The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EFFECTS OF INTRAINDIVIDUAL AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN REPEATED DIETARY RECORDS
Abstract
In this study 5,115 daily diet records were collected from 151 women on two randomly selected days per sampling month (29 days) over a two-year period. Yearly estimates of the ratios of intraindividual (sigma w2) and interindividual (sigma b2) variance components were calculated for dietary intake of 15 nutrients and for dietary intake + vitamin/mineral supplements. From one year to the next, corresponding ratios of sigma w2/sigma b2 were nearly identical. Intraindividual variation in dietary intake of all 15 nutrients was greater than interindividual variation (sigma w2/sigma b2 greater than 1). Variance component ratios for highly supplemented nutrients such as iron, vitamin C and B vitamins were less than one (sigma w2/sigma b2 less than 1). Using the ratios of sigma w2/sigma b2, it was calculated that between six and 99 repeated records measuring dietary intake and between two and 31 records measuring total intake may be needed per individual to ensure that the estimate of the population correlation (rho DF) between an individual's "usual" dietary intake or total intake of a dietary risk factor and an individual's mean or usual level of a physiologic risk factor was within 10% of the true population correlation coefficient (rho xy). It was also found that twice as many dietary records per individual were required to estimate the population slope (beta xy) within 10%. These results have serious implications for the design and analysis of prospective nutritional studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Markers of the Validity of Reported Energy Intake
Livingstone, M. B. E., & Black, A. E. (2003) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/133.3.895s · Cited by 1,081
Measurement of dietary intake in children
Livingstone, M. B. E., & Robson, P. J. (2000) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665100000318 · Cited by 750
Nutrient intakes of individuals from food-insufficient households in the United States.
Rose, D., & Oliveira, V (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.12.1956 · Cited by 342
Ledikwe, J. H., Blanck, H. M., Khan, L. K., Serdula, M. K., Seymour, J. D., Tohill, B. C., & Rolls, B. J. (2005) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.2.273 · Cited by 320
Guendelman, S., & Abrams, B. (1995) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.85.1.20 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- SEMPOS, C. T., JOHNSON, N. E., SMITH, E. L., & GILLIGAN, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-130
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1904220704
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECTS OF INTRAINDIVIDUAL AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN REPEATED DIETARY RECORDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113974
- The paper
- SEMPOS, C. T., JOHNSON, N. E., SMITH, E. L., & GILLIGAN, C. (1985). EFFECTS OF INTRAINDIVIDUAL AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN REPEATED DIETARY RECORDS. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.