Cited by 794Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with lipid levels and coronary risk

Open access
Bennet, Anna M., Di Angelantonio, Emanuele, Ye, Zheng, Wensley, Frances, Dahlin, Anette, Ahlbom, Anders, Keavney, Bernard, Collins, Rory +3 more·2007·JAMA

Abstract

Context Previous reviews of associations of apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype and coronary disease have been dominated by smaller studies that are liable to biases. Objective To reassess associations of apoE genotypes with circulating lipid levels and with coronary risk. Data sources We conducted an updated meta-analysis including both published and previously unreported studies, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database published between January 1970 and January 2007, reference lists of articles retrieved, and a registry of relevant studies. Study selection Eighty-two studies of lipid levels (86,067 healthy participants) and 121 studies of coronary outcomes (37,850 cases and 82,727 controls) were identified, with prespecified principal focus on studies with at least 1000 healthy participants for lipids and those with at least 500 coronary outcomes. Data extraction Information on genotype frequencies, lipid levels, coronary outcomes, and laboratory and population characteristics were recorded independently by 2 investigators and/or supplied by study investigators. Results In the most extreme comparison, people with the epsilon2/epsilon2 genotype had 1.14 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.40 mmol/L [44.0 mg/dL; 95% CI; 33.6-51.1 mg/dL]) or about 31% (95% CI, 23%-38%) lower mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values than those with the epsilon4/epsilon4 genotype. There were approximat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.298.11.1300

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennet, A. M., Di Angelantonio, E., Ye, Z., Wensley, F., Dahlin, A., Ahlbom, A., Keavney, B., Collins, R., Wiman, B., de Faire, U., & Danesh, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2007-09-19
Volume
298
Issue
11
Pages
1300
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2106611664
Cited by
794
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 49
FWCI
45.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE genotype, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, circulating lipids, coronary heart disease risk, genetic association, ε4 allele, genetic polymorphism, serum lipids, meta-regression, heterogeneous effects, publication bias
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins E, Coronary Disease, Genotype, Humans, Lipids, Cholesterol, LDL, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review