Cited by 118Workplace Health and Well-beingMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Psychologic Stress in the Workplace and Spontaneous Abortion

Fenster, Laura, Schaefer, Catherine, Mathur, Ashwini, Hiatt, Robert A., Pieper, Carl, Hubbard, Alan E., Von Behren, Julie, Swan, Shanna H.·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The relation of work-related psychologic stress to spontaneous abortion was examined in a prospective study of 3,953 pregnant, employed members of a prepaid health plan in California, recruited between 1990 and 1991. Information on occupation, psychologic stress-related factors at work, social support at work, physical exertion at work, life events, pregnancy worries, and potential confounders was obtained by a telephone interview. Psychologic job stress and social support at work were assessed using an abbreviated version of the instrument developed by Karasek and colleagues (Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1986). Results from the multivariate model indicated that, overall, stressful work was not associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion. However, interactions were observed between stressful work and maternal age over 32 years (p = 0.04), cigarette smoking (p = 0.02), and primigravidity (p = 0.06). Relative to the odds ratio for stressful work in young, nonsmoking, multigravid women without a history of two or more spontaneous abortions, the odds ratios for spontaneous abortion given stressful work were higher by 2.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-5.81) for older women, 2.96 (95% CI 1.16-7.52) for smokers, and 2.27 (95% CI 0.97-5.27) for primigravid women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117576

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenster, L., Schaefer, C., Mathur, A., Hiatt, R. A., Pieper, C., Hubbard, A. E., Von Behren, J., & Swan, S. H.
Affiliations
  • California Health and Human Services Agency (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Department of Health Services (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-12-01
Volume
142
Issue
11
Pages
1176-1183
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2142686474
Cited by
118
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R3MH50508A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
psychological stress, occupational stress, miscarriage, pregnancy, social support at work, maternal age, cigarette smoking, life events
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Occupational Exposure, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review