Cited by 249Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Hedonic Versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Well-being: Evidence of Differential Associations With Self-reported Well-being

McMahan, Ethan A., Estes, David·2011·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
McMahan, Ethan A.
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2010-08-27
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
93-108
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2091426654
Cited by
249
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, self-reported well-being, positive psychology, subjective well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review