The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Styles and Practice Policies: Influence on Communication with Patients Regarding Worrisome Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data: Table 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After conducting interviews with medical professionals using PDMPs as a basis for decision-making, Hildebran et al. (2016) individuate detrimental communication styles that are, to my mind, representative of the disruptive role taken up by these systems in mediating interactions between patients and physicians.”
From Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare (2023) · cites this paper as Hildebran et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“As pointed out by these authors, they amount to avoidance and a confrontational communication style [cf. also Picco et al. (2021, p. 14)], both of which are particularly concerning and indicative of hermeneutical injustice.”
From Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare (2023) · cites this paper as Hildebran et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“There is relevant literature pointing at communication difficulties emerging from the ubiquitous use of PDMP systems throughout medical practice, which are particularly concerning and indicative of patients’ potential to suffer epistemic injustice.”
From Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare (2023) · cites this paper as Hildebran et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Crabtree, B. F., Miller, W. L., & Swenson, M. M. (1995) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-199507000-00011 · Cited by 956
The Patient–Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain Care: Providers' Perspectives
Matthias, M. S., Parpart, A. L., Nyland, K. A., Huffman, M. A., Stubbs, D. L., Sargent, C., & Bair, M. J. (2010) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00980.x · Cited by 298
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Deyo, 2014, Leading a horse to water: Facilitating registration and use of the prescription drug monitoring program, Clin J of Pain, 31, 782, 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000180 · DOI
- Paulozzi, 2012, A history of being prescribed controlled substances and risk of drug overdose deaths, Pain Med, 3, 87, 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01260.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/pme.12172 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00960.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/pme.12469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.015 · DOI
- Farin, 2013, The patient-physician relationship in patients with chronic low back pain as a predictor of outcomes after rehabilitation, J Behav Med, 26, 246, 10.1007/s10865-012-9419-z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00330.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0175.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00426.x · DOI
Cited by
Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare
Pozzi, G. (2023) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09676-z · Cited by 66
Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning
Pozzi, G. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108630 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Hildebran, C., Leichtling, G., Irvine, J. M., Cohen, D. J., Hallvik, S. E., & Deyo, R. A.
- Venue
- Pain Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2061-2066
- ISSN
- 1526-2375
- 1526-4637
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Styles and Practice Policies: Influence on Communication with Patients Regarding Worrisome Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data: Table 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pm/pnw019
- The paper
- Hildebran, C., Leichtling, G., Irvine, J. M., Cohen, D. J., Hallvik, S. E., & Deyo, R. A. (2016). Clinical Styles and Practice Policies: Influence on Communication with Patients Regarding Worrisome Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data: Table 1. Pain Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
