Cited by 48History and Theory of MathematicsPhilosophy and History of ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

A Counterfactual Approach to Explanation in Mathematics

Open access
Baron, Sam, Colyvan, Mark, Ripley, David·2020·Philosophia Mathematica

Abstract

Our goal in this paper is to extend counterfactual accounts of scientific explanation to mathematics. Our focus, in particular, is on intra-mathematical explanations: explanations of one mathematical fact in terms of another. We offer a basic counterfactual theory of intra-mathematical explanations, before modelling the explanatory structure of a test case using counterfactual machinery. We finish by considering the application of counterpossibles to mathematical explanation, and explore a second test case along these lines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/philmat/nkz023

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2][2] Sam Baron. Optimization and mathematical explanation: Doing the L´ evy walk. Synthese , 191(3):459-479, 2014. -
  2. [25][25] David Lewis. Counterfactuals . Blackwell, Oxford, 1973. -
  3. [42][42] Terrence Tao. Texts and Readings in Mathematics: Vol. 37. Analysis I . Springer, 2016. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baron, S., Colyvan, M., & Ripley, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Baron, Sam
Venue
Philosophia Mathematica
Published
2019-12-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-34
ISSN
  • 0031-8019 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6406
OpenAlex
W2994360042
Cited by
48
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
58.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Philosophia Mathematica (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research (DE180100414, FT110100909)
  • Carl Friedrich von Siemens Research Award of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
mathematical explanation, counterpossibles, counterfactual reasoning, philosophy of mathematics, scientific explanation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review