Cited by 79Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Discovery of Variable Iron Fluorescence from Reflection Nebulae in the Galactic Center

Open access
Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Brandt, W. N., Park, S., Morris, M. R.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

On the basis of 3 years of deep observations of the Galactic center with the Chandra X-Ray Observatory , we report the discovery of changes in the intensities and morphologies of two hard X-ray nebulosities. The nebulosities are dominated by fluorescent iron emission and are coincident with molecular clouds. The morphological changes are manifest on parsec scales, which requires that these iron features are scattered X-rays from a 2 or 3 year long outburst of a point source (either Sgr A* or an X-ray binary) with a luminosity of at least 10 37 ergs s -1 . The variability precludes the hypotheses that these nebulae either are produced by keV electrons bombarding molecular clouds or are iron-rich ejecta from supernovae. Moreover, the morphologies of the reflection nebulae implies that the dense regions of the clouds are filamentary, with widths of ≈0.3 pc and lengths of ≈2 pc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/512236

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variation of Fe Kα line intensity across the clouds as well as during repeated observations indicate that Sgr A* is variable on a ~(1-10) yr time-scale.

    “Variation of Fe K α line intensity across the clouds as well as during repeated observations indicate that Sgr A ∗ is variable on a ∼ (1 -10) yr time-scale (Muno et al. 2007; Chuard et al. 2018).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Muno et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Brandt, W. N., Park, S., & Morris, M. R.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-01-31
Volume
656
Issue
2
Pages
L69-L72
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1997735880
Cited by
79
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
reflection nebulae, Galactic Center, X-ray variability, X-ray binaries, molecular clouds, filaments, Chandra X-ray Observatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review