The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment
Abstract
A semi-quantitative and non-invasive method for scoring embryos obtained after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been defined, aiming at selection of embryos before transfer and at prognostic evaluation of IVF trials. Grading of embryos observed on the inverted microscope was essentially based on the amount of anucleate fragments expelled during early cleavage and on developmental speed. Embryos endowed with a high score were more often associated with pregnancy and in particular with the occurrence of multiple pregnancy. No difference was observed between scores attributed to embryos related to ongoing, aborted or chemical pregnancies. Average embryonic scores corresponding to double and triple transfers differed significantly in failures as well as pregnancies. The better quality of embryos replaced in triple transfers was also apparent from the significantly higher implantation rate per embryo observed in this group. From our results, five criteria including clinical data and embryonic scores can be derived for defining a high risk of multiple pregnancy prior to transfer. It might be warranted to replace only two embryos when these conditions are fulfilled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ziebe, S., Petersen, K., Lindenberg, S., Andersen, A. G., Gabrielsen, A., & Andersen, A. N. (1997) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/12.7.1545 · Cited by 474
Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates
Wong, K. M., Mastenbroek, S., & Repping, S. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027 · Cited by 266
Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., & Wells, D. (2014) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gat073 · Cited by 189
Bolton, V. N., Hawes, S. M., Taylor, C. T., & Parsons, J. H. (1989) · Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer · doi:10.1007/bf01134578 · Cited by 183
Qin, Y., Zhao, Z., Sun, M., Geng, L., Che, L., & Chen, Z.-J. (2011) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-9 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Puissant, F., Van Rysselberge, M., Barlow, P., Deweze, J., & Leroy, F.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 705-708
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W1936975227
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618
- The paper
- Puissant, F., Van Rysselberge, M., Barlow, P., Deweze, J., & Leroy, F. (1987). Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.