The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new method that simultaneously aligns and reconstructs ancestral sequences for any number of homologous sequences, when the phylogeny is given.
Open accessAbstract
Among the fundamental problems in molecular evolution and in the analysis of homologous sequences are alignment, phylogeny reconstruction, and the reconstruction of ancestral sequences. This paper presents a fast, combined solution to these problems. The new algorithm gives an approximation to the minimal history in terms of a distance function on sequences. The distance function on sequences is a minimal weighted path length constructed from substitutions and insertions-deletions of segments of any length. Substitutions are weighted with an arbitrary metric on the set of nucleotides or amino acids, and indels are weighted with a gap penalty function of the form gk = a + (bxk), where k is the length of the indel and a and b are two positive numbers. A novel feature is the introduction of the concept of sequence graphs and a generalization of the traditional dynamic sequence comparison algorithm to the comparison of sequence graphs. Sequence graphs ease several computational problems. They are used to represent large sets of sequences that can then be compared simultaneously. Furthermore, they allow the handling of multiple, equally good, alignments, where previous methods were forced to make arbitrary choices. A program written in C implemented this method; it was tested first on 22 5S RNA sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Cited by
Aligning Multiple Genomic Sequences With the Threaded Blockset Aligner
Blanchette, M., Kent, W. J., Riemer, C., Elnitski, L., Smit, A. F. A., Roskin, K. M., Baertsch, R., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Green, E. D., et al. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1933104 · Cited by 1,452
On the Complexity of Multiple Sequence Alignment
WANG, L., & JIANG, T. (1994) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.1994.1.337 · Cited by 934
An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions
Löytynoja, A., & Goldman, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409137102 · Cited by 907
Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?
Wheeler, W. (1996) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00189.x · Cited by 638
Eizenga, J. M., Novak, A. M., Sibbesen, J. A., Heumos, S., Ghaffaari, A., Hickey, G., Chang, X., Seaman, J. D., Rounthwaite, R., Ebler, J., et al. (2020) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-120219-080406 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 649-68
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2254458779
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new method that simultaneously aligns and reconstructs ancestral sequences for any number of homologous sequences, when the phylogeny is given. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040577
- The paper
- A new method that simultaneously aligns and reconstructs ancestral sequences for any number of homologous sequences, when the phylogeny is given. (1989). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.