Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implications for Cosmic Reionization from the Optical Afterglow Spectrum of the Gamma-Ray Burst 050904 at z = 6.3

Open access
Totani, Tomonori, Kawai, Nobuyuki, Kosugi, George, Aoki, Kentaro, Yamada, Toru, Iye, Masanori, Ohta, Kouji, Hattori, Takashi·2006·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

Abstract

The gamma-ray burst (GRB) 050904 at $z = 6.3$ provides the first opportunity to probe the intergalactic medium (IGM) by GRBs at the epoch of reionization. Here, we present a spectral modeling analysis of the optical afterglow spectrum taken by the Subaru Telescope, aiming to constrain the reionization history. The spectrum shows a clear damping wing at wavelengths redward of the Lyman break, and the wing shape can be fitted either by a damped Ly$\alpha$ system with a column density of $\log [N_{\mathrm{H {I}}} \,(\mathrm{cm}^{-2})] \sim 21.6$ at a redshift close to the detected metal absorption lines ($z_{\mathrm{metal}} = 6.295$), or by almost neutral IGM extending to a slightly higher redshift of $z_{\mathrm{IGM,u}} \sim 6.36$. In the latter case, the difference between the two redshifts may be explained by the acceleration of metal absorbing shells in the activities of the GRB or its progenitor. However, we exclude this possibility by using the light transmission feature around the Ly$\beta$ resonance, leading to a firm upper limit of $z_{\mathrm{IGM,u}} \leq 6.314$. We then show evidence that the IGM was already largely ionized at $z = 6.3$ with the best-fit neutral fraction of IGM, $x_{\mathrm{H {I}}} \; (\equiv n_{\mathrm{H {I}}} / n_{\mathrm{H}}) = 0.00$, and upper limits of $x_{\mathrm{H {I}}} < 0.17$ and 0.60 at 68% and 95% confidence levels, respectively. This is the first direct and quantitative upper limit on $x_{\mathrm{H {I}}}$ at $z \gt 6$. Various systematic uncertainties are examined, but none of them appears large enough to change our conclusion. To get further information on the reionization, it is important to increase the sample size of $z \gtrsim 6$ GRBs, in order to find GRBs with low column densities ($\log N_{\mathrm{H {I}}} \lesssim 20$) within their host galaxies and to make statistical studies of Ly$\alpha$ line emission from host galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pasj/58.3.485

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Totani, T., Kawai, N., Kosugi, G., Aoki, K., Yamada, T., Iye, M., Ohta, K., & Hattori, T.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
Published
2006-06-25
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
485-498
ISSN
  • 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-051X
OpenAlex
W2022000830
Cited by
335
References
3
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications for Cosmic Reionization from the Optical Afterglow Spectrum of the Gamma-Ray Burst 050904 at z = 6.3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pasj/58.3.485
The paper
Totani, T., Kawai, N., Kosugi, G., Aoki, K., Yamada, T., Iye, M., Ohta, K., & Hattori, T. (2006). Implications for Cosmic Reionization from the Optical Afterglow Spectrum of the Gamma-Ray Burst 050904 at z = 6.3. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/58.3.485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.