The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces
Abstract
To understand further, and to utilize, the interactions across protein-protein interfaces, we carried out an analysis of the hydrogen bonds and of the salt bridges in a collection of 319 non-redundant protein-protein interfaces derived from high-quality X-ray structures. We found that the geometry of the hydrogen bonds across protein interfaces is generally less optimal and has a wider distribution than typically observed within the chains. This difference originates from the more hydrophilic side chains buried in the binding interface than in the folded monomer interior. Protein folding differs from protein binding. Whereas in folding practically all degrees of freedom are available to the chain to attain its optimal configuration, this is not the case for rigid binding, where the protein molecules are already folded, with only six degrees of translational and rotational freedom available to the chains to achieve their most favorable bound configuration. These constraints enforce many polar/charged residues buried in the interface to form weak hydrogen bonds with protein atoms, rather than strongly hydrogen bonding to the solvent. Since interfacial hydrogen bonds are weaker than the intra-chain ones to compete with the binding of water, more water molecules are involved in bridging hydrogen bond networks across the protein interface than in the protein interior. Interfacial water molecules both mediate non-complementary donor-donor or acceptor-acceptor pairs, and connect non-optimally oriented donor-acceptor pairs. These differences between the interfacial hydrogen bonding patterns and the intra-chain ones further substantiate the notion that protein complexes formed by rigid binding may be far away from the global minimum conformations. Moreover, we summarize the pattern of charge complementarity and of the conservation of hydrogen bond network across binding interfaces. We further illustrate the utility of this study in understanding the specificity of protein-protein associations, and hence in docking prediction and molecular (inhibitor) design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21396 · Cited by 760
RGD peptide-based non-viral gene delivery vectors targeting integrin α v β 3 for cancer therapy
Fu, S., Xu, X., Ma, Y., Zhang, S., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Journal of drug targeting · doi:10.1080/1061186x.2018.1455841 · Cited by 139
Ni, D., Lu, S., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21585 · Cited by 116
Targeting Protein–Protein Interactions and Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Valkov, E., Sharpe, T., Marsh, M., Greive, S., & Hyvönen, M. (2011) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2011_265 · Cited by 107
Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt027 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, D., Tsai, C. J., & Nussinov, R.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 999-1012
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2095805596
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/10.9.999
- The paper
- Xu, D., Tsai, C. J., & Nussinov, R. (1997). Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/10.9.999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.