Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EXISTENCE OF CONSISTENT HYPO- AND HYPERRESPONDERS TO DIETARY CHOLESTEROL IN MAN1

Open access
KATAN, MARTIJN B., BEYNEN, ANTON C., DE VRIES, JEANNE H. M., NOBELS, ANJA·1986·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Hyper- and hyporesponsiveness of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol is an established concept in animals but not in man. The authors studied the stability of the individual response of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol in three controlled experiments in 1982. The subjects were volunteers from the general population living in or near Wageningen, the Netherlands. Each experiment had a low-cholesterol baseline period (121, 106, and 129 mg/day in experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and a high-cholesterol test period (625, 673, and 989 mg/day). Duplicate portion analysis showed that dietary cholesterol was the only variable. The 94 healthy men and women who completed experiment 1 showed an increase (mean +/- standard deviation (SD] in serum cholesterol of 0.50 +/- 0.39 mmol/liter (19 +/- 15 mg/dl). Seventeen putative hyperresponders, defined by their response in experiment 1, were retested in experiments 2 and 3; they showed responses of 0.28 +/- 0.38 mmol/liter (11 +/- 15 mg/dl) and 0.82 +/- 0.35 mmol/liter (32 +/- 14 mg/dl), respectively. Fifteen hyporesponders, selected in experiment 1, showed responses in experiments 2 and 3 of 0.06 +/- 0.35 mmol/liter (2 +/- 14 mg/dl) and 0.47 +/- 0.26 mmol/liter (18 +/- 10 mg/dl), significantly lower than the corresponding values for hyperresponders. The standardized regression coefficient for individual responses in experiment 2 on those in experiment 1 was beta = 0.34 (p = 0.03, n = 32); the corresponding regression coefficient for experiment 3 and experiment 1 was 0.53 (p less than 0.01). After correction for intraindividual fluctuations the true responsiveness distribution was found to have a between-subject standard deviation of about 0.29 mmol/liter (11 mg/dl). This implies that if the mean response to a certain dietary cholesterol load amounts to e.g., 0.58 mmol/liter (22 mg/dl), then the 16% of subjects least susceptible to diet will experience a rise of only 0.29 mmol/liter (11 mg/dl) or less, while in the 16% of subjects most susceptible to diet, serum cholesterol will rise by 0.87 mmol/liter (34 mg/dl) or more. The authors conclude that modest differences in responsiveness of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol do exist in man, and that the wide scatter of responses observed in single experiments is largely due to chance fluctuations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114231

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
KATAN, M. B., BEYNEN, A. C., DE VRIES, J. H. M., & NOBELS, A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1986-02
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
221-234
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2164978843
Cited by
259
References
0
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXISTENCE OF CONSISTENT HYPO- AND HYPERRESPONDERS TO DIETARY CHOLESTEROL IN MAN1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114231
The paper
KATAN, M. B., BEYNEN, A. C., DE VRIES, J. H. M., & NOBELS, A. (1986). EXISTENCE OF CONSISTENT HYPO- AND HYPERRESPONDERS TO DIETARY CHOLESTEROL IN MAN1. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.