The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Open accessAbstract
A simple model for the evolution of the rate of molecular evolution is presented. With a Bayesian approach, this model can serve as the basis for estimating dates of important evolutionary events even in the absence of the assumption of constant rates among evolutionary lineages. The method can be used in conjunction with any of the widely used models for nucleotide substitution or amino acid replacement. It is illustrated by analyzing a data set of rbcL protein sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“To convert this tree from units of time to molecular evolutionary units, the rates are either assigned to branches [ 15, 17] or to nodes [ 53, 54].”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Assigning an age to a particular node is only possible when the tree itself is assumed to be known and fixed, a limitation of previous relaxed-clock implementations [ 15, 17, 54].”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Such a model permits independent gain and loss of conservation on multiple lineages and also encourages nearby branches to have the same state and substitution rate, which is reasonable for closely related species and branches in a phylogeny and is also a common assumption in phylogenetics”
From Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees (2019) · cites this paper as Thorne et al. 1998
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, it has been realized that less drastic alternatives to the unrooted model of phylogeny may exist. Instead of dispensing with the molecular clock entirely, attempts have been made to relax the molecular clock assumption by allowing the rate to vary across the tree [ 13– 15].”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These model the molecular rate among lineages as varying in an autocorrelated manner, with the rate in each branch being drawn (a priori) from a parametric distribution whose mean is a function of the rate on the parent branch.”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The molecular clock assumption can be relaxed in a variety of ways [ 13– 15, 17, 49– 52].”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The first such model to be described [ 15] assigned rates to the midpoints of branches and the assumed lognormal prior distribution relating the midpoint of the ancestral branch to the midpoint of the derived branch.”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the autocorrelated relaxed-clock models that have been described, including the commonly used lognormal model [ 15, 17, 55], it is also necessary to specify the degree of autocorrelation as a prior.”
From Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne, Kishino, and Painter (1998) and Aris-Brosou and Yang (2002) implemented parametric models in which the rate in a given branch (the descendant rate) is a priori related to the rate in the branch immediately ancestral to it (the parent rate).”
From Accuracy of Rate Estimation Using Relaxed-Clock Models with a Critical Focus on the Early Metazoan Radiation (2005) · cites this paper as Thorne, Kishino, and Painter 1998
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the relaxed clock approach retrieves the true divergence times (Table 1) when substitution rates are distributed according to the autocorrelated-rate model developed by Thorne et al. (32).”
From The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? (2004) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“However, protein evolution is not homogeneous.”
From Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals (2017) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“Different sites and lineages accumulate substitutions at different rates (e.g., [67-69])”
From Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals (2017) · cites this paper as [68]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,687
The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · Cited by 7,003
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics.
Aa, Stuart, A., & Ord, K. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291187 · Cited by 2,663
Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis
Carlin, B. P., & Louis, T. A. (2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s608 · Cited by 2,110
Probability Distribution of Molecular Evolutionary Trees: A New Method of Phylogenetic Inference
Rannala, B. H., & Yang, Z. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02338839 · Cited by 1,751
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [8]8. KARLIN, S., and H. M. TAYLOR. 1975. A first course in sto- chastic processes. 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 998
SPERLING, E. A., ROBINSON, J. M., PISANI, D., & PETERSON, K. J. (2010) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00225.x · Cited by 182
“These models were respectively the lognormal clock model of Thorne and colleagues (Thorne et al., 1998; Thorne and Kishino, 2002), and the uncorrelated gamma multipliers model of Lepage et al.”
MethodTime Flies, a New Molecular Time-Scale for Brachyceran Fly Evolution Without a Clock
Wiegmann, B. M., Yeates, D. K., Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2003) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150390250965 · Cited by 183
Self-citationPhylogenetic relationships and divergence times among New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates).
Opazo, J. C., Wildman, D. E., Prychitko, T., Johnson, R. M., & Goodman, M. (2006) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.015 · Cited by 181
“The MULTIDIVTIME program was used to estimate divergence times using both variance – covariance matrices .”
MethodGalewski, T., Mauffrey, J.-F., Leite, Y. L. R., Patton, J. L., & Douzery, E. (2005) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.015 · Cited by 182
“We applied a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock approach on amino acids for the caviomorph vWF data set via DIVTIME version 5b (Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne et al., 1998).”
MethodA multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny of the siphonous green algae
Verbruggen, H., Ashworth, M. P., LoDuca, S. T., Vlaeminck, C., Cocquyt, E., Sauvage, T., Zechman, F. W., Littler, D. S., Littler, M. M., & Leliaert, F. (2008) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.018 · Cited by 177
“The assumption of the molecular clock was relaxed by allowing rates of molecular evolution to vary along the tree according to a Brownian motion model (Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne et al., 1998).”
MethodMitochondrial Phylogenetics and Evolution of Mysticete Whales
Sasaki, T., Nikaido, M., Hamilton, H., Goto, M., Kato, H., Kanda, N., Pastene, L. A., Cao, Y., Fordyce, R. E., Hasegawa, M., et al. (2005) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150590905939 · Cited by 179
“Therefore, we used Thorne and Kishino’ s method (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001), which takes account of the violation of the clock in estimating divergence times.”
MethodNear, T. J., & Sanderson, M. J. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1523 · Cited by 180
“The 105 Myr ago calibration date was treated as the mean of a prior probability distribution, which was then used in a Bayesian analysis of divergence times (Thorne et al. 1998).”
Paradis, E. (2013) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.008 · Cited by 177
“At the same time, Bayesian methods were developed with similar modeling assumptions though with different fitting approaches (e.g., Thorne et al., 1998; Thorne and Kishino, 2002).”
MethodA model with many small shifts for estimating species-specific diversification rates
Maliet, O., Hartig, F., & Morlon, H. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0908-0 · Cited by 183
Marshall, D. C., Simon, C., & Buckley, T. R. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150601087641 · Cited by 170
“ally accepted that best-fitting models that accommodate these biases are necessary for molecular dating (Arbogast et al, 2002; Welch and Bromham, 2005). Yang and Yo der (2003) examined the effects of partitioning protein coding genes by codon position and estimating dates from these multiple partitions.”
BackgroundMethodFoster, C. S. P., Sauquet, H., van der Merwe, M. M., McPherson, H., Rossetto, M., & Ho, S. Y. W. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw086 · Cited by 172
Dating tips for divergence time estimation
O’Reilly, J. E., dos Reis, M., & Donoghue, P. C. J. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.08.001 · Cited by 159
“Molecular clock methodology has been developed to accommodate tree-wide substitution rate heterogeneity [3–6], and precision has increased with the availability of genome-scale datasets (i.”
BackgroundXiang, Q., & Soltis, P. S. (2001) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/323332 · Cited by 170
“…estimating divergence times without a molecular clock (i.e., without requiring a clocklike sequence evolution among lineages) (e.g., Sanderson 1997; Thorne et al. 1998; Huelsenbeck et al. 2000; and Kishino et al. 2001) would be particularly valuable tools for providing estimates of divergence…”
MethodDating Lineages: Molecular and Paleontological Approaches to the Temporal Framework of Clades
Magallón, S. (2004) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/383336 · Cited by 165
“In a thorough application of model selection, Uyenoyama (1995) investigated the timing of change of function of alleles to produce sporophytic self-incompatibility in Brassica and relatives.”
BackgroundMethodInference of Viral Evolutionary Rates from Molecular Sequences
DRUMMON, A., Pybus, O. G., & Rambaut, A. (2003) · Advances in Parasitology/Advances in parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(03)54008-8 · Cited by 170
“A more satisfactory solution to this problem is the recent development of ‘relaxed clock’ models of substitution (Thorne et al., 1998; Huelsenbeck et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInverse Relationship Between Evolutionary Rate and Age of Mammalian Genes
Albà, M. M., & Castresana, J. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi045 · Cited by 169
“…residues are considered, it is also evident that different parts of the tree have different substitution rates (Gillespie 1991; Sanderson 1997; Thorne, Kishino, and Painter 1998; Huelsenbeck, Larget, and Swofford 2000; Aris-Brosou and Yang 2002; Sanderson 2002; Aris-Brosou and Yang 2003; Seo,…”
BackgroundBATS, CLOCKS, AND ROCKS: DIVERSIFICATION PATTERNS IN CHIROPTERA
Jones, K. E., Bininda‐Emonds, O. R. P., & Gittleman, J. L. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00932.x · Cited by 167
“For example, the higher-level divergence times are very consistent with Teeling et al.’s (2005) estimates from 13 nuclear genes using Bayesian dating methods (Thorne et al. 1998; Kishino et al. 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAge and biogeography of major clades in sturgeons and paddlefishes (Pisces: Acipenseriformes)
Peng, Z., Ludwig, A., Wang, D., Diogo, R., Wei, Q., & He, S. (2006) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.008 · Cited by 164
“Divergence times were determined using a Bayesian approach that incorporates variation of rates of evolution among genes and among lineages (Thorne et al., 1998; Thorne and Kishino, 2002), which were estimated with MULTIDIVTIME program (available from J.”
MethodCalibrating the Tree of Life: fossils, molecules and evolutionary timescales
Forest, F. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcp192 · Cited by 182
“…third category; these are non-parametric rate smoothing (NPRS; Sanderson, 1997), penalized likelihood (PL; Sanderson, 2002), the Bayesian method implemented in the Multidivtime package (Thorne et al., 1998) and Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees (BEAST; Drummond and Rambaut, 2007).”
MethodMolecular Dating, Evolutionary Rates, and the Age of the Grasses
Christin, P., Spriggs, E. L., Osborne, C. P., Strömberg, C. A. E., Salamin, N., & Edwards, E. J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt072 · Cited by 167
Estimating the age of the polydnavirus/braconid wasp symbiosis
Whitfield, J. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.112067199 · Cited by 162
Mansion, G., Rosenbaum, G., Schoenenberger, N., Bacchetta, G., Rosselló, J. A., & Conti, E. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802044029 · Cited by 164
“Output branch lengths were then used as priors in MCMC searches in Multidivtime (Thorne and Kishino, 2002), to find the most likely model of rate change given the sequence data, the chosen topology, node constraints, and a Brownian motion parameter nu that determines the permitted rate change between an ancestral and…”
MethodInfluentialA BAYESIAN FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COSPECIATION
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Rannala, B. H., & Larget, B. R. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00039.x · Cited by 164
Aris-Brosou, S. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg226 · Cited by 164
“The algorithm was described in Aris-Brosou and Yang (2002) and is similar to that of Thorne, Kishino, and Painter (1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Likelihood Framework for Estimating Phylogeographic History on a Continuous Landscape
Lemmon, A. R., & Lemmon, E. M. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802304761 · Cited by 166
“Estimation of this parameter requires that the temporal scale of the assumed chronogram is known, either through use of external calibrations (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002; Sanderson, 2002, 2003; Drummond et al., 2006; Drummond and Rambaut, 2007), molecular clock estimates (Zucke…”
BackgroundMethodANGIOSPERM DIVERGENCE TIMES: THE EFFECT OF GENES, CODON POSITIONS, AND TIME CONSTRAINTS
Magallón, S., & Sanderson, M. J. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/04-565.1 · Cited by 175
Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis
Åkerborg, Ö., Sennblad, B., Arvestad, L., & Lagergren, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806251106 · Cited by 161
“18 and models used to obtain a relaxed molecular clock (i.e., substitution rates vary over the tree) (28, 29).”
MethodKoepfli, K., Gompper, M. E., Eizirik, E., Ho, C.-C., Linden, L., Maldonado, J. E., & Wayne, R. K. (2006) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.003 · Cited by 161
“Divergence time estimates were performed using the well-supported optimal topology obtained with the molecular supermatrix (see Section 3), using the Relaxed Molecular Clock approach developed by Thorne et al. (1998) and Kishino et al. (2001).”
MethodMeredith, R. W., Gatesy, J., Murphy, W. J., Ryder, O. A., & Springer, M. S. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000634 · Cited by 162
“The relaxed molecular clock method implemented in Multidivtime (version 9-25-03) [64–66] was used to estimate divergence”
MethodPhylogeny and systematics of Diptera: Two decades of progress and prospects*
Yeates, D. K., Wiegmann, B. M., Courtney, G. W., Meier, R., Lambkin, C. L., & Pape, T. (2007) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.27 · Cited by 158
“…times have employed both traditional molecular clock assumptions (Beverly and Wilson 1984, Powell 1997, Gaunt and Miles 2002, Tamura et al. 2004), and Bayesian methods that allow evolutionary rates to vary across the phylogeny (Thorne et al. 1998, Wiegmann et al. 2003, Winterton et al 2007).”
Crottini, A., Madsen, O., Poux, C., Strauß, A., Vieites, D. R., & Vences, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112487109 · Cited by 158
Taxon Sampling Affects Inferences of Macroevolutionary Processes from Phylogenetic Trees
Heath, T. A., Zwickl, D. J., Kim, J., & Hillis, D. M. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701884640 · Cited by 157
“…rates is analogous to probabilistic models of the rate of molecular evolution implemented in methods used to estimate divergence times (e.g., Thorne et al., 1998; Huelsenbeck et al., 2000; Kishino et al., 2001). at U niversity of C onnecticut on A pril 29,…”
MethodThe Archean origin of oxygenic photosynthesis and extant cyanobacterial lineages
Fournier, G. P., Moore, K. R., Rangel, L. T., Payette, J. G., Momper, L., & Bosak, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0675 · Cited by 162
The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times
Duchêne, S., Lanfear, R., & Ho, S. Y. W. (2014) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.032 · Cited by 156
Crayn, D. M., Costion, C. M., & Harrington, M. G. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12405 · Cited by 156
Zheng, Y., Peng, R., Kuro‐o, M., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr072 · Cited by 161
Bayesian molecular dating: opening up the black box
Bromham, L. D., Duchêne, S., Hua, X., Ritchie, A. M., Duchêne, D. A., & Ho, S. Y. W. (2017) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12390 · Cited by 163
“The rates can be assumed to be independently and identically distributed, as in uncorrelated relaxed clocks (e.g. Drummond et al., 2006), or related between neighbouring branches, as in autocorrelated relaxed clocks (e.g. Thorne et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialNear, T. J., Bolnick, D. I., & Wainwright, P. C. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01825.x · Cited by 156
“These analyses are not meant to endorse penalized likelihood over other commonly used strategies such as Bayesian methods to estimate divergence times from molecular phylogenies (Thorne et al. 1998); however, penalized likelihood appears to be the most appropriate method to assess the veracity of individual calibratio…”
MethodInfluentialAdkins, R. M., Walton, A. H., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00304-4 · Cited by 157
Range Size: Disentangling Current Traits and Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Factors
Böhning‐Gaese, K., Caprano, T., van Ewijk, K. Y., & Veith, M. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/501078 · Cited by 155
“We therefore applied Bayesian molecular dating (Thorne et al. 1998) to species splits.”
MethodAzuma, Y., Kumazawa, Y., Miya, M. U., Mabuchi, K., & Nishida, M. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-215 · Cited by 155
“For the divergence time estimation, multidistribute program [41] was used by assuming a topological relationship thus obtained, but without assuming the molecular clock (i.”
MethodMagallón, S. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq027 · Cited by 154
“html), a relaxed clock in which the rate of molecular evolution is modeled through time, assuming that different genes may have different substitution rates but share divergence times (Thorne et al. 1998; Kishino et al. 2001; Thorne and Kishino 2002).”
BackgroundInferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide
Rieux, A., & Balloux, F. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13586 · Cited by 155
Challenges in Species Tree Estimation Under the Multispecies Coalescent Model
Xu, B., & Yang, Z. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.190173 · Cited by 147
Andreasen, K., & Baldwin, B. G. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003894 · Cited by 153
Douady, C. J., Catzeflis, F. M., Raman, J., Springer, M. S., & Stanhope, M. J. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0832467100 · Cited by 156
Mesozoic origin for West Indian insectivores
Roca, A. L., Bar‐Gal, G. K., Eizirik, E., Helgen, K. M., María, R., Springer, M. S., O’Brien, S. J., & Murphy, W. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02597 · Cited by 155
“as minimum and maximum calibration points to estimate, using the method of Thorne–Kishin”
MethodThe unbearable uncertainty of Bayesian divergence time estimation
DOS REIS, M., & YANG, Z. (2013) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00236.x · Cited by 140
“The field has moved a long way since then, and several sophisticated computer programs that implement Bayesian estimation of divergence times have been developed, such as MULTIDIVTIME (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001), BEAST (Drummond & Rambaut, 2007), MrBAYES (Ronquist et al., 2012b), MCMCTREE (Yang, 2007),…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModel Averaging and Bayes Factor Calculation of Relaxed Molecular Clocks in Bayesian Phylogenetics
Li, W. L. S., & Drummond, A. J. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr232 · Cited by 147
“An obvious extension to our model-averaging technique would be to allow coparameterization of both uncorrelated relaxed clocks and autocorrelated relaxed clocks (Thorne et al. 1998; Aris-Brosou and Yang 2002).”
BackgroundMethodVicariant Origin of Malagasy Reptiles Supports Late Cretaceous Antarctic Land Bridge
Noonan, B. P., & Chippindale, P. T. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/509052 · Cited by 148
“Cretaceous Vicariance of Gondwanan Reptiles Our results raise obvious questions regarding the absence of extant B, P, and I from India and Australia.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTiming and Tempo of Early and Successive Adaptive Radiations in Macaronesia
Kim, S., McGowen, M. R., Lubinsky, P., Barber, J. C., Mort, M. E., & Santos‐Guerra, A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002139 · Cited by 148
“Root Age MRCA Dispersal Into Dispersal Into Back Dispersal Rate of Diversification Sonchus 13.20365.51 8.47565.50 2.71762.15 0.73960.84 NA 0.32339 (0.21472–0.65815) Echium 7.93163.58 3.73362.21 0.28260.36 1.32861.05 NA 0.6168 (0.387–1.51228) Aeonium alliance 18.83361.81 15.26361.95 8.4761.92, 7.1361.89 1.28160.92 2.95…”
MethodInfluentialTopological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models
Bruno, W., & Halpern, A. L. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026137 · Cited by 147
“This suggests the importance of research into models that only mildly violate the molecular clock (Thorne, Kishino, and Painter 1998).”
BackgroundSingle-Copy Nuclear Genes Recover Cretaceous-Age Divergences in Bees
Danforth, B. N., Brady, S. G., Sipes, S. D., & Pearson, A. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490423737 · Cited by 147
“We then estimated branch lengths and divergence dates on this topology using computer programs (ESTBRANCHES and MULTIDIVTIME) that implement the Bayesian divergence dating method developed by Thorne and coworkers (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002).”
MethodTime scale of eutherian evolution estimated without assuming a constant rate of molecular evolution.
Hasegawa, M., Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2003) · Genes & Genetic Systems · doi:10.1266/ggs.78.267 · Cited by 145
“In other respects, the approaches are quite similar and we use Thorne et al.’s approach (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002) here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPhylogeny and Evolutionary History of the Ground Squirrels (Rodentia: Marmotinae)
Harrison, R. G., Bogdanowicz, S., Hoffmann, R., Yensen, E., & Sherman, P. W. (2003) · Journal of mammalian evolution · doi:10.1023/b:jomm.0000015105.96065.f0 · Cited by 159
A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes
Meredith, R. W., Westerman, M., Case, J. A., & Springer, M. S. (2007) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6 · Cited by 151
“Woodburne et al. (2003) used the estbranches and divtime5b programs of Thorne et al. (1998) and Kishino et al. (2001) with hard constraints and amino acid sequences for two proteins (BRCA1 and IGF2) and obtained point estimates of 182–190 Ma for the split between marsupials and placentals.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTolley, K. A., Burger, M., Turner, A. A., & Matthee, C. A. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02836.x · Cited by 145
PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE ANTILLES AND ORIGIN OF WEST INDIAN TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATES 1
Hedges, S. B. (2006) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[231:potaao]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 145
Determination of Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity in Mammals
Nabholz, B., Mauffrey, J.-F., Bazin, É., Galtier, N., & Glémin, S. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.073346 · Cited by 145
“The Bayesian approach in Multidivtime simultaneously estimates the rate and age for each node of a given tree, assuming a prior distribution of evolutionary rates along branches, and, option- ally, constraints on the age of certain internal nodes.”
MethodPerini, F. A., Russo, C., & Schrago, C. G. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01901.x · Cited by 144
“For the sake of comparison, node ages were also estimated with the correlated model of Thorne & Kishino (2002) available in the Multidistribute package (see also Thorne et al., 1998).”
MethodDating the Dipsacales: comparing models, genes, and evolutionary implications
Bell, C. D., & Donoghue, M. J. (2005) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.92.2.284 · Cited by 144
“Bayesian relaxed clock using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)— Bayesian methods (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002) that relax a strict molecular clock were also used to estimate divergence times using MULTIDIVTIME (available from J. Thorne, North Carolina State…”
Steiper, M. E., & Seiffert, E. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119506109 · Cited by 143
Pilgrim, E. M., von Dohlen, C. D., & Pitts, J. P. (2008) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00340.x · Cited by 148
“In addition, the geological timing and ecological context of this diversification can be estimated with aculeate fossil-calibrated molecular dating methods (Thorne et al. 1998; Kishino et al. 2001; Thorne & Kishino 2002; Sanderson 2003; Rutschmann et al. 2007); this work is in progress.”
MethodBrady, S. G. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1137809100 · Cited by 142
Adalsteinsson, S. A., Branch, W. R., Trape, S., Vitt, L. J., & Hedges, S. B. (2009) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2244.1.1 · Cited by 146
“determine model parameters, and in estbranches (Thorne et al. 1998) to estimate branch lengths.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRIBAS, C. C., Moyle, R. G., Miyaki, C. Y., & Cracraft, J. L. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0613 · Cited by 143
“The parametric method proposed by Thorne et al. (1998) uses a probabilistic model based on priors to describe the change in evolutionary rates over time and uses the Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure to derive the posterior distribution of rates and times.”
MethodChristin, P., Sage, T. L., Edwards, E. J., Ogburn, R. M., Khoshravesh, R., & Sage, R. F. (2010) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01168.x · Cited by 141
Rutschmann, F., Eriksson, T., Salim, K. A., & Conti, E. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701491156 · Cited by 141
“More specifically, the rate smoothing methods employed in our dating analyses, based on both Bayesian (Thorne et al., 1998) and penalized likelihood (Sanderson, 2002) approaches, allow rates to change between ancestraldescendant branches, thus creating estimation errors that depend on the number of nodes involved in t…”
MethodA New Malaria Agent in African Hominids
Ollomo, B., Durand, P., Prugnolle, F., Douzery, E., Arnathau, C., Nkoghe, D., Leroy, E. M., & François Renaud, A. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000446 · Cited by 140
“normal rate-autocorrelated model [37] was adopted to relax the molecular clock hypothesis as it has been shown to reasonably fit”
MethodAncient Mitogenomes Reveal the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths
Delsuc, F., Kuch, M., Gibb, G. C., Karpinski, E., Hackenberger, D., Szpak, P., Martínez, J. G., Mead, J. I., McDonald, H. G., MacPhee, R. D. E., et al. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.043 · Cited by 149
The role of molecular genetics in sculpting the future of integrative biogeography
Riddle, B. R., Dawson, M. N., Hadly, E. A., Hafner, D. J., Hickerson, M. J., Mantooth, S. J., & Yoder, A. D. (2008) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133308093822 · Cited by 139
“Bayesian (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002; Yang and Rannala, 2006) and likelihood (Yang and Yoder, 2003; Yang, 2004) methods have been developed and modified such that they can account for violations of the molecular clock and for uncertainties of the fossil record by incorporating…”
MethodMulcahy, D. G., Noonan, B. P., Moss, T. J., Townsend, T. M., Reeder, T. W., Sites, J. W., & Wiens, J. J. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.018 · Cited by 139
The Lake Tanganyika cichlid species assemblage: recent advances in molecular phylogenetics
Koblmüller, S., Sefc, K. M., & Sturmbauer, C. (2008) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9552-4 · Cited by 137
“Especially, those methods that relax the assumption of a molecular clock (e.g., Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Sanderson, 2002; Britton, 2005) and combine molecular data with time constraints (upper and lower bounds), usually derived from fossils or geological data, have become increasingly popular.”
MethodBarraclough, T. G., & Vogler, A. P. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003993 · Cited by 136
“Character-based methods are available for correcting rate variation among lineages (Thorne, Kishino, and Painter 1998; Huelsenbeck, Larget, and Swofford 2000), but implementation is still difficult for large matrices.”
MethodA Dated Phylogeny of Marsupials Using a Molecular Supermatrix and Multiple Fossil Constraints
Beck, R. M. D. (2008) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/06-mamm-a-437.1 · Cited by 138
“Other Multidivtime parameters were calculated as follows (following Rutschmann 2005): rtrate (mean of prior distribution for the rate at the root node)¼X/rttm, where X is the median amount of evolution from the root to tips; rtratesd (standard deviation of rtrtate) ¼ 0.5 rtrate; brownmean (mean of the prior distributi…”
MethodInfluentialPhylogeny and Biogeography of the Core Babblers (Aves: Timaliidae)
Moyle, R. G., Andersen, M. J., Oliveros, C. H., Steinheimer, F. D., & Reddy, S. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys027 · Cited by 135
“We used the lognormal model (Thorne et al. 1998) to describe the change of rates over time and applied a broad gamma-distributed prior to the root of the tree (mean 40, standard deviation 20).”
MethodChiou, K. L., Pozzi, L., Alfaro, J. W. L., & Fiore, A. D. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.03.025 · Cited by 135
“In contrast to the study of Hodgson et al. (2009), however, two independent methods were employed to estimate divergence dates: the autocorrelated Bayesian method of Thorne and Kishino (Thorne et al., 1998; Thorne and Kishino, 2002) as implemented with multidivtime from the MULTIDISTRIBUTE package and the uncorrelated…”
MethodInfluentialNakano, T., & Ozawa, T. (2007) · Journal of Molluscan Studies · doi:10.1093/mollus/eym001 · Cited by 135
Testing alternative vicariance scenarios in Western Mediterranean discoglossid frogs
Fromhage, L., Vences, M., & Veith, M. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2003.07.009 · Cited by 135
“More recently, methods have been developed in a framework of likelihood and Bayesian theory that aim to relax the assumptionof rate constancybymodeling the evolutionof rates between multiple calibration points (Rambaut and Bromham, 1998; Sanderson, 1997; Thorne et al., 1998).”
MethodTurtle phylogeny: insights from a novel nuclear intron
Fujita, M. K., Engstrom, T. N., Starkey, D. E., & Shaffer, H. B. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.016 · Cited by 135
“Methods exist that allow the dating of divergence times despite unclock-like evolution (Kishino et al., 2001; Sanderson, 1997, 2002; Thorne et al., 1998), and our laboratory is currently investigating molecular clock calibrations for turtles using the R35 intron.”
BackgroundNikaido, M., Kawai, K., Cao, Y., Harada, M., Tomita, S., Okada, N., & Hasegawa, M. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s002390010241 · Cited by 135
“The Bayesian method of Thorne et al. (1998) is useful for this purpose, as shown by Nikaido et al. (2000) and Cao et al. (2000), who applied this method to mammalian mt-proteins.”
MethodPereira, S. L., Johnson, K. P., Clayton, D. H., & Baker, A. J. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701549672 · Cited by 134
Efficient Bayesian inference under the structured coalescent
Vaughan, T. G., Kühnert, D., Popinga, A., Welch, D., & Drummond, A. J. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu201 · Cited by 126
“…size histories and other population genetic parameters of interest to be inferred alongside increasingly sophisticated phylogenetic tree reconstructions, which, for example, do away with the assumption of a strict molecular clock (Drummond et al., 2006; Sanderson, 2002; Thorne et al., 1998).”
BackgroundArvestad, L., Berglund, A.-C., Lagergren, J., & Sennblad, B. (2004) · Research in Computational Molecular Biology · doi:10.1145/974614.974657 · Cited by 132
“GTR [10, 12] or evolving rates [15], can easily be incorporated in our method; the model parameters would then be estimated in the MCMC-analysis.”
MethodJeyaprakash, A., & Hoy, M. A. (2008) · Experimental and Applied Acarology · doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9203-5 · Cited by 133
“Rate variations occur when distantly-related taxa are used to construct phylogenetic trees, but two recent software programs, multidivtime ( Thorne et al. 1998 ) and r8s (Sanderson 2003), were developed to account for these rate variations and allow calculations of divergence times with more confidence.”
MethodInfluentialThe molecular population genetics of HIV-1 group O.
Lemey, P., Pybus, O. G., Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Robertson, D. L., Roques, P., Worobey, M., & Vandamme, A.-M. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.026666 · Cited by 131
“For these data sets, divergence dates were also estimatedHIV-1 group O: A Bayesian coalescent framework was used for the joint estimation of population parameters, under a relaxed molecular clock using the program MULTIDIVTIME (Thorne et al. 1998; Thorne andsubstitution parameters, dates of divergence, and tree topolo…”
MethodInfluentialField, D. J., Gauthier, J. A., King, B. L., Pisani, D., Lyson, T. R., & Peterson, K. J. (2014) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/ede.12081 · Cited by 134
“2012), as turtles show both slow rates of miRNA evolution (Thorne et al. 1998) (ESM File”
BackgroundResultTolley, K. A., Chase, B., & Forest, F. (2008) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01889.x · Cited by 131
“Maximum likelihood estimates of the branch lengths and their variance–covariance matrix were then estimated by the program Estbranches for each data set.”
MethodInfluentialRATES OF MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION ARE CORRELATED WITH SPECIES RICHNESS IN SALAMANDERS
Rabosky, D. L., & Adams, D. C. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01557.x · Cited by 131
“This is similar to the model used to describe phylogenetic autocorrelation of molecular evolutionary rates along the branches of a phylogenetic tree (Thorne et al. 1998; Drummond et al. 2006).”
MethodHuchon, D., Catzeflis, F. M., & Douzery, E. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1014 · Cited by 130
“…that molecular date estimates will be improved by the choice of several cross-validated calibration points, by an increase in the number and accuracy of palaeontological data, and by development of new dating methods, allowing variation of evolutionary rates (Sanderson 1997; Thorne et al. 1998).”
BackgroundTavares, E. S., Baker, A. J., Pereira, S. L., & Miyaki, C. Y. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600697390 · Cited by 129
“It also uses the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to derive the posterior distribution of rates (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001) and times, and in a multigene data set allows each gene to be analyzed with an independent model (Thorne and Kishino, 2002).”
MethodDating the arthropod tree based on large-scale transcriptome data
Rehm, P., Borner, J., Meusemann, K., von Reumont, B. M., Simon, S., Hadrys, H., Misof, B., & Burmester, T. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.003 · Cited by 121
“Three relaxed clock models, the log–normal autocorrelated clock model (LOG) (Thorne et al., 1998), the ‘CIR’ process (CIR) (Cox et al., 1985; see also Lepage et al., 2006) and uncorrelated gamma multipliers (UGM) (Drummond et al., 2006), were used under a uniform prior on divergence times for…”
MethodDornburg, A., Brandley, M. C., McGowen, M. R., & Near, T. J. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr228 · Cited by 128
“A common framework of many of these models is the assumption that molecular rates are autocorrelated, whereby the rates in daughter lineages are inherited from parent branches (e.g., Sanderson 1997; Thorne et al. 1998; Aris-Brosou and Yang 2002; Drummond and Suchard 2010).”
BackgroundPhylogenetic analysis using lévy processes: finding jumps in the evolution of continuous traits
Landis, M. J., Schraiber, J. G., & Liang, M. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys086 · Cited by 127
“Thismethod is similar in spirit to models of rate shifts in molecular evolution (Thorne et al. 1998; Huelsenbeck et al. 2000; Drummond and Suchard 2010).”
Taking Variation of Evolutionary Rates Between Sites into Account in Inferring Phylogenies
Felsenstein, J. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s002390010234 · Cited by 127
“Thorne et al. (1998) have used Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to integrate likelihoods over a phylogeny on which branch lengths can vary among branches, but in the context of an approximate clock.”
MethodThe first mistletoes: Origins of aerial parasitism in Santalales
Vidal‐Russell, R., & Nickrent, D. L. (2008) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.016 · Cited by 128
“The BRMC method was implemented utilizing the software MULTIDIVTIME (Thorne et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodYang, Z.-Y., Ran, J., & Wang, X. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.004 · Cited by 127
“The Bayesian approach was performed with PAML/multidivtime (Thorne et al., 1998; Yang, 2007), following the step-by-step manual, version 1.”
MethodInfluentialFrontiers of Statistical Decision Making and Bayesian Analysis
Chen, M., Dey, D., Müller, P., Sun, D., & Ye, K. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6944-6 · Cited by 158
A phylogeny of Diprotodontia (Marsupialia) based on sequences for five nuclear genes
Meredith, R. W., Westerman, M., & Springer, M. S. (2009) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.009 · Cited by 125
“Multidivtime requires a rooted tree topology, only allows for fixed minimum and maximum constraints, assumes autocorrelated rates of molecular evolution among lineages, and estimates branch lengths using the program estbranches (Thorne et al., 1998; Kishino et al., 2001; Thorne and Kishino, 2002).”
MethodProbabilistic Graphical Model Representation in Phylogenetics
Höhna, S., Heath, T. A., Boussau, B., Landis, M. J., Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2014) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu039 · Cited by 130
“ces. It may be used in a simple model where all characters evolve homogeneously or it may be extended by, e.g., using site-specic rate-multipliers (Yang 1994; 1996), branch-specic rate-multipliers (Thorne et al. 1998), branch-specic substitution rate matrices (Yang and Roberts 1995; Galtier and Gouy 1998) and site-spe…”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1647-1657
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2051296828
- Cited by
- 1,317
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 63
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01-GM45344, P01GM045344)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- molecular evolution rate, rate heterogeneity, Bayesian model, divergence time estimation, nucleotide substitution models, rbcL, protein sequences, molecular clock
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Plant Proteins, Plants, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Time, Models, Statistical, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review