Cited by 4Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Measuring meaning in life by combining philosophical and psychological distinctions: Psychometric properties of the Comprehensive Measure of Meaning

Padgett, R. Noah, Hanson, Jeffrey, Nakamura, Julia S., Ritchie-Dunham, James L., Kim, Eric S., VanderWeele, Tyler J.·2025·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

Meaning, a fundamental component of human well-being, can be categorized into seven interrelated subdomains, as our study provides evidence for. These categories nest within a previously established tripartite classification of meaning in life (e.g. coherence, significance, and direction/purpose). We present the psychological and philosophical distinctions that led to the development of the Comprehensive Measure of Meaning (CMM). We provide empirical evidence for the reliability of scores and validity of the CMM using a longitudinal sample of college students (N = 4058) and a large, diverse sample from a Latin American financial institution (N = 8794). The measurement of individuals’ perception of their meaning in life is internally consistent, and we present results based on an innovative method to explore conceptual distinctions. Finally, we provide recommendations on using the CMM as a measure of individuals’ perceptions of their meaning in life and avenues for potentially beneficial modifications researchers might consider based on their intended uses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2024.2403367

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padgett, R. N., Hanson, J., Nakamura, J. S., Ritchie-Dunham, J. L., Kim, E. S., & VanderWeele, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Harvard University
Corresponding author
Padgett, R. Noah
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2024-09-16
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
682-698
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W4402572883
Cited by
4
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (61665)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meaning in life, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, coherence, significance, purpose, well-being, university students, financial institution employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review