Time Variability of the Neutral Iron Lines from the Sagittarius B2 Region and Its Implication of a Past Outburst of Sagittarius A$^\ast$
Abstract
We investigated long-term X-ray behavior from the Sgr B2 complex using archival data of the X-ray satellites Suzaku, XMM-Newton, Chandra, and ASCA. The observed region of the Sgr B2 complex included two prominent spots in the FeI K$\alpha$ line at 6.40 keV, a giant molecular cloud, M0.66$-$0.02, known as the “Sgr B2 cloud” and an unusual X-ray source, G0.570$-$0.018. Although these 6.40 keV spots have spatial extensions of a few parsec scale, the morphology and flux of the 6.40 keV line has been time variable for 10 years, in contrast to the constant flux of the Fe XXV K$\alpha$ line at 6.67 keV in the Galactic diffuse X-ray emission. This time variation is mostly due to M0.66$-$0.02; the 6.40 keV line flux declined in 2001, and decreased to 60% in the time span 1994–2005. The other spot, G0.570$-$0.018, is found to be conspicuous only in the Chandra observation in 2000. From the long-term time variability ($\sim$10 years) of the Sgr B2 complex, we infer that the Galactic Center black hole Sgr A$^\ast$ was X-ray bright in the past 300 years, and exhibited a time variability with a period of a few years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observations of fluorescent Fe Kα line (at ≈6.4 keV) in several molecular clouds around Sgr A* indicate an X-ray luminosity LX~10^39 erg/s (mechanical luminosity 10^41-42 erg/s).
“Observations of fluorescent Fe K α line (at ≈ 6 . 4 keV) in several molecular clouds (including at Sgr B2 and Sgr C cloud complexes) around Sgr A ∗ indicates an X-ray luminosity of LX ∼ 10 39 erg s -1 (mechanical luminosity of 10 41 -42 erg s -1 ) (Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Inui et al. 2009
The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints.
“The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints (section 3.3; Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Inui et al. 2009
Cites
Discovery of Variable Iron Fluorescence from Reflection Nebulae in the Galactic Center
Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Brandt, W. N., Park, S., & Morris, M. R. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/512236 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A similar time variability has also been reported for the other cloud near Sgr A by Muno et al. (2007) and Koyama et al. (2009), which are the time variabilities of a few years span.”
BackgroundInfluentialMurakami, H., Koyama, K., Tsujimoto, M., Maeda, Y., & Sakano, M. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/319737 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The <i>XMM–Newton</i> view of the central degrees of the Milky Way
Ponti, G., Morris, M. R., Terrier, R., Haberl, F., Sturm, R., Clavel, M., Soldi, S., Goldwurm, A., Predehl, P., Nandra, K., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1331 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Echoes of multiple outbursts of Sagittarius A<sup><i>⋆</i></sup>revealed by<i>Chandra</i>
Clavel, M., Terrier, R., Goldwurm, A., Morris, M. R., Ponti, G., Soldi, S., & Trap, G. (2013) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321667 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“The strong variability of the 6.4 keV emission, detected in both Sgr B2 (Inui et al. 2009; Terrier et al. 2010) and the Sgr A region (Ponti et al. 2010; Capelli et al. 2012), proves that an important fraction of the diffuse non-thermal emission is due to reflection.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Inui, T., Koyama, K., Matsumoto, H., & Tsuru, T. G.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Inui, Tatsuya
- Koyama, Katsuji
- Matsumoto, Hironori
- Tsuru, Takeshi Go
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- sp1
- Pages
- S241-S253
- ISSN
- 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2392479107
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- Sagittarius B2, Sgr A*, X-ray variability, Galactic Center black hole, giant molecular clouds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review