Cited by 238Skin Protection and AgingNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesOral Health Pathology and Treatment

A randomized controlled trial to assess sunscreen application and beta carotene supplementation in the prevention of solar keratoses

Darlington, Steven, Williams, Gail, Neale, Rachel, Frost, Christine, Green, Adèle·2003·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Solar keratoses (SKs) are among the strongest determinants of skin cancer, but little is known about the success of measures to control these common skin tumors. Objective To determine whether daily sunscreen application and/or beta carotene supplementation retards the rate of occurrence of SKs in adults in the medium term. Design Randomized controlled trial conducted between February 1992 and August 1996. Setting General community of the subtropical township of Nambour, Australia (latitude, 26 degrees south). Participants A total of 1621 adults aged 25 to 74 years. Interventions Participants were randomized to daily use of sunscreen (application of a high-protection sunscreen to their head, neck, arms, and hands every morning) or application of sunscreen at their usual discretionary rate. They were also randomly assigned to take either one 30-mg tablet of beta carotene or one placebo tablet each day. Main outcome measure Change in the prevalent number of SKs in the intervention group relative to change in the control group. Results The ratio of SK counts in 1994 relative to 1992 was lower in people randomized to daily sunscreen use (1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.39) than in those randomized to discretionary sunscreen use (1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.84). This 24% reduction is equivalent to the prevention of an average of 1 additional SK per person over that time. A reduction in the rate of change of SK prevalence was also seen in the sunscreen in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.139.4.451

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darlington, S., Williams, G., Neale, R., Frost, C., & Green, A.
Affiliations
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Neale, Rachel
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
451-5
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034256479
Cited by
238
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
actinic keratosis, sunscreen use, beta-carotene supplementation, skin cancer prevention, sun protection, adults, subtropical climate
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Humans, Keratosis, Middle Aged, Sunlight, Sunscreening Agents, beta Carotene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review