The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reporting, Appraising, and Integrating Data on Genotype Prevalence and Gene-Disease Associations
Abstract
The recent completion of the first draft of the human genome sequence and advances in technologies for genomic analysis are generating tremendous opportunities for epidemiologic studies to evaluate the role of genetic variants in human disease. Many methodological issues apply to the investigation of variation in the frequency of allelic variants of human genes, of the possibility that these influence disease risk, and of assessment of the magnitude of the associated risk. Based on a Human Genome Epidemiology workshop, a checklist for reporting and appraising studies of genotype prevalence and studies of gene-disease associations was developed. This focuses on selection of study subjects, analytic validity of genotyping, population stratification, and statistical issues. Use of the checklist should facilitate the integration of evidence from these studies. The relation between the checklist and grading schemes that have been proposed for the evaluation of observational studies is discussed. Although the limitations of grading schemes are recognized, a robust approach is proposed. Other issues in the synthesis of evidence that are particularly relevant to studies of genotype prevalence and gene-disease association are discussed, notably identification of studies, publication bias, criteria for causal inference, and the appropriateness of quantitative synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Self-citationThe sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?
Hill, A. B. (1965) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576505800503 · Cited by 6,974
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease.
BERLIN, J. A., & COLDITZ, G. A. (1990) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115704 · Cited by 1,382
Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences
Thornton, A. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00161-4 · Cited by 1,291
Risch, N., & Teng, J. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.12.1273 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Genetic Mapping in Human Disease
Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Lander, E. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156409 · Cited by 1,452
Little, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Moher, D., Gagnon, F., von Elm, E., Khoury, M. J., Cohen, B., Davey-Smith, G., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022 · Cited by 811
Self-citationAssociation of apolipoprotein E genotypes with lipid levels and coronary risk
Bennet, A. M., Di Angelantonio, E., Ye, Z., Wensley, F., Dahlin, A., Ahlbom, A., Keavney, B., Collins, R., Wiman, B., de Faire, U., et al. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.11.1300 · Cited by 794
Meta-Analysis: Apolipoprotein E Genotypes and Risk for Coronary Heart Disease
Song, Y., Stampfer, M. J., & Liu, S. (2004) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00013 · Cited by 528
What makes a good genetic association study?
Hattersley, A. T., & McCarthy, M. I. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67531-9 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, J., Bradley, L., Bray, M. S., Clyne, M., Dorman, J., Ellsworth, D. L., Hanson, J., Khoury, M., Lau, J., O'Brien, T. R., Rothman, N., Stroup, D., Taioli, E., Thomas, D., Vainio, H., Wacholder, S., & Weinberg, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-08-15
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 300-310
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2018480908
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reporting, Appraising, and Integrating Data on Genotype Prevalence and Gene-Disease Associations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a000179
- The paper
- Little, J., Bradley, L., Bray, M. S., Clyne, M., Dorman, J., Ellsworth, D. L., Hanson, J., Khoury, M., Lau, J., O'Brien, T. R., Rothman, N., Stroup, D., Taioli, E., Thomas, D., Vainio, H., Wacholder, S., & Weinberg, C. (2002). Reporting, Appraising, and Integrating Data on Genotype Prevalence and Gene-Disease Associations. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a000179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.