The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skin Cancer in a Subtropical Australian Population: Incidence and Lack of Association with Occupation
Abstract
Because it is not possible to monitor skin cancer accurately using routine methods, special surveys have been undertaken in Nambour, a typical subtropical community in Queensland, Australia. Estimates of incidence reported here are based on skin cancers medically treated between 1985 and 1992 and new cases diagnosed by dermatologists in two examination clinics in 1986 and 1992. Among men and women aged 18-69 years in 1986, age-adjusted incidence rates of basal cell carcinoma were 2,074 and 1,579 per 100,000 per year, respectively-the highest incidence rates of a specific cancer ever reported. Squamous cell carcinoma occurred at half the rate of basal cell carcinoma among men and at about one third the rate among women. Although as expected, fair skin, a history of repeated sunburns, and nonmalignant solar skin damage diagnosed by dermatologists were strongly associated with both types of skin cancer, outdoor occupation was not. Significant self-selection was observed among outdoor workers, whereby people with fair or medium complexions and a tendency to sunburn were systematically underrepresented among those in long-term outdoor occupations although they accounted for more than 80 percent of the community study sample. The mitigating effect of this selection bias may partly explain the paradox of the lack of quantitative evidence of a causal link between sun exposure and skin cancer in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Kollias, N., Sayre, R. M., Zeise, L., & Chedekel, M. R. (1991) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/1011-1344(91)80147-a · Cited by 482
Cited by
Rhodes, L. E., de Rie, M., Enström, Y., Groves, R., Morken, T., Goulden, V., Wong, G. A. E., Grob, J.-J., Varma, S., & Wolf, P. (2004) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.140.1.17 · Cited by 355
Morton, C., Horn, M., Leman, J., Tack, B., Bedane, C., Tjioe, M., Ibbotson, S., Khemis, A., & Wolf, P. (2006) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.142.6.729 · Cited by 256
Darlington, S., Williams, G., Neale, R., Frost, C., & Green, A. (2003) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.139.4.451 · Cited by 238
Self-citationEffects of sunscreen on skin cancer and photoaging
Iannacone, M. R., Hughes, M. C. B., & Green, A. C. (2014) · Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine · doi:10.1111/phpp.12109 · Cited by 118
Self-citationIntake of antioxidant nutrients and the risk of skin cancer
Heinen, M. M., Hughes, M. C., Ibiebele, T. I., Marks, G. C., Green, A. C., & van der Pols, J. C. (2007) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.005 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nambour Study Group, Green, A., Battistutta, D., Hart, V., Leslie, D., & Weedon, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1034-1040
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2072148825
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin Cancer in a Subtropical Australian Population: Incidence and Lack of Association with Occupation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008875
- The paper
- Nambour Study Group, Green, A., Battistutta, D., Hart, V., Leslie, D., & Weedon, D. (1996). Skin Cancer in a Subtropical Australian Population: Incidence and Lack of Association with Occupation. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.