The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutation accumulation in nuclear, organelle, and prokaryotic transfer RNA genes
Abstract
A comparative analysis of the transfer RNA genes in the genomes of the major kingdoms of eukaryotes and prokaryotes leads to the general conclusion that the rate of evolution of organelle tRNA genes is typically equal to of greater than that of their nuclear counterparts. Situations where this is not the case, most notably in vascular plants, are attributable to an elevated mutation rate in the nuclear genome. Through a comparison of rates of mutation with rates of nucleotide substitution, it is shown that there is a reduction in the efficiency of selection on new mutations in organelle genes. Numerous lines of evidence, including observed reductions in stem duplex stability and changes in loop sizes, suggest that the excess changes observed in the organelle genes are mildly deleterious. Uniparental inheritance of organelles causes a reduction in the efficiency of selection through the joint effects of an increase in linkage disequilibrium and a decrease in effective population size. These results provide molecular support for the idea that asexually propagating genomes are subject to long-term, gradual fitness loss and raise questions about the role of organelle mutations in the long-term survival of major phylogenetic lineages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.
Birky, C. W. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331 · Cited by 969
Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.470 · Cited by 581
Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences Among Metazoan Phyla
Wray, G. A., Levinton, J. S., & Shapiro, L. H. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.568 · Cited by 511
The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa
Morris, S. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361219a0 · Cited by 389
Cited by
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Self-citationGene Transfer from Organelles to the Nucleus: How Much, What Happens, and Why?1
Martin, W., & Herrmann, R. G. (1998) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.118.1.9 · Cited by 704
The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana
Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Zabeau, M., & Van de Peer, Y. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.212522399 · Cited by 494
PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION
Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D., Kibota, T., Schultz, S., Vassilieva, L., & Willis, J. (1999) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05361.x · Cited by 450
Self-citationOrigin and Evolution of the Mitochondrial Proteome
Kurland, C. G., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.786-820.2000 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 914-925
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W1967598050
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation accumulation in nuclear, organelle, and prokaryotic transfer RNA genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025834
- The paper
- Lynch, M. (1997). Mutation accumulation in nuclear, organelle, and prokaryotic transfer RNA genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.