Cited by 59Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

ASCA Discovery of Diffuse 6.4 keV Emission near the Sagittarius C Complex: A New X‐Ray Reflection Nebula

Open access
Murakami, Hiroshi, Koyama, Katsuji, Tsujimoto, Masahiro, Maeda, Yoshitomo, Sakano, Masaaki·2001·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present an ASCA discovery of diffuse hard X-ray emission from the Sgr C complex with its peak in the vicinity of the molecular cloud core. The X-ray spectrum is characterized by a strong 6.4 keV line and large absorption. These properties suggest that Sgr C is a new X-ray reflection nebula that emits fluorescent and scattered X-rays via irradiation from an external X-ray source. We found no adequately bright source in the immediate Sgr C vicinity to fully account for the fluorescence. The irradiating source may be the Galactic nucleus Sgr A*, which was brighter in the past than it is now, as is suggested from observations of the first X-ray reflection nebula Sgr B2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/319737

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations of fluorescent Fe Kα line (at ≈6.4 keV) in several molecular clouds around Sgr A* indicate an X-ray luminosity LX~10^39 erg/s (mechanical luminosity 10^41-42 erg/s).

    “Observations of fluorescent Fe K α line (at ≈ 6 . 4 keV) in several molecular clouds (including at Sgr B2 and Sgr C cloud complexes) around Sgr A ∗ indicates an X-ray luminosity of LX ∼ 10 39 erg s -1 (mechanical luminosity of 10 41 -42 erg s -1 ) (Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Murakami et al. 2001

  • The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints.

    “The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints (section 3.3; Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Murakami et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murakami, H., Koyama, K., Tsujimoto, M., Maeda, Y., & Sakano, M.
Affiliations
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2001-03-20
Volume
550
Issue
1
Pages
297-300
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2124572456
Cited by
59
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
X-ray fluorescence, X-ray absorption, molecular clouds, Sgr A*, Sgr B2, ASCA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review