Cited by 41Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementAI in cancer detection

Chapter 10: Cervical Cancer Screening Using Visualization Techniques

Open access
Wright, T. C.·2003·JNCI Monographs

Abstract

There is a resurgence of interest in the use of visual techniques to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). These visual techniques can be divided into two general categories. One is the simple visual screening method, such as direct visual inspection (DVI), during which the cervix is visualized with either the naked eye or a low-power magnification device after the application of a solution of 3% to 5% acetic acid that is used as a chemical contrast agent to highlight regions of CIN. DVI has been evaluated in a number of large clinical trials and is considered by some to be a possible alternative to cervical cytology for primary cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. The advantages of DVI compared with cervical cytology for these settings are that it is inexpensive, it does not require a laboratory infrastructure, and it provides an immediate result, allowing the use of "screen and treat" protocols. The major disadvantage of DVI is that it is relatively nonspecific and that its sensitivity is low compared with testing for human papillomavirus. The other category of visual techniques includes devices that use electro-optical sensors and light of specific wavelengths produced by lasers or specialized light sources to identify and localize regions of CIN on the cervix. Although these "high-technology" devices are not yet in routine clinical use, several groups and companies have such devices in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003485

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Wainwright H, Wright TC, Jr. Evaluation of alternative methods of cervical cancer screening for resource-poor settings. Cancer 2000;89:826-33.
  2. Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screen- ing: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1999;87:48-55.
  3. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Dhakad N, Shyamalaku- mary B, Amma NS, et al. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors. Cancer 1998;83:2150-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, T. C.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, T. C.
Venue
JNCI Monographs
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
2003
Issue
31
Pages
66-71
ISSN
  • 1052-6773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6614
OpenAlex
W2111936115
Cited by
41
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Monographs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, visual inspection with acetic acid, acetic acid, resource-limited settings, cervical cytology, HPV testing, screen-and-treat, laser-based detection, electro-optical sensors
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Physical Examination, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review