Cited by 76Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

Infertility: Incidence of spontaneous abortion in clomiphene pregnancies

Dickey, R. P., Taylor, S. N., Curole, D. N., Rye, P. H., Pyrzak, R.·1996·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of clomiphene results in a higher incidence of spontaneous abortion than occurs naturally in subfertile patients. Reproductive outcomes of 1744 clomiphene pregnancies were compared to outcomes of 3245 spontaneous pregnancies in a prospective study. Abortion was classified as clinical if a sac was seen on ultrasound or if it occurred after 6 gestational weeks, and as preclinical if a quantitative human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was > or = 25 mIU and no sac was seen or abortion occurred earlier. The overall incidence of abortion was higher for clomiphene pregnancies (23.7%), compared with spontaneous pregnancies (20.4%) (P < 0.01). Preclinical abortions were increased by clomiphene for all ages (5.8 versus 3.9%, P < 0.01) and for age > or = 30 years (8.0 versus 4.9%, P < 0.001), but not for age < 30 years (3.7 versus 3.0%). Clinical abortions were increased by clomiphene for age < 30 years (15.9 versus 11.2%) (P < 0.01), but not for age > or = 30 years (20.1 versus 22.3%) or all ages (18.0 versus 16.4%). Clinical abortions occurred 22% less often following clomiphene compared with spontaneous pregnancies for patients with luteal insufficiency (18.3 versus 23.6%, P < 0.05). We conclude that the increase in abortion due to clomiphene is small and may be related to different causes for women aged < 30 and > or = 30 years, and also that clomiphene may decrease clinical abortions in patients with luteal insufficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019182

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickey, R. P., Taylor, S. N., Curole, D. N., Rye, P. H., & Pyrzak, R.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Dickey, R. P.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1996-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2623-2628
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2016380394
Cited by
76
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
clomiphene citrate, miscarriage, infertility, subfertility, luteal insufficiency, maternal age, pregnancy outcomes, ovulation induction
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Clomiphene, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Gestational Age, Humans, Menotropins, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review