenge of understanding their selves, the world around them, and their unique niche and interactions within the world, and the notion of comprehension unifies these domains of understanding. Purpose refers to highly motivating, long-term goals about which people are passionate and highly committed. In the framework presented in this chapter, it is suggested that people devote significant resources to the pursuit of their purposes and that the most effective and rewarding purposes arise from and are congruent with people's comprehension of their lives. Literature is reviewed regarding where meaning might come from, and other dimensions of meaning are considered (i.e., sources of meaning and search for meaning). Suggestions for future research are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Encouraging clients to reflect on life aspirations, avoidance and control strategies, and personal values is consistent with purpose in life.

    “Encouraging clients to think about life aspirations, reflecting on avoidance and control strategies, and focusing on becoming aware of meaningful personal values and making decisions based on those values remain consistent with purpose in life (McKnight & Kashdan, 2009; Steger, 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steger, M. F.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Steger, Michael F.
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology
Published
2009-07-30
Pages
678-688
OpenAlex
W1680898947
Cited by
463
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 21
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
meaning in life, human well-being, meaning of life, comprehension, sources of meaning, search for meaning, long-term goals, self-understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review