Paediatricians, social media and blogs: Ethical considerations
Open accessAbstract
The use of blogs, Facebook and similar social networking sites is rapidly expanding and, when compared with e-mail, may be having a significantly different impact on the traditional doctor-patient relationship. Characteristics specific to these online platforms have major implications for professional relationships, including the 'Facebook effect' (the relative permanence of postings) and the 'online disinhibition effect'. The present practice point illustrates relevant ethical considerations and provides guidance to paediatricians and others concerning the prudent professional and personal use of social networking media.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Doctors are uncertain of their ethical and legal obligations when communicating with patients online.
“Doctors are uncertain of their ethical and legal obligations when communicating with patients online.”
From How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
The “Physician websites” section says physicians have legal and ethical obligations when providing advice online, and “Recommendations” discusses guidelines for online interactions. Neither section says doctors are uncertain about those obligations; that is the unsupported part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students
Chretien, K. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
The Facebook effect: the inside story of the company that is connecting the world
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2179 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Online professionalism and the mirror of social media.
Greysen, S. R., Kind, T., & Chretien, K. C. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors
MacDonald, J., Sohn, S., & Ellis, P. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03720.x · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Patient privacy and social media.
Hader, A. L., & Brown, E. D. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Tunick, R. A., & Mednick, L. M. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn088 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
E-mail communication in paediatrics: Ethical and clinical considerations
Albersheim, S., & Canadian Paediatric Society (2010) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/15.3.163 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Family practice web sites: new perspectives for patient care and health information?
Freund, T., Freund, M., Mahler, C., et al. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [16]16. American Medical Association policy: Professionalism in the use of social media (H-140.851), November 8, 2010. <www.ama-assn.org/ ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml> (Accessed May 16, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey
Brown, J., Ryan, C., & Harris, A. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3589 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
New Professionalism Challenges in Medical Training: An Exploration of Social Networking
Kesselheim, J. C., Batra, M., Belmonte, F., Boland, K. A., & McGregor, R. S. (2014) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-13-00132.1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- St-Laurent-Gagnon, T., & Coughlin, K. W.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Paediatric Society (CA)
- Corresponding author
- St-Laurent-Gagnon, Thérèse
- Coughlin, Kevin W
- ORCID
- Coughlin, Kevin W
- Venue
- Paediatrics & Child Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 267-269
- ISSN
- 1205-7088 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1485
- PMC
- PMC3381922
- OpenAlex
- W32162113
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Paediatrics & Child Health (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- social media, blogs, Facebook, pediatricians, medical ethics, physician-patient relationship, online disinhibition effect, professional boundaries, online professional conduct
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
